ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "BRAF"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Distinct clinicopathological features in metanephric adenoma harboring BRAF mutation
    (Impact Journals, 2016-07-08) Caliò, Anna; Eble, John N.; Hes, Ondrej; Martignoni, Guido; Harari, Saul E.; Williamson, Sean R.; Brunelli, Matteo; Osunkoya, Adeboye O.; Wang, Lisha; Comperat, Eva; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Wang, Mingsheng; Zhang, Shaobo; Curless, Kendra L.; Post, Kristin M.; Chang, Hsim-Yee; Luchini, Claudio; Baldrige, Lee Ann; MacLennan, Gregory T.; Montironi, Rodolfo; Grignon, David J.; Cheng, Liang; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    BRAF mutation recently has been reported in metanephric adenoma. We sought to determine the clinical and morphologic features of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenoma and to correlate BRAF mutation with BRAF V600E immunohistochemical staining results. A series of 48 metanephric adenomas and 15 epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were analyzed for the occurrence of BRAF mutation (BRAF V600E/V600E complex, BRAF V600D, BRAF V600K and BRAF V600R) using the BRAF RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen). Immunohistochemistry was performed using monoclonal mouse antibodies against p16INK4 and VE1 (Spring Bioscience), recognizing the BRAF V600E mutant protein. Forty-one of 48 cases (85%) showed BRAF V600E mutation; none of the other BRAF variants was detected. Of 41 BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas, 33 showed positive VE1 immunostaining (sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%); in all cases we detected p16INK4 expression regardless of BRAF mutation status. All epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were BRAF-wild-type and none expressed VE1. The following features were associated with BRAF V600E mutation: older patients (p=0.01), female predominance (p=0.005) and the presence of a predominantly acinar architecture (p=0.003). In summary, BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas were associated with older age, female predominance, and the presence of a predominant acinar component. A subset (20%) of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas was not detected by VE1 immunostaining.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    LSD1 inhibition attenuates targeted therapy-induced lineage plasticity in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
    (Springer Nature, 2025-04-23) Ladaika, Christopher A.; Chakraborty, Averi; Masood, Ashiq; Hostetter, Galen; Yi, Joo Mi; O’Hagan, Heather M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: BRAF activating mutations occur in approximately 10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCs) and are associated with worse prognosis in part due to an inferior response to standard chemotherapy. Standard of care for patients with refractory metastatic BRAFV600E CRC is treatment with BRAF and EGFR inhibitors and recent FDA approval was given to use these inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for patients with treatment naïve metastatic BRAFV600E CRC. Lineage plasticity to neuroendocrine cancer is an emerging mechanism of targeted therapy resistance in several cancer types. Enteroendocrine cells (EECs), the neuroendocrine cell of the intestine, are uniquely present in BRAF mutant CRC as compared to BRAF wildtype CRC. Methods: BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor treatment induced changes in cell composition were determined by gene expression, imaging and single cell approaches in multiple models of BRAF mutant CRC. Furthermore, multiple clinically relevant inhibitors of the lysine demethylase LSD1 were tested to determine which inhibitor blocked the changes in cell composition. Results: Combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition enriched for EECs in all BRAF mutant CRC models tested. Additionally, EECs and other secretory cell types were enriched in a subset of BRAFV600E CRC patient samples following targeted therapy. Importantly, inhibition of LSD1 with a clinically relevant inhibitor attenuated targeted therapy-induced EEC enrichment through blocking the interaction of LSD1, CoREST2 and STAT3. Conclusions: Our findings that BRAF plus EGFR inhibition induces lineage plasticity in BRAFV600E CRC represents a new paradigm for how resistance to BRAF plus EGFR inhibition occurs. Additionally, our finding that LSD1 inhibition blocks lineage plasticity has the potential to improve responses to BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University