Browsing by Subject "BMP-2"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on Neovascularization During Large Bone Defect Regeneration
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2019-12) Pearson, Hope B.; Mason, Devon E.; Kegelman, Christopher D.; Zhao, Liming; Dawahare, James H.; Kacena, Melissa A.; Boerckel, Joel D.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine
    Insufficient blood vessel supply is a primary limiting factor for regenerative approaches to large bone defect repair. Recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) delivery induces robust bone formation and has been observed to enhance neovascularization, but whether the angiogenic effects of BMP-2 are due to direct endothelial cell stimulation or due to indirect paracrine signaling remain unclear. In this study, we evaluated the effects of BMP-2 delivery on vascularized bone regeneration and tested whether BMP-2 induces neovascularization directly or indirectly. We found that delivery of BMP-2 (5 μg) enhanced both bone formation and neovascularization in critically sized (8 mm) rat femoral bone defects; however, BMP-2 did not directly stimulate angiogenesis in vitro. In contrast, conditioned medium from both mesenchymal progenitor cells and osteoblasts induced endothelial cell migration in vitro, suggesting a paracrine mechanism of BMP-2 action. Consistent with this inference, codelivery of BMP-2 with endothelial colony forming cells to a heterotopic site, distant from the skeletal stem cell-rich bone marrow niche, induced ossification but had no effect on neovascularization. Taken together, these data suggest that paracrine activation of osteoprogenitor cells is an important contributor to neovascularization during BMP-2-mediated bone regeneration. Impact Statement In this study, we show that bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) robustly induces neovascularization during tissue-engineered large bone defect regeneration, and we found that BMP-2 induced angiogenesis, in part, through paracrine signaling from osteoprogenitor cells.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of diet, BMP-2 treatment, and femoral skeletal injury on endothelial cells derived from the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs
    (Wiley, 2022) Dadwal, Ushashi C.; Staut, Caio de Andrade; Tewari, Nikhil P.; Awosanya, Olatundun D.; Mendenhall, Stephen K.; Valuch, Conner R.; Nagaraj, Rohit U.; Blosser, Rachel J.; Li, Jiliang; Kacena, Melissa Ann; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine
    Type 2 diabetes (T2D) results in physiological and structural changes in bone, contributing to poor fracture healing. T2D compromises microvascular performance, which can negatively impact bone regeneration as angiogenesis is required for new bone formation. We examined the effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) administered locally at the time of femoral segmental bone defect (SBD) surgery, and its angiogenic impacts on endothelial cells (ECs) isolated from the ipsilateral or contralateral tibia in T2D mice. Male C57BL/6 mice were fed either a low fat diet (LFD) or high fat diet (HFD) starting at 8 weeks. After 12 weeks, the T2D phenotype in HFD mice was confirmed via glucose and insulin tolerance testing and echoMRI, and all mice underwent SBD surgery. Mice were treated with BMP-2 (5μg) or saline at the time of surgery. Three weeks post-surgery, bone marrow ECs were isolated from ipsilateral and contralateral tibias, and proliferation, angiogenic potential, and gene expression of the cells was analyzed. BMP-2 treatment increased EC proliferation by 2 fold compared to saline in LFD contralateral tibia ECs, but no changes were seen in surgical tibia EC proliferation. BMP-2 treatment enhanced vessel-like structure formation in HFD mice whereas, the opposite was observed in LFD mice. Still, in BMP-2 treated LFD mice, ipsilateral tibia ECs increased expression of CD31, FLT-1, ANGPT1, and ANGPT2. These data suggest that the modulating effects of T2D and BMP-2 on the microenvironment of bone marrow ECs may differentially influence angiogenic properties at the fractured limb versus the contralateral limb.