Browsing by Subject "Appendicitis"

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Accountable Care Organization Maintains Access for Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    (Elsevier, 2023) Menchaca, Alicia D.; Style, Candace C.; Wang, Ling; Cooper, Jennifer N.; Minneci, Peter C.; Olutoye, Oluyinka O.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction: It has been reported that pediatric patients experienced a delay in treatment for acute appendicitis during the pandemic, resulting in increased rates of complicated appendicitis. We investigated the association of the COVID-19 pandemic and the incidence and severity of acute appendicitis among pediatric Medicaid patients using a population-based approach. Methods: The claims database of Partners For Kids, a pediatric Medicaid accountable care organization (ACO) in Ohio, was queried for cases of acute appendicitis from April to August 2017-2020. The monthly rate of acute appendicitis/100,000 covered lives was calculated each year and compared over time. Rates of complicated appendicitis were also compared. Diagnosis code validation for classification as complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was performed for patients treated at our hospital. Results: During the study period, 465 unique cases of acute appendicitis were identified. Forty percent (186/465) were coded as complicated. No significant difference in the incidence of acute appendicitis cases was observed across the 4 y, either in an overall comparison or in pairwise comparisons (P > 0.15 for all). The proportion of acute appendicitis cases that were coded as complicated did vary significantly over the 4-year study period (P = 0.005); this was due to this proportion being significantly higher in 2018 than in either 2019 (P = 0.005 versus 2018) or 2020 (P = 0.03 versus 2018). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with reduced access to treatment for acute appendicitis among patients in a pediatric Medicaid ACO. This suggests that an ACO may promote continued healthcare access for their covered population during an unexpected crisis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of Nonoperative Management Using Antibiotic Therapy vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Treatment Success and Disability Days in Children With Uncomplicated Appendicitis
    (American Medical Association, 2020-08) Minneci, Peter C.; Hade, Erinn M.; Lawrence, Amy E.; Sebastião, Yuri V.; Saito, Jacqueline M.; Mak, Grace Z.; Fox, Christa; Hirschl, Ronald B.; Gadepalli, Samir; Helmrath, Michael A.; Kohler, Jonathan E.; Leys, Charles M.; Sato, Thomas T.; Lal, Dave R.; Landman, Matthew P.; Kabre, Rashmi; Fallat, Mary E.; Cooper, Jennifer N.; Deans, Katherine J.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance: Nonoperative management with antibiotics alone has the potential to treat uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with fewer disability days than surgery. Objective: To determine the success rate of nonoperative management and compare differences in treatment-related disability, satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and complications between nonoperative management and surgery in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Design, setting, and participants: Multi-institutional nonrandomized controlled intervention study of 1068 children aged 7 through 17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis treated at 10 tertiary children's hospitals across 7 US states between May 2015 and October 2018 with 1-year follow-up through October 2019. Of the 1209 eligible patients approached, 1068 enrolled in the study. Interventions: Patient and family selection of nonoperative management with antibiotics alone (nonoperative group, n = 370) or urgent (≤12 hours of admission) laparoscopic appendectomy (surgery group, n = 698). Main outcomes and measures: The 2 primary outcomes assessed at 1 year were disability days, defined as the total number of days the child was not able to participate in all of his/her normal activities secondary to appendicitis-related care (expected difference, 5 days), and success rate of nonoperative management, defined as the proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively who did not undergo appendectomy by 1 year (lowest acceptable success rate, ≥70%). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences between treatment groups for all outcome assessments. Results: Among 1068 patients who were enrolled (median age, 12.4 years; 38% girls), 370 (35%) chose nonoperative management and 698 (65%) chose surgery. A total of 806 (75%) had complete follow-up: 284 (77%) in the nonoperative group; 522 (75%) in the surgery group. Patients in the nonoperative group were more often younger (median age, 12.3 years vs 12.5 years), Black (9.6% vs 4.9%) or other race (14.6% vs 8.7%), had caregivers with a bachelor's degree (29.8% vs 23.5%), and underwent diagnostic ultrasound (79.7% vs 74.5%). After IPTW, the success rate of nonoperative management at 1 year was 67.1% (96% CI, 61.5%-72.31%; P = .86). Nonoperative management was associated with significantly fewer patient disability days at 1 year than did surgery (adjusted mean, 6.6 vs 10.9 days; mean difference, -4.3 days (99% CI, -6.17 to -2.43; P < .001). Of 16 other prespecified secondary end points, 10 showed no significant difference. Conclusion and relevance: Among children with uncomplicated appendicitis, an initial nonoperative management strategy with antibiotics alone had a success rate of 67.1% and, compared with urgent surgery, was associated with statistically significantly fewer disability days at 1 year. However, there was substantial loss to follow-up, the comparison with the prespecified threshold for an acceptable success rate of nonoperative management was not statistically significant, and the hypothesized difference in disability days was not met.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Ultrasound Is Safe and Highly Specific for Acute Appendicitis in Moderate to High Pre-test Probability Patients
    (eScholarship, 2018-05) Corson-Knowles, Daniel; Russell, Frances M.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Clinical ultrasound (CUS) is highly specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis but is operator-dependent. The goal of this study was to determine if a heterogeneous group of emergency physicians (EP) could diagnose acute appendicitis on CUS in patients with a moderate to high pre-test probability. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of a convenience sample of adult and pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis. Sonographers received a structured, 20-minute CUS training on appendicitis prior to patient enrollment. The presence of a dilated (>6 mm diameter), non-compressible, blind-ending tubular structure was considered a positive study. Non-visualization or indeterminate studies were considered negative. We collected pre-test probability of acute appendicitis based on a 10-point visual analog scale (moderate to high was defined as >3), and confidence in CUS interpretation. The primary objective was measured by comparing CUS findings to surgical pathology and one week follow-up. Results: We enrolled 105 patients; 76 had moderate to high pre-test probability. Of these, 24 were children. The rate of appendicitis was 36.8% in those with moderate to high pre-test probability. CUS were recorded by 33 different EPs. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of EP-performed CUS in patients with moderate to high pre-test probability were 42.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] [25-62.5%]), 97.9% (95% CI [87.5-99.8%]), 20.7 (95% CI [2.8-149.9]) and 0.58 (95% CI [0.42-0.8]), respectively. The 16 false negative scans were all interpreted as indeterminate. There was one false positive CUS diagnosis; however, the sonographer reported low confidence of 2/10. Conclusion: A heterogeneous group of EP sonographers can safely identify acute appendicitis with high specificity in patients with moderate to high pre-test probability. This data adds support for surgical consultation without further imaging beyond CUS in the appropriate clinical setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With the Failure of Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
    (JAMA, 2022-05-02) Minneci, Peter C.; Hade, Erinn M.; Gil, Lindsay A.; Metzger, Gregory A.; Saito, Jacqueline M.; Mak, Grace Z.; Hirschl, Ronald B.; Gadepalli, Samir; Helmrath, Michael A.; Leys, Charles M.; Sato, Thomas T.; Lal, Dave R.; Landman, Matthew P.; Kabre, Rashmi; Fallat, Mary E.; Cooper, Jennifer N.; Deans, Katherine J.; Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance: The factors associated with the failure of nonoperative management of appendicitis and the differences in patient-reported outcomes between successful and unsuccessful nonoperative management remain unknown. Objectives: To investigate factors associated with the failure of nonoperative management of appendicitis and compare patient-reported outcomes between patients whose treatment succeeded and those whose treatment failed. Design, setting, and participants: This study was a planned subgroup secondary analysis conducted in 10 children's hospitals that included 370 children aged 7 to 17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial between May 1, 2015, and October 31, 2018, with 1-year follow-up comparing nonoperative management with antibiotics vs surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis. Statistical analysis was performed from November 1, 2019, to February 12, 2022. Interventions: Nonoperative management with antibiotics vs surgery. Main outcomes and measures: Failure of nonoperative management and patient-reported outcomes. The relative risk (RR) of failure based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was calculated. Patient-reported outcomes were compared based on the success or failure of nonoperative management. Results: Of 370 patients (34.6% of 1068 total patients; 229 boys [61.9%]; median age, 12.3 years [IQR, 10.0-14.6 years]) enrolled in the nonoperative group, treatment failure occurred for 125 patients (33.8%) at 1 year, with 53 patients (14.3%) undergoing appendectomy during initial hospitalization and 72 patients (19.5%) experiencing delayed treatment failure after hospital discharge. Higher patient-reported pain at presentation was associated with increased risk of in-hospital treatment failure (RR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.0-4.4]) but not delayed treatment failure (RR, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.7-2.3]) or overall treatment failure at 1 year (RR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.2]). Pain duration greater than 24 hours was associated with decreased risk of delayed treatment failure (RR, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-1.0]) but not in-hospital treatment failure (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.5-2.7]) or treatment failure at 1 year (RR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.2]). There was no increased risk of treatment failure associated with age, white blood cell count, sex, race, ethnicity, primary language, insurance status, transfer status, symptoms at presentation, or imaging results. Health care satisfaction at 30 days and patient-reported, health-related quality of life at 30 days and 1 year were not different. Satisfaction with the decision was higher with successful nonoperative management at 30 days (28.0 vs 27.0; difference, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.01-2.0]) and 1 year (28.1 vs 27.0; difference, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.2-2.0]). Conclusions and relevance: This analysis suggests that a higher pain level at presentation was associated with a higher risk of initial failure of nonoperative management and that a longer duration of pain was associated with lower risk of delayed treatment failure. Although satisfaction was high in both groups, satisfaction with the treatment decision was higher among patients with successful nonoperative management at 1 year.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identification of Bias in Ordering Further Imaging in Ethnic Groups With Indeterminate Ultrasound for Appendicitis
    (Springer Nature, 2022-08-17) Desai, Puja; Haut, Lindsey; Wagers, Brian; Coffee, R. Lane, Jr.; Kelker, Heather; Wyderko, Michael; Sarmiento, Elisa J.; Kanis, Jessica; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Recent studies have shown a higher incidence of complications from acute appendicitis in Hispanic populations. Hispanic ethnicity alone has been shown to be a risk factor. In contrast, one study found little evidence of racial disparities in complication rates. The objective of this study was to identify physician bias regarding whether ethnicity drives further testing after initial radiologic imaging has been obtained in the evaluation of appendicitis in our pediatric emergency department (PED). The use of computed tomography (CT) scan in the diagnosis of appendicitis was compared between Hispanic versus non-Hispanic populations when ultrasound (US) was indeterminate. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort study of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients aged 2-18 who presented to the PED with right lower quadrant abdominal pain over a one-year period (January 1, 2017 to December 29, 2017). Both groups were subdivided into positive, negative, or indeterminate US findings for appendicitis. Each subgroup was analyzed based on those who had CT imaging done. Results: A total of 471 ultrasounds were performed, 162 Hispanic and 309 non-Hispanic patients. Indeterminate US scans were documented in 90/162 (56%) Hispanic versus 155/309 (50%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with indeterminate US scans, 30% Hispanic versus 32% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Negative US scans were documented in 54/162 (33%) Hispanic versus 102/309 (33%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with negative US scans, 7% Hispanic versus 5% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Chi-square analysis comparing both the proportion of CT scans received for indeterminate US scans (p=0.71) and negative US scans (p=0.52) showed no statistical significance. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the number of CT scans ordered for indeterminate US scans between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. One can infer that there is no inherent bias toward ordering advanced imaging in Hispanic children based on ethnicity alone.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multi-institutional trial of non-operative management and surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Design and rationale
    (Elsevier, 2019-08-01) Minneci, Peter C.; Hade, Erinn M.; Lawrence, Amy E.; Saito, Jacqueline M.; Mak, Grace Z.; Hirschl, Ronald B.; Gadepalli, Samir; Helmrath, Michael A.; Leys, Charles M.; Sato, Thomas T.; Lal, Dave R.; Landman, Matthew P.; Kabre, Rashmi; Fallat, Mary E.; Fischer, Beth A.; Cooper, Jennifer N.; Deans, Katherine J.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Traditionally, children presenting with appendicitis are referred for urgent appendectomy. Recent improvements in the quality and availability of diagnostic imaging allow for better pre-operative characterization of appendicitis, including severity of inflammation; size of the appendix; and presence of extra-luminal inflammation, phlegmon, or abscess. These imaging advances, in conjunction with the availability of broad spectrum oral antibiotics, allow for the identification of a subset of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis that can be successfully treated with antibiotics alone. Recent studies demonstrated that antibiotics alone are a safe and efficacious treatment alternative for patents with uncomplicated appendicitis. The objective of this study is to perform a multi-institutional trial to examine the effectiveness of non-operative management of uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis across a group of large children’s hospitals. A prospective patient choice design was chosen to compare non-operative management to surgery in order to assess effectiveness in a broad population representative of clinical practice in which non-operative management is offered as an alternative to surgery. The risks and benefits of each treatment are very different and a “successful” treatment depends on which risks and benefits are most important to each patient and his/her family. The patient-choice design allows for alignment of preferences with treatment. Patients meeting eligibility criteria are offered a choice of non-operative management or appendectomy. Primary outcomes include determining the success rate of non-operative management and comparing differences in disability days, and secondarily, complication rates, quality of life, and healthcare satisfaction, between patients choosing non-operative management and those choosing appendectomy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy
    (Springer, 2024) Kumar, Sunjay S.; Collings, Amelia T.; Wunker, Claire; Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.; DeLong, Colin G.; Hong, Julie S.; Ansari, Mohammed T.; Abou‑Setta, Ahmed; Oliver, Emily; Berghella, Vincenzo; Alli, Vamsi; Hassan, Imran; Hollands, Celeste; Sylla, Patricia; Slater, Bethany J.; Palazzo, Francesco; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: When pregnant patients present with nonobstetric pathology, the physicians caring for them may be uncertain about the optimal management strategy. The aim of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations for pregnant patients presenting with common surgical pathologies including appendicitis, biliary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee convened a working group to address these issues. The group generated five key questions and completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. An expert panel then met to form evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Expert opinion was utilized when the available evidence was deemed insufficient. Results: The expert panel agreed on ten recommendations addressing the management of appendicitis, biliary disease, and IBD during pregnancy. Conclusions: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of appendectomy over nonoperative treatment of appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over nonoperative treatment of biliary disease and acute cholecystitis specifically. Based on expert opinion, the panel also suggested either operative or nonoperative treatment of biliary diseases other than acute cholecystitis in the third trimester, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rather than common bile duct exploration for symptomatic choledocholithiasis, applying the same criteria for emergent surgical intervention in pregnant and non-pregnant IBD patients, utilizing an open rather than minimally invasive approach for pregnant patients requiring emergent surgical treatment of IBD, and managing pregnant patients with active IBD flares in a multidisciplinary fashion at centers with IBD expertise.