Browsing by Subject "Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intravitreal sirolimus for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration: a Pilot Study
    (BMC, 2021-02-16) Minturn, Robert J.; Bracha, Peter; Klein, Margaret J.; Chhablani, Jay; Harless, Ashley M.; Maturi, Raj K.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Background and objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal sirolimus for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: This institutional review board approved, registered (NCT02357342), prospective, subject-masked, single center, randomized controlled trial in subjects with persistent, exudative Age-related macular degeneration compared intravitreal sirolimus monotherapy (every 2 months) versus monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) over six months. Results: 20 subjects were randomized to each arm of the trial. Upon completion of the trial 20 patients were analyzed in the control (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) group and 17 patients were analyzed in the treatment (sirolimus) group. On average, subjects had 33 previous anti-VEGF injections prior to entry. The primary end-point, mean central subfield thickness (CST), increased by 20 µm in the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor group and decreased by 40 µm in the sirolimus group (p = 0.03). Visual acuity outcomes were similar between groups. Serious ocular adverse events in the sirolimus group included one subject each with anterior uveitis, central retinal artery occlusion and subretinal hemorrhage. Conclusion: Monotherapy with intravitreal sirolimus for subjects with persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration appears to have a limited positive anatomic benefit. The presence of adverse events in the experimental group merits further evaluation, potentially as an adjuvant therapy. Trial registration This trial was registered with the clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02357342, and was approved by the institutional review board at Advarra. Funding was provided by an investigator-initiated grant from Santen. Santen played no role in the design or implementation of this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intravitreal sirolimus with adjunct aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study
    (BMC, 2023-01-05) Rowe, Lucas W.; Minturn, Robert J.; Burgett, Lauren A.; Bracha, Peter; Maturi, Raj K.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Background: To determine the safety and efficacy of intravitreal sirolimus and adjunct aflibercept in subjects with persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration despite previous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Methods: This institutional review board approved, registered (NCT02732899), prospective, subject-masked, single center, randomized controlled trial in subjects with persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration compared alternating monthly intravitreal sirolimus and aflibercept (combination) versus aflibercept monotherapy (control) every 2 months over the course of 36 weeks. The primary measure of efficacy in the study was the mean change in central subfield thickness. Results: 20 subjects were enrolled in the study, with 10 subjects assigned to each treatment group. Subjects had an average of 38 previous anti-VEGF injections. Mean central subfield thickness decreased in the combination group by 54.0 μm compared to 0.1 μm in the control group (p = 0.28). Mean visual acuity improved in the combination group by 2.5 ETDRS letters versus 0.8 ETDRS letters in the control group (p = 0.42). There were no serious ocular adverse events in either group; however, there were three serious systemic events in the combination group, including hospitalizations due to pancreatitis, pneumonia, and worsening hypertension. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean central subfield thickness change between the combination and control groups. However, intravitreal sirolimus with adjunct aflibercept did appear to have potential anatomical benefits as a treatment for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration and requires further investigation with a larger cohort to better understand the potential risks and benefits.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Management of Peripapillary Choroidal Neovascular Membrane in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2019-12) Ozgonul, Cem; Moinuddin, Omar; Munie, Metasebia; Lee, Michael S.; Bhatti, M. Tariq; Landau, Klara; Van Stavern, Gregory P.; Mackay, Devin D.; Lebas, Maud; DeLott, Lindsey B.; Cornblath, Wayne T.; Besirli, Cagri G.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Objective: To report the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with peripapillary choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) secondary to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Methods: Retrospective, multicenter chart review of patients diagnosed with peripapillary CNVM in the course of the treatment and follow-up of IIH. Results: Records were reviewed from 7 different institutions between 2006 and 2016. Ten patients (13 eyes) with a diagnosis of IIH and at least 3 months of follow-up developed CNVM. Three of the total 10 patients developed bilateral CNVM. The mean time from the diagnosis of IIH to CNVM diagnosis was 41 months. Mean follow-up period was 8 months after diagnosis of CNVM. All patients were treated with acetazolamide for IIH. Seven eyes were observed, and 6 eyes were given anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept. All CNVMs regressed with subretinal fibrosis, and visual acuity improved in most patients. Papilledema resolved in only 1 eye, while the other 12 eyes had persistent papilledema at last follow-up. Conclusions: Peripapillary CNVM, a rare complication of IIH, often resolves spontaneously with treatment of IIH. In vision-threatening and/or persistent cases, intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment may be a safe and effective therapeutic option.