Browsing by Subject "Alveolar Process"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item The effects of primary alvelar bone grafting on maxillary growth and development(1993) Tanimura, Leslie K.; Avery, David R.; Hennon, David Kent, 1933-; Nelson, Charles L.; Sadove, A. Michael; Branca, Ronald A.This investigation served as a follow-up of the unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients who underwent primary alveolar bone grafting at James Whitcomb Riley Hospital of the Indiana University Medical Center. The sample consisted of 18 patients, 15 males and three females, who received primary alveolar grafts between September 7, 1983 and March 5, 1985. Thirteen had complete unilateral clefts, and five had complete bilateral clefts of the lip and palate. The mean age of the group was 8 years, and none had received orthodontic treatment. The statistical analysis of the lateral cephalometric radiographs revealed significant differences in maxillofacial growth between the Riley sample population and the non-cleft, age-matched patients in the University of Michigan Growth Study. The Riley data were, overall, statistically and proportionately smaller than the normal population. These findings are due to the smaller skeletal size of the Riley group. Arch symmetry measurements indicated that at 8 years of age there were significant differences from ideal or perfect symmetry. Due to existent dental development and scarring from the palatal procedure, these findings were expected. Ideal symmetry may not be a realistic achievement for the cleft patients. Palatal surface area values were visually analyzed through graphs. The growth patterns of the Riley population were similar to those of the normal and non-grafted cleft groups in a study from the University of Miami. The data supports the theory that primary alveolar bone grafting, as performed at James Whitcomb Riley Hospital, does not result in growth attenuation.Item Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction(Elsevier, 2015-04) Jiang, Feifei; Liu, Sean S.-Y.; Xia, Zeyang; Li, Shuning; Chen, Jie; Kula, Katherine S.; Eckert, George; Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, IU School of DentistryINTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the Hounsfield unit (HU) changes in the alveolar bone and root surfaces during controlled canine retractions. METHODS: Eighteen maxillary canine retraction patients were selected for this split-mouth design clinical trial. The canines in each patient were randomly assigned to receive either translation or controlled tipping treatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans of each patient were used to determine tooth movement direction and HU changes. The alveolar bone and root surface were divided into 108 divisions, respectively. The HUs in each division were measured. Mixed-model analysis of variance was applied to test the HU change distribution at the P <0.05 significance level. RESULTS: The HU changes varied with the directions relative to the canine movement. The HU reductions occurred at the root surfaces. Larger reductions occurred in the divisions that were perpendicular to the moving direction. However, HUs decreased in the alveolar bone in the moving direction. The highest HU reduction was at the coronal level. CONCLUSIONS: HU reduction occurs on the root surface in the direction perpendicular to tooth movement and in the alveolar bone in the direction of tooth movement when a canine is retracted.Item Mechanical environment change in root, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone in response to two canine retraction treatment strategies(Wiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing), 2015-04) Jiang, F.; Xia, Z.; Li, S.; Eckert, G.; Chen, J.; Department of Engineering Technology, School of Engineering and TechnologyOBJECTIVE: To investigate the initial mechanical environment (ME) changes in root surface, periodontal ligament (PDL), and alveolar bone due to two treatment strategies, low or high moment-to-force ratio (M/F). SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Eighteen patients who underwent maxillary bilateral canine retraction. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Finite element models of the maxillary canines from the patients were built based on their cone beam computed tomography scans. For each patient, the canine on one side had a specially designed T-loop spring with the M/F higher than the other side. Four stress invariants (1st principal/dilatational/3rd principal/von Mises stress) in the tissues were calculated. The stresses were compared with the bone mineral density (BMD) changes reported previously for linking the ME change to bone modeling/remodeling activities. The correlation was tested by the mixed-model anova. RESULTS: The alveolar bone in the direction of tooth movement is primarily in tension, while the PDL is in compression; the stresses in the opposite direction have a reversed pattern. The M/F primarily affects the stress in root. Three stress invariants (1st principal/3rd principal/dilatational stress) in the tooth movement direction have moderate correlations with BMD loss. CONCLUSIONS: The stress invariants may be used to characterize what the osteocytes sense when ME changes. Their distributions in the tissues are significantly different, meaning the cells experience different stimuli. The higher bone activities along the direction of tooth movement may be related to the initial volumetric increase and decrease in the alveolar bone.Item Ridge Dimensional Changes: A Comparative Study of Socket Compression After Dental Extraction with No Compression(2013) Bennett, Duane Everett, II, 1984-; Prakasam, Sivaraman; Blanchard, Steven B.; Parks, Edwin T. (Edwin Thomas), 1955-; Ghoneima, Ahmed; John, Vanchit (Vanchit Kurien), 1965-Exodontia, or extraction of teeth, has been a well-documented dental treatment that forms one of the foundations of dentistry. The steps associated with extracting teeth have changed little in the last century and these steps are largely part of the dogma of dentistry. One such step is that of socket compression post-extraction. Rationale for socket compression after extraction is manifold. They include: shorter healing times, fewer dry sockets and re-approximating walls that were stretched in the elevation and delivery stages of extractions. The purpose of this study was to determine if post-extraction ridge compression negatively affected alveolar ridge dimensions when compared to sites that are not compressed post-extraction. Secondary outcome measures will identify if socket compression/re-approximation affects the rate of soft tissue closure or occurrence of alveolar osteitis. In this study, 14 subjects were recruited. Eight subjects formed the compression group, while six formed the non-compression group. The subjects in the compression group received compression of their alveolar ridges after extraction to approximate their original pre-extraction width. The subjects in the non-compression group did not receive ridge compression. Each subject had pre-extraction and post-extraction CBCT scans along with post-operative follow up visits at 1, 2, and 4 weeks post-extraction. The present investigation found that with respect to changes in ridge width, sites that were compressed did not lose significantly more dimension than those that were not. With respect to ridge height, sites that were compressed did not lose significantly more dimension than those that were not. Sites that were compressed and sites that were not, healed at approximately the same rate, with respect to soft tissue closure. While the results showed a lack of statistical significance between both groups, there appears to be a trend towards the ridge compression group having a smaller ridge width. Such a trend was not noted with soft tissue closure, thereby invalidating the rationale for socket compression after extraction. One of the limitations of this pilot study is the small sample size. Further validation of these results must be done with a larger sample size in order to provide clinical guidance to dental practitioners.