Browsing by Subject "Algorithm"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)
    (Springer, 2019-12-01) Hawryluk, Gregory W. J.; Aguilera, Sergio; Buki, Andras; Bulger, Eileen; Citerio, Giuseppe; Cooper, D. Jamie; Arrastia, Ramon Diaz; Diringer, Michael; Figaji, Anthony; Gao, Guoyi; Geocadin, Romergryko; Ghajar, Jamshid; Harris, Odette; Hoffer, Alan; Hutchinson, Peter; Joseph, Mathew; Kitagawa, Ryan; Manley, Geoffrey; Mayer, Stephan; Menon, David K.; Meyfroidt, Geert; Michael, Daniel B.; Oddo, Mauro; Okonkwo, David; Patel, Mayur; Robertson, Claudia; Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.; Rubiano, Andres M.; Sahuquillo, Juan; Servadei, Franco; Shutter, Lori; Stein, Deborah; Stocchetti, Nino; Taccone, Fabio Silvio; Timmons, Shelly; Tsai, Eve; Ullman, Jamie S.; Vespa, Paul; Videtta, Walter; Wright, David W.; Zammit, Christopher; Chesnut, Randall M.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based. Methods We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a traffic-light model where panelists’ decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations. Results We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination. Conclusions Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management recommendations based on combined expert opinion. It reflects neither a standard-of-care nor a substitute for thoughtful individualized management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Markers of Futile Resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Review of the Evidence and a Proposal for Futility Time-Outs during Massive Transfusion
    (MDPI, 2024-08-09) Walsh, Mark M.; Fox, Mark D.; Moore, Ernest E.; Johnson, Jeffrey L.; Bunch, Connor M.; Miller, Joseph B.; Lopez-Plaza, Ileana; Brancamp, Rachel L.; Waxman, Dan A.; Thomas, Scott G.; Fulkerson, Daniel H.; Thomas, Emmanuel J.; Khan, Hassaan A.; Zackariya, Sufyan K.; Al-Fadhl, Mahmoud D.; Zackariya, Saniya K.; Thomas, Samuel J.; Aboukhaled, Michael W.; Futile Indicators for Stopping Transfusion in Trauma (FISTT) Collaborative Group; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The reduction in the blood supply following the 2019 coronavirus pandemic has been exacerbated by the increased use of balanced resuscitation with blood components including whole blood in urban trauma centers. This reduction of the blood supply has diminished the ability of blood banks to maintain a constant supply to meet the demands associated with periodic surges of urban trauma resuscitation. This scarcity has highlighted the need for increased vigilance through blood product stewardship, particularly among severely bleeding trauma patients (SBTPs). This stewardship can be enhanced by the identification of reliable clinical and laboratory parameters which accurately indicate when massive transfusion is futile. Consequently, there has been a recent attempt to develop scoring systems in the prehospital and emergency department settings which include clinical, laboratory, and physiologic parameters and blood products per hour transfused as predictors of futile resuscitation. Defining futility in SBTPs, however, remains unclear, and there is only nascent literature which defines those criteria which reliably predict futility in SBTPs. The purpose of this review is to provide a focused examination of the literature in order to define reliable parameters of futility in SBTPs. The knowledge of these reliable parameters of futility may help define a foundation for drawing conclusions which will provide a clear roadmap for traumatologists when confronted with SBTPs who are candidates for the declaration of futility. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the definition of futile resuscitation for patients with trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock, and we propose a concise roadmap for clinicians to help them use well-defined clinical, laboratory, and viscoelastic parameters which can define futility.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rapid Review: ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm
    (2024-08-20) Dijak, Frank
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Lawnmower and the Pediatric Lower Extremity: A Catastrophic Combination
    (Open Science, 2024-02-26) Sathyanarayanan, Sairandri; Obinero, Chioma G.; Green, Jackson C.; Fallah, Kasra N.; Greives, Matthew R.; Chen, Wendy; Nguyen, Phuong D.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Lower extremity (LE) trauma within the pediatric population may be debilitating and have different implications and etiologies than in adults. Specifically, lawnmower injuries can cause catastrophic sequelae to the lower extremities, often requiring complex reconstruction or resulting in amputation. This study aims to present our experience with pediatric LE lawnmower injuries at one of the busiest level 1 trauma centers in the United States. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective analysis was performed studying pediatric patients (age <18 years) who experienced LE trauma due to a lawnmower injury over a 5-year period (2012-2017). Patient demographics, perioperative data, and types of reconstruction were reviewed. Univariate analysis of the data was performed to examine trends in exposure and management of pediatric LE lawnmower injuries. Results: Twenty-three patients were identified with pediatric LE lawnmower injuries, of whom 82.6% were male. The patients had a median age of 6 years and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 4. Over one-third (34.8%) of this cohort required immediate amputation. Additionally, 26.1% and 8.7% required local and free flap reconstruction, respectively. In comparison, only 3.6% and 2.3% of all traumatic pediatric LE injuries from the same time frame required local and free flaps, respectively. Conclusions: Lawnmower injuries to the LE can be devastating, causing long-term physical, emotional, and psychosocial consequences for pediatric patients and their families. The data in this study suggest that pediatric LE injuries from lawnmowers more often require complex reconstruction than other traumatic LE injuries. Rapid and effective decision-making by experienced surgeons is necessary to optimize the potential for limb salvage in pediatric LE lawnmower injuries. An algorithm of recommendations on when to transfer these types of injuries to more experienced tertiary centers is provided. Additional resources should be dedicated toward improving public awareness and industrial safety features to help prevent lawnmower injuries in pediatric patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Variability of Low-Z Inhomogeneity Correction in IMRT/SBRT: A Multi-Institutional Collaborative Study
    (MDPI, 2023-01-23) Yadav, Poonam; DesRosiers, Colleen M.; Mitra, Raj K.; Srivastava, Shiv P.; Das, Indra J.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Dose-calculation algorithms are critical for radiation treatment outcomes that vary among treatment planning systems (TPS). Modern algorithms use sophisticated radiation transport calculation with detailed three-dimensional beam modeling to provide accurate doses, especially in heterogeneous medium and small fields used in IMRT/SBRT. While the dosimetric accuracy in heterogeneous mediums (lung) is qualitatively known, the accuracy is unknown. The aim of this work is to analyze the calculated dose in lung patients and compare the validity of dose-calculation algorithms by measurements in a low-Z phantom for two main classes of algorithms: type A (pencil beam) and type B (collapse cone). The CT scans with volumes (target and organs at risk, OARs) of a lung patient and a phantom build to replicate the human lung data were sent to nine institutions for planning. Doses at different depths and field sizes were measured in the phantom with and without inhomogeneity correction across multiple institutions to understand the impact of clinically used dose algorithms. Wide dosimetric variations were observed in target and OAR coverage in patient plans. The correction factor for collapsed cone algorithms was less than pencil beam algorithms in the small fields used in SBRT. The pencil beam showed ≈70% variations between measured and calculated correction factors for various field sizes and depths. For large field sizes the trends of both types of algorithms were similar. The differences in measured versus calculated dose for type-B algorithms were within ±10%. Significant variations in the target and OARs were observed among various TPS. The results suggest that the pencil beam algorithm does not provide an accurate dose and should not be considered with small fields (IMRT/SBRT). Type-B collapsed-cone algorithms provide better agreement with measurements, but still vary among various systems.