Browsing by Subject "Alcohol-associated hepatitis"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial for treatment of Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis
    (Elsevier, 2023-01-18) Tu, Wanzhu; Gawrieh, Samer; Dasarathy, Srinivasan; Mitchell, Mack C.; Simonetto, Douglas A.; Patidar, Kavish R.; McClain, Craig J.; Bataller, Ramon; Szabo, Gyongyi; Tang, Qing; Barton, Bruce A.; Radaeva, Svetlana; Sanyal, Arun J.; Shah, Vijay; Alcoholic Hepatitis Network (AlcHepNet) Investigators; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Background: Mortality is high for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). Corticosteroids are the standard of care for patients without contraindications. Recent data showed that interleukin-1β receptor antagonist anakinra attenuated inflammation and liver damage. We designed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of anakinra compared to prednisone. Methods: Patients meeting the clinical and biochemical criteria for severe AH with MELD scores between 20 and 35 were recruited at eight clinical sites. Eligible patients enrolled in the study were randomized to anakinra, 100 mg subcutaneous injection for 14 days, plus zinc sulfate 220 mg for 90 days, vs. prednisone 40 mg PO daily for 30 days. Matching placebos for anakinra, zinc, and prednisone were provided to mask the treatment. Participants were followed for 180 days. The primary outcome was overall survival at 90 days. An unadjusted log-rank test was used to compare the survival of the two treatments in the first 90 days. Between July 10, 2020, and March 4, 2022, we screened 1082 patients with severe AH, and 147 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized. The average baseline MELD score was 25 [range 20-35], Maddrey discriminant function (MDF) was 59.4 [range 20.2-197.5]. The mean aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio was 3.5. The baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: The study provided a direct comparison of the survival benefits and safety profiles of anakinra plus zinc vs. prednisone in patients with severe AH.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development and evaluation of objective trial performance metrics for multisite clinical studies: Experience from the AlcHep Network
    (Elsevier, 2024) Dasarathy, Srinivasan; Tu, Wanzhu; Bellar, Annette; Welch, Nicole; Kettler, Carla; Tang, Qing; Liangpunsakul, Suthat; Gawrieh, Samer; Radaeva, Svetlana; Mitchell, Mack; AlcHepNet; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Background: Recruitment and retention are critical in clinical studies but there are limited objective metrics of trial performance. We tested if development of trial performance metrics will allow for objective evaluation of study quality. Performance metrics were developed using data from the observational cohort (OBS) and randomized clinical trial (RCT) arms of the prospective Alcoholic Hepatitis Network. Methods: Yield-rate (%YR; eligible/screened), recruitment index (RI; mean recruitment time/patient), completion index (CI; average number of days to complete the follow-up/patient), and protocol adherence index (AI; average number of deviations/subject recruited) were determined. Results: 2250 patients (1168 for OBS; 1082 for RCT) were screened across 8 sites. Recruitment in the RCT (57% target) was similar to that in the OBS (59% target). Of those screened, 743 (63.6%) subjects in the OBS and 147 (13.6%) subjects in the RCT were enrolled in the study. In OBS study, 253 (34.1%) subjects, and in the RCT, 68 (46.3%) subjects, completed the study or reached a censoring event. Across all sites (range), YR for OBS was 63.6% (41.3-98.3%) and for RCT was 13.6% (5.5-92.6%); RI for OBS was 1.66 (8.79-19.85) and for RCT was 4.05 (19.76-36.43); CI for OBS was 4.87 (22.6-118.3) and for RCT was 8.75 (27.27-161.5); and AR for OBS was 0.56 (0.08-1.04) and for RCT was 1.55 (0.39-3.21. Factors related to participants, research design, study team, and research sponsors contributed to lower performance metrics. Conclusions: Objective measures of clinical trial performance allow for strategies to enhance study quality and development of site-specific improvement plans.