- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Airway stenosis"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Quantitative assessment of the upper airway in infants and children with subglottic stenosis(Wiley, 2016-05) Zdanski, Carlton; Davis, Stephanie; Hong, Yi; Miao, Di; Quammen, Cory; Mitran, Sorin; Davis, Brad; Niethammer, Marc; Kimbell, Julia; Pitkin, Elizabeth; Fine, Jason; Fordham, Lynn; Vaughn, Bradley; Superfine, Richard; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of MedicineOBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Determine whether quantitative geometric measures and a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model derived from medical imaging of children with subglottic stenosis (SGS) can be effective diagnostic and treatment planning tools. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart and imaging review in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Computed tomography scans (n = 17) of children with SGS were analyzed by geometric and CFD methods. Polysomnograms (n = 15) were also analyzed. Radiographic data were age/weight flow normalized and were compared to an atlas created from radiographically normal airways. Five geometric, seven CFD, and five polysomnography measures were analyzed. Statistical analysis utilized a two-sample t test with Bonferroni correction and area under the curve analysis. RESULTS: Two geometric indices (the ratio of the subglottic to midtracheal airway, the percent relative reduction of the subglottic airway) and one CFD measure (the percent relative reduction of the hydraulic diameter of the subglottic airway) were significant for determining which children with SGS received surgical intervention. Optimal cutoffs for these values were determined. Polysomnography, the respiratory effort-related arousals index, was significant only prior to Bonferroni correction for determining which children received surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric and CFD variables were sensitive at determining which patients with SGS received surgical intervention. Discrete quantitative assessment of the pediatric airway was performed, yielding preliminary data regarding possible objective thresholds for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of disease. This study is limited by its small, retrospective, single-institution nature. Further studies to validate these findings and possibly optimize treatment threshold recommendations are warranted.Item Simulation of laryngotracheal reconstruction with 3D-printed models and porcine cadaveric models(Wiley, 2022-08-09) Falls, Megan; Vincze, Jonathan; Brown, Joshua; Witsberger, Chelsey; Discolo, Christopher; Partain, Matthew; Rosen, Philip; Ting, Jonathan; Zopf, David; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of MedicineObjectives: Laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) is a complex operation used to treat subglottic stenosis. The use of simulator models is a valuable tool in surgical trainee education, particularly for operations such as LTR that are less common outside high-volume centers. Three-dimensional (3D) printing of the human airway may provide an effective and more accessible alternative to porcine cadaveric models. The objective of this study is to compare the educational value of a 3D-printed model and a porcine cadaveric model as LTR simulation methods. Methods: Simulated LTR procedures were completed by 12 otolaryngology residents and a faculty physician on the cadaveric model and the 3D-printed simulator model. Both models were evaluated by fellowship-trained pediatric otolaryngologists to establish construct validity. Pre-procedure surveys of participants evaluated confidence and attitude toward models and post-procedure surveys evaluated confidence, overall impressions, relevance, content validity, and face validity. Results: Participants reported a similar mean increase in confidence after performing LTR on the 3D-printed model (14%) and cadaveric model (11%). Participants rated both models similarly for utility as an overall training tool and in teaching surgical planning and improving operative techniques. However, participants found the 3D-printed model more useful for teaching anatomy (p = .047). Conclusion: 3D-printed models have practical benefits over cadaveric models; they do not decompose and can be custom made to model a disease state such as subglottic stenosis. Participants reported a similar mean increase in confidence after using either simulation. The 3D-printed model is a promising simulation candidate as it compares well to an animal model and has the advantage of being more anatomically true to pediatric patients.