Browsing by Subject "Adverse social exposome"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adverse Social Exposome by Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) Neuropathology for a National Cohort of Brain Donors within the Neighborhoods Study
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Kind, Amy J. H.; Bendlin, Barbara B.; Keller, Sarah A.; Powell, W. Ryan; DeWitt, Amanda; Cheng, Yixuan; Chamberlain, Luke; Lyons Boone, Brittney; Miller, Megan J.; Vik, Stacie M.; Abner, Erin L.; Alosco, Michael L.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Bakulski, Kelly M.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bateman, James R.; Beach, Thomas G.; Bennett, David A.; Brewer, James B.; Carrion, Carmen; Chodosh, Joshua; Craft, Suzanne; Croff, Raina; Fabio, Anthony; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Goldstein, Felicia; Henderson, Victor W.; Karikari, Thomas; Kofler, Julia; Kucharska-Newton, Anna M.; Lamar, Melissa; Lanata, Serggio; Lepping, Rebecca J.; Lingler, Jennifer H.; Lockhart, Samuel N.; Mahnken, Jonathan D.; Marsh, Karyn; Meyer, Oanh L.; Miller, Bruce L.; Morris, Jill K.; Neugroschl, Judith A.; O'Connor, Maureen K.; Paulson, Henry L.; Perrin, Richard J.; Pierce, Aimee; Raji, Cyrus A.; Reiman, Eric M.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Rissman, Robert A.; Rodriguez Espinoza, Patricia; Sano, Mary; Saykin, Andrew J.; Serrano, Geidy E.; Sultzer, David L.; Whitmer, Rachel A.; Wisniewski, Thomas; Woltjer, Randall; Zhu, Carolyn W.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Adverse social exposome (indexed by high national Area Deprivation Index [ADI]) is linked to structural inequities and increased risk of clinical dementia diagnosis, yet linkage to ADRD neuropathology remains largely unknown. Early work from single site brain banks suggests a relationship, but assessment in large national cohorts is needed to increase generalizability and depth, particularly for rarer neuropathology findings. Objective: Determine the association between adverse social exposome by ADI and ADRD neuropathology for brain donors from 21 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) brain banks as part of the on‐going Neighborhoods Study. Methods: All brain donors in participating sites with neuropathology data deposited at the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) and identifiers for ADI linkage (N = 8,637; Figure 1) were included. Geocoded donor addresses were linked to time‐concordant national ADI percentiles for year of death, categorized into standard groupings of low (ADI 1‐19), medium (20‐49) and high (50‐100) ADI. Neuropathological findings were drawn from NACC and reflected standard assessment practices at time of donation. Logistic regression models, adjusted for sex and age at death, assessed relationships between high ADI and neuropathology findings. Results: Of the N = 8,637 brain donors (Table 1), 2,071 of 2,366 assessed (88%) had AD pathology by NIA‐AA criteria; 4,197 of 6,929 assessed (61%) had cerebral amyloid angiopathy; 2582 of 8092 assessed (32%) had Lewy body pathology; 391 of 2351 assessed (17%) had non‐AD tauopathy; and 586 of 1680 assessed (35%) had TDP‐43 pathology. 2,126(25%) were high ADI; 3,171(37%) medium ADI and 3,340(38%) low ADI with 51% female and average age at death of 81.9 years. As compared to low ADI donors, high ADI brain donors had adjusted odds = 1.35 (95% CI = 0.98‐1.86, p‐value = 0.06) for AD pathology; 1.10 (0.98–1.25, p = 0.11) for cerebral amyloid angiopathy; 1.37 (1.21–1.55, p<0.01) for Lewy body; 1.09 (0.83–1.44, p = 0.53) for non‐AD tauopathy; and 1.40 (1.08‐1.81, p = 0.01) for TDP‐43 pathology (Table 2). Conclusions: This first‐in‐field study provides evidence that the adverse social exposome (high ADI) is strongly associated with an increased risk of Lewy body, an increased risk of TDP‐43, and a trend towards increased AD pathology in a national cohort of brain donors.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Over‐Representation of Extremely Wealthy Neighborhood Social Exposomes for Brain Donors within Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Brain Banks assessed by the Neighborhoods Study
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Kind, Amy J. H.; Bendlin, Barbara B.; Powell, W. Ryan; DeWitt, Amanda; Cheng, Yixuan; Chamberlain, Luke; Sharrow, Jessica; Lyons Boone, Brittney; Abner, Erin L.; Alosco, Michael L.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Bakulski, Kelly M.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bateman, James R.; Beach, Thomas G.; Bennett, David A.; Brewer, James B.; Carrion, Carmen; Chodosh, Joshua; Craft, Suzanne; Croff, Raina; Fabio, Anthony; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Goldstein, Felicia; Henderson, Victor W.; Karikari, Thomas K.; Kofler, Julia; Kucharska-Newton, Anna M.; Lamar, Melissa; Lanata, Serggio; Lepping, Rebecca J.; Lingler, Jennifer H.; Lockhart, Samuel N.; Mahnken, Jonathan D.; Marsh, Karyn; Meyer, Oanh L.; Miller, Bruce L.; Morris, Jill K.; Neugroschl, Judith A.; O'Connor, Maureen K.; Paulson, Henry L.; Perrin, Richard J.; Pettigrew, Corinne; Pierce, Aimee; Raji, Cyrus A.; Reiman, Eric M.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Rissman, Robert A.; Rodriguez Espinoza, Patricia; Sano, Mary; Saykin, Andrew J.; Serrano, Geidy E.; Soldan, Anja; Sultzer, David L.; Whitmer, Rachel A.; Wisniewski, Thomas; Woltjer, Randall; Zhu, Carolyn W.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Adverse social exposome (indexed by national Area Deprivation Index [ADI] 80‐100 or ‘high ADI’) is linked to structural inequities and increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Twenty percent of the US population resides within high ADI areas, predominantly in inner cities, tribal reservations and rural areas. The percentage of brain donors from high ADI areas within the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) brain bank system is unknown. Objective: Determine ADI for brain donors from 21 ADRC sites as part of the on‐going Neighborhoods Study. Methods: All brain donors in participating ADRC sites with NACC neuropathology data and personal identifiers for ADI linkage (N = 8,637) were included (Figure 1). Geocoded donor addresses were linked to time‐concordant ADI percentiles for year of death. Results: Overall, only 5.6% of ADRC brain donors (N = 488) resided in a high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhood at death. The remaining donors resided in more advantaged neighborhoods, with nearly 40% of donors living in the wealthiest quintile of neighborhoods, and over 300 brain donors originating from the wealthiest 1% of US neighborhoods (Figure 2). Donors from high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhoods identified as 87% White (n = 424), 11% Black (55), 1% Multiracial (6) and <1% other/unknown race (3), with 1% Hispanic (5). None identified as American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian. In comparison, donors from low ADI neighborhoods were 94% White (n = 7680), 3% Black (273), 1% Multiracial (75), <1% American Indian/Alaska Native (11), <1% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian (60), and <1% other/unknown race (50), with 3% Hispanic (230). Sex distribution was similar (54%, 51% female, respectively). Inclusion of high ADI donors varied dramatically across the 21 ADRC brain banks from a low of 0.6% to high of 20% of all a site’s donors (Figure 3). Conclusions: ADI was determined for over 8,600 brain donors in the ADRC system, demonstrating a marked over‐representation of donors from very low ADI (extremely wealthy) neighborhoods, in addition to site‐to‐site variability. This is the first time a comprehensive cross‐sectional social exposome assessment of this nature has been performed, opening windows for additional mechanistic study of the social exposome on brain pathology. Life course ADI assessments are on‐going.