ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Ablation"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ganglionated plexi and ligament of Marshall ablation reduces atrial vulnerability and causes stellate ganglion remodeling in ambulatory dogs
    (Elsevier, 2016-10) Zhao, Ye; Jiang, Zhaolei; Tsai, Wei-Chung; Yuan, Yuan; Chinda, Kroekkiat; Choi, Eue-Keun; Fishbein, Michael C.; Lin, Shien-Fong; Chen, Peng-Sheng; Everett, Thomas H.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Simultaneous activation of the stellate ganglion (SGNA), the ligament of Marshall (LOM) and the ganglionated plexi (GP) often precedes the onset of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT). Objective To test the hypothesis that ablation of the LOM and the superior left GP (SLGP) reduces atrial vulnerability and results in remodeling of the stellate ganglion. Methods Nerve activity was correlated to PAT and ventricular rate (VR) at baseline, after ablation of the LOM and SLGP, and after AF. Neuronal cell death was assessed with Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end label (TUNEL) staining. Results There were 4±2 PAT episodes per day in controls. None were observed in the ablation group; even though SGNA and VR increased from 2.2 μV (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.2 – 3.3 μV) and 80 bpm (CI 68 – 92 bpm) at baseline to 3.0 μV (CI 2.6 – 3.4 μV, p=0.046) and 90 bpm (CI 75 – 108 bpm, p=0.026) after ablation, and to 3.1 μV (CI 1.7 – 4.5 μV, p=0.116) and 95 bpm (CI 79 – 110 bpm, p=0.075) after AF. There was an increase in TH-negative cells in the ablation group and a 19.7% (CI, 8.6 – 30.8%) TUNEL-positive staining in both the left and right SG. None were observed in the control group. Conclusion LOM and SLGP ablation caused LSG remodeling and cell death. There was reduced correlation of the VR response and PAT to SGNA. These findings support the importance of SLGP and LOM in atrial arrhythmogenesis.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Role of Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Management of Pancreatic Cancer: An Endoscopic Oncologist Perspective
    (MDPI, 2023-06-18) Dahiya, Dushyant Singh; Chandan, Saurabh; Ali, Hassam; Pinnam, Bhanu Siva Mohan; Gangwani, Manesh Kumar; Al Bunni, Hashem; Canakis, Andrew; Gopakumar, Harishankar; Vohra, Ishaan; Bapaye, Jay; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Sharma, Neil R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with an aggressive clinical course. Patients with pancreatic cancer are usually asymptomatic until significant progression of their disease. Additionally, there are no effective screening guidelines for pancreatic cancer in the general population. This leads to a delay in diagnosis and treatment, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and low survival rates. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is an indispensable tool for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. In the modern era, with exponential advancements in technology and device innovation, EUS is also being increasingly used in a variety of therapeutic interventions. In the context of pancreatic cancer where therapies are limited due to the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis, EUS-guided interventions offer new and innovative options. Moreover, due to their minimally invasive nature and ability to provide real-time images for tumor localization and therapy, they are associated with fewer complication rates compared to conventional open and laparoscopic approaches. In this article, we detail the most current and important therapeutic applications of EUS for pancreatic cancer, namely EUS-guided Fine Needle Injections, EUS-guided Radiotherapy, and EUS-guided Ablations. Furthermore, we also discuss the feasibility and safety profile of each intervention in patients with pancreatic cancer to provide gastrointestinal medical oncologists, radiation and surgical oncologists, and therapeutic endoscopists with valuable information to facilitate patient discussions and aid in the complex decision-making process.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University