- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "ALT"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) influences survival in soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review with meta-analysis(BMC, 2019-03-14) Lawlor, Rita T.; Veronese, Nicola; Pea, Antonio; Nottegar, Alessia; Smith, Lee; Pilati, Camilla; Demurtas, Jacopo; Fassan, Matteo; Cheng, Liang; Luchini, Claudio; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineAlternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) is a telomerase-independent mechanism used by a broad range of neoplasms to maintain telomere length, permitting uncontrolled replication during their progression. ALT has been described in different types of sarcoma, but a comprehensive analysis of its clinical significance is still lacking. Therefore, we provide here the first meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: We searched SCOPUS and PubMed through July 2018 to identify all studies that investigated the prognostic role of ALT in sarcomas. We considered the risk of death (risk ratio, RR) calculated as the number of death vs. total participants during follow-up in ALT+ versus ALT- patients as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR), adjusted for the maximum number of covariates available, using ALT- patients as reference. RESULTS: Eight articles comprising a total of 551 patients with sarcomas (226 ALT+ and 325 ALT-) were selected. The ALT+ group showed a higher mitotic count and a higher tumor grade compared with the ALT- group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, we demonstrate a strong impact of ALT on survival. In fact, ALT+ patients showed a statistically significant higher risk of death than ALT- patients, when also considering data from multivariate analyses (RR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.96; p = 0.003; HR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.22-3.38; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ALT is associated with an increased risk of death in patients with sarcoma. In these neoplasms, ALT should be taken into account for a precise prognostic stratification and design of potential therapeutic strategies.Item Heavy Consumption of Alcohol is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes in Patients With Idiosyncratic Drug-induced Liver Injury Compared to Non-Drinkers(Elsevier, 2018-05) Dakhoul, Lara; Ghabril, Marwan; Gu, Jiezhun; Navarro, Victor; Chalasani, Naga; Serrano, Jose; Medicine, School of MedicineBACKGROUND & AIMS: The relationship between alcohol consumption and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is not well understood. We investigated the relationship between heavy consumption of alcohol and characteristics and outcomes of patients with DILI enrolled in the Drug-induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study. METHODS: We collected data from 1198 individuals with definite, highly likely, or probable DILI enrolled in the DILIN study from September 2004 through April 2016. At enrollment, all participants were asked about alcohol consumption; those with any alcohol consumption during previous 12 months were asked to complete the Skinner questionnaire to assess drinking history. Heavy consumption of alcohol was defined as more than 3 drinks, on average, per day by men or more than 2 drinks, on average, per day by women. RESULTS: Of the 601 persons who reported consuming at least 1 alcoholic drink in the preceding 12 months, 348 completed the Skinner questionnaire and 80 reported heavy consumption of alcohol. Heavy drinkers were younger (average age, 42 years) than non-drinkers (average age, 49 years) and a higher proportion were men (63% of heavy drinkers vs 35% of nondrinkers) (P < .01 for each comparison). Anabolic steroids were the most common cause of DILI among heavy drinkers (in 13% vs 2% in non-drinkers) (P < .001). Heavy drinkers had significantly higher peak serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (1323 U/L) than non-drinkers (754 U/L) (P = .02) and higher levels of bilirubin (16.1 mg/dL vs 12.7 mg/dL in non-drinkers) (P = .03) but there was no significant difference in liver-related death or liver transplantation between heavy drinkers (occurred in 10%) vs non-drinkers (occurred in 6%) (P = .18). CONCLUSION: In an analysis of data from the DILIN, we found anabolic steroids to be the most common cause of DILI in individuals who are heavy consumers of alcohol. Compared to non-drinkers, DILI was not associated with a greater proportion of liver-related deaths or liver transplantation in heavy drinkers.Item Relationship Between Characteristics of Medications and Drug-Induced Liver Disease Phenotype and Outcome(Elsevier B.V., 2014-09) Vuppalanchi, Raj; Gotur, Raghavender; Reddy, K. Rajender; Fontana, Robert J.; Ghabril, Marwan; Kosinski, Andrzej S.; Gu, Jiezhun; Serrano, Jose; Chalasani, Naga; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineBackground & Aims: It is not known if specific characteristics of medication are associated with type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or outcome. We examined the relationships among select characteristics of medications and DILI phenotype and outcome. Methods: We analyzed 383 cases of DILI caused by a single orally administered prescription agent from the DILI Network Prospective Study with causalities of definite, highly likely, or probable. Relationship of daily dosage (≥ 50 mg vs. ≤ 49 mg), preponderance of hepatic metabolism (≥50% vs <50%), or Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) class (1–4, based on solubility and metabolism of the drug) were compared with clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results: Compared to cases of DILI in the <50 mg/day group, those associated with daily dosages ≥50 mg had shorter latency (median 38 days vs 56 days; P=.03) and a different biochemical pattern of liver injury (P=.04); no differences in pattern of injury, recovery, severity, or outcome were observed. Patients with DILI caused by medications with or without preponderant hepatic metabolism did not differ in clinical characteristics or outcomes. Compared to other classes of BDDCS, DILI caused by BDDCS class 1 medications had significantly longer latency (P<.001) and greater proportion of hepatocellular injury (P=.001). However, peak liver biochemical values and patients’ time to recovery, disease severity, and outcomes did not differ among the 4 BDDCS classes. Conclusions: Characteristics of medications (dosage, hepatic metabolism, and solubility) are associated with features of DILI such as latency and pattern of liver injury, but not with recovery, severity, or outcome.