Browsing by Subject "5-Choice"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Engagement for Alcohol Escalates in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task After Intermittent Access
    (bioRxiv, 2023-12-01) Starski, Phillip; Siegle, Addyson; Hopf, Frederic; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Uncontrollable binge drinking is becoming an increasingly prevalent issue in our society. This is a factor that plays a role in the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD). AUD impacts 15 million Americans annually, with approximately 88,000 dying from alcohol related deaths. There are several aspects of AUD that encourage a strong dependence on alcohol. Impulsivity, motivation, and attention are the primary behavioral facets we contribute to AUD. Many past studies have used the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-Choice) to analyze these types of behaviors using sugar as the reward. We have recently published a study where alcohol was used as a reward in the 5-Choice. 48 mice were trained to respond for alcohol in the 5-Choice, and the analyses for these animals were originally categorized by their alcohol preference and consumption. Upon looking at the data, we became more interested in a new way to classify these mice into groups. High engaged (HE) and low engaged (LE) mice were classified based on their number of correct responses in the last five late-stage sessions. During early-stage training, mice began to separate themselves into two groups based on their interaction with the task. The high-engaged (HE) mice were much more engaged with the task by having a high number of trials and correct responses, as well as a much lower percentage of omissions. The low engaged (LE) mice were not as engaged, this was apparent because of their lower number of trials and correct responses. They also had a much higher percentage of omissions in comparison to HE mice. LE mice presented no significant changes in late-stage training, while HE mice began responding and engaging more. These mice went through a period of intermittent access (IA), where they were allowed to drink alcohol in their cage for 3 weeks. After intermittent access, LE mice increased their responding which suggests an increase in motivation for alcohol as a reward. Engagement analysis presents two clearly different groups, one being motivated to work for alcohol and the other not wanting to work for this reward. These two distinct phenotypes in the 5-Choice could be used to model alcohol motivated behavior, which could help us further understand AUD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Engagement for Alcohol Escalates in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task After Intermittent Access
    (Elsevier, 2024) Starski, Phillip; Siegle, Addyson; Hopf, Frederic; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Excessive intake plays a significant role in the development of alcohol use disorder and impacts 15 million Americans annually, with approximately 88,000 dying from alcohol related deaths. Several facets we contribute to alcohol use disorder include impulsivity, motivation, and attention. Previous studies have used the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-Choice) to analyze these types of behaviors using sugar, but recently we have published using 10% alcohol as the reward. This study analyzed 48 mice that were trained to respond for alcohol in the 5-Choice. All mice distributed and analyzed first by alcohol preference and then by consumption. Here, we became interested in a new classification called “engagement”. High-engaged and low-engaged mice were determined by the number of correct responses during final Late-Stage training sessions. Interestingly, during Early-Stage training, the mice began to separate themselves into two groups based on their interaction with the task. Throughout both training stages, high-engaged mice displayed a greater number of trials and correct responses, as well as a lower percentage of omissions compared to low-engaged mice. Following three weeks of intermittent access homecage drinking, low-engaged mice showed greater increase in perseverative responding relative to high-engaged. Additionally, low-engaged mice decreased their reward and correct latencies compared to high-engaged mice suggesting an increase in motivation for alcohol. Overall, engagement analysis presents two clearly different groups, with only one being motivated to work for alcohol. These two distinct phenotypes in the 5-Choice could be used to model alcohol motivated behavior, which could help us further understand alcohol use disorder.