Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/4428

Browse

Browsing Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics by Subject "3D stereophotogrammetry"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Precision and accuracy assessment of single and multicamera three-dimensional photogrammetry compared with direct anthropometry
    (Allen Press, 2022) Staller, Sable; Anigbo, Justina; Stewart, Kelton; Dutra, Vinicius; Turkkahraman, Hakan; Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, School of Dentistry
    Objectives: To assess the precision and accuracy of single-camera photogrammetry (SCP) and multicamera photogrammetry (MCP) compared with direct anthropometry (DA). Materials and methods: A total of 30 participants were recruited, and 17 soft tissue landmarks were identified and used to complete a total of 16 measurements. Using SCP and MCP, two three-dimensional (3D) images were acquired from each participant. All 3D measurements and direct measurements were measured twice by the same operator to assess intraexaminer repeatability. Intraclass coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer agreement of the methods. Nonparametric bootstrap analyses were used to compare the means of the measurements among the three methods. Results: All three methods showed excellent intraexaminer repeatability (ICCs > 0.90), except interpupillary distance (ICC = 0.86) measured by SCP. Both SCP and MCP showed excellent interexaminer agreement (ICCs > 0.90), except interpupillary distance (ICC = 0.79), left gonion-pogonion (ICC = 0.74), and columella-subnasale-labrale superior angle (ICC = 0.86) measured by SCP. Overall, there was good agreement between methods, except for columella-subnasale-labrale superior angle (ICC = 0.40) between SCP and MCP. Conclusions: Both SCP and MCP techniques were found to be reliable and valid options for 3D facial imaging. SCP produced slightly larger mean values for several measurements, but the differences were within a clinically acceptable range. Because of the larger margin of errors, measurements including the gonial area and subnasale should be assessed with caution.