2021 IUSM Education Day
Permanent URI for this collection
Scholarly works virtually presented at the second annual IUSM Education Day conference on April 22, 2021.
Browse
Browsing 2021 IUSM Education Day by Subject "anatomy"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item An Investigation of the Metacognitive Awareness of Postbaccalaureate Premedical Students at Indiana University School of Medicine(2021-04-22) Craven, Da'Quan D.; Byram, Jessica N.BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medical school curriculum is tasked with producing lifelong self-directed learners, a set of characteristics requiring strong metacognitive skills. Metacognitive skills directly impact students’ metacognition, which is their ability to understand and regulate their own thinking and learning. It may then be postulated that metacognition may be key in distinguishing students that require a postbaccalaureate program from those that do not. Metacognition has two critical domains: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation, each of which contain multiple subprocesses. Metacognitive knowledge includes knowing strategies for learning, when to use those strategies, and knowing oneself as a learner. Metacognitive regulation includes strategies for planning, monitoring, evaluating, and debugging learning strategies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate: 1) the impact of a graduate TBL course on students’ metacognitive awareness, and 2) the relationship between metacognition and course performance. Methods Students enrolled in a TBL graduate histology course at Indiana University took part in this study. Students completed a 19-item Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) at the beginning (MAI1) and end of the semester (MAI2). The MAI has two domains, Knowledge (8 items) and Regulation (11 items), where items are rated on a 5-point scale from “not at all typical of me” to “very typical of me.” Free response questions asked about knowledge and study abilities, plans for studying in histology and how study skills and abilities have improved across the semester. Finally, students completed a voluntary reflection about their examination performance after the first unit exam. Differences between MAIs were investigated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman's correlations explored the relationship between MAI and final course grades. MAI free responses and exam reflection were analyzed using thematic analysis. Responses were coded using a conceptual framework of metacognition based on processes of knowledge and regulation. Results Thirty-one (94%) students completed both MAIs. There were no differences between MAI1 and MAI2 scores and there was no relationship between MAI1 or MAI2 and final course grades. The Wilcoxon test demonstrated a significant difference between the Knowledge and Regulation domains for MAI1 (p=0.002) and MAI2 (p=0.001) where students reported the items in the Knowledge domain were more typical of them than items in the Regulation domain. There were no differences across the domains between the two timepoints. Students reported initial hesitation and difficulty with learning histology content in a lecture-free, flipped classroom approach. Students discussed plans for approaching studying, but many reported modifying study strategies throughout the semester. However, few students discussed active learning strategies that would allow them to evaluate and assess their knowledge prior to assessments. Conclusion While the MAI failed to demonstrate any improvement in metacognition, students reported an increase in their ability to adapt their study strategies to the content and learning materials. Differences in knowledge of cognition and regulation suggests educators in TBL classrooms may need to provide students with additional resources and strategies to regulate their learning. Future studies aim to investigate the validity of the MAI for measuring metacognition in anatomy courses.Item Metacognition in the Middle: Mismatch between Anticipated and Actual Exam Grades of Allied Health Anatomy Students(2021-04-22) Cale, Andrew S.; McNulty, Margaret A.INTRODUCTION: Accurate evaluation of one’s knowledge and performance is a key metacognitive skill critical to success in the classroom. Students who lack this skill may over-estimate their knowledge and under-prepare for exams, resulting in poor academic performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the ability of allied health students to evaluate their exam performance in an anatomy course to identify which groups, if any, need support with this skill. METHODS: In an IRB-approved study, first-year physician assistant (PA), physical therapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT) students (n=129) participated in a doctoral-level anatomy course. This course covered human anatomy through asynchronous lectures and synchronous virtual labs (due to COVID). Students’ anatomical knowledge was assessed via four exams throughout the course. Prior to the start of the course and again at the end, students were invited to complete a de-identified pre-survey including the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI), a 52-item survey that assesses metacognition. Throughout the course, students were asked to reflect on their exam performances (anticipated grade, actual grade, and satisfaction) using a modified Likert scale. For analyses, students were divided into terciles based on their mean combined exam performance. Reflections and MAI scores were then compared across terciles in SPSS using Kruskal-Wallis H test. RESULTS: Average exam scores of high (93%±2.0), middle (86%±2.7), and low-performers (74%±4.6) were significantly different from each other (p<0.01). A total of113 (88%) and 59 (46%) students completed the pre- and post-surveys, respectively, resulting in 52 matched pairs (40%). Overall, students significantly improved their metacognition (p<0.01). Reflection participation ranged from 67% to 97%. When asked how their actual grade measured against their anticipated grade, high- and middle-performers’ anticipated grades were similar to each other but significantly higher than those of low-performers (p<0.01 for three exams). High-performers reported significantly greater exam satisfaction than middle- and low-performers on two exams (p<0.01). The performance terciles scored similarly across all metacognition subcategories in the post-survey except declarative knowledge, the factual knowledge of structures and concepts that provides the foundation for higher-order thinking (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, middle-performers appear to have the greatest mismatch between their anticipated grade, actual grade, and exam satisfaction when compared to high- and low-performers. These students anticipate strong exam performances, but appear to fall short, leaving them less satisfied. This metacognitive disconnect may be related to how students evaluate their knowledge. Students seem to evaluate their progress based on their declarative knowledge, which may not accurately represent their ability to apply that knowledge. SIGNIFICANCE: Metacognitive activities that improve student self-evaluation skills should be implemented in anatomy courses to minimize the metacognitive disconnect between anticipated and actual exam performance.