IU Center for Bioethics Faculty Scholarship

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/424

In support of open access, free culture and the progression of scholarship in the field of bioethics, the Indiana University Center for Bioethics is committed to sharing products of scholarly activities, teaching and community engagement.

Browse

Browsing IU Center for Bioethics Faculty Scholarship by Subject "Aristotle"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pomponazzi and Aquinas on the Intellective Soul
    (Saint Louis University, 2005-01) Eberl, Jason T.
    One of Thomas Aquinas’s primary philosophical concerns is to provide an account of the nature of a human soul. He bases his account on Aristotle’s De anima [DA], wherein Aristotle gives an account of “soul” (psuchē) as divided into three distinct types: vegetative, sensitive, and intellective. Aristotle defines an intellective soul as proper to human beings and the only type of soul that may potentially exist separated from a material body. Aquinas argues that an intellective soul is indeed separable from its body and conceives of it as essentially, or unqualifiedly (simpliciter), immortal and separable from its body, and relatively (secundum quid) mortal and conjoined to its body. Pietro Pomponazzi (1462-1525), a Renaissance philosopher concerned with ridding neo-Aristotelianism of Platonic or Averroistic influences, criticizes Aquinas’s account as not being properly Aristotelian and having been influenced by Platonism. In this paper, I will present summaries of Aquinas’s arguments concerning an intellective soul’s essential immortality, as well as Pomponazzi’s criticisms of Aquinas’s position. I then propose ways in which Aquinas may respond to these criticisms.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Potentiality, Possibility, and the Irreversibility of Death
    (Philosophy Education Society, Inc., 2008-09) Eberl, Jason T.
    In this paper, I will consider the case of cryopreservation. A central conceptual focus throughout this discussion is the purportedly irreversible nature of death and the criteria by which a human body is considered to be informed by a rational soul.
Although these works may be freely accessible on the World Wide Web and may not include any statement about copyright, the U.S. Copyright Act nevertheless provides that such works are protected by copyright. Users must assume that works are protected by copyright until they learn otherwise.