Browsing by Author "von der Lohe, Elisabeth"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factor XIII Val34Leu polymorphism and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease
    (Springer, 2014-10) Kreutz, Rolf P.; Bitar, Abbas; Owens, Janelle; Desta, Zeruesenay; Breall, Jeffrey A.; von der Lohe, Elisabeth; Sinha, Anjan; Vatta, Matteo; Nystrom, Perry; Flockhart, David A.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Factor XIII (FXIII) is necessary for cross linking of fibrin strands and generation of stable fibrin clot. FXIII Val34Leu is a common genetic single nucleotide polymorphism that has been associated with accelerated fibrin stabilization and reduced rate of fibrinolysis. The contribution of Val34Leu to long term risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with coronary stenting has not been conclusively established. The objective of the study was to examine the effects of Val34Leu on fibrin generation, platelet aggregation, and long term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease who were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were enrolled (n = 211). Light transmittance aggregometry and plasma fibrin clot formation using thrombelastography (TEG) were determined. Genotyping of Val34Leu was performed using Taqman assay. Clinical events during follow up were recorded. Homozygous carriers of 34Leu variant had significantly shorter fibrin clot formation time as compared to wild type individuals (TEG K: 1.27 ± 0.3 vs. 1.68 ± 1.1 min, p = 0.011). The Val34Leu variant was associated with gene dose dependent increased risk of MI (log rank, p = 0.002) or occurrence of composite of MI and CV death (log rank, p = 0.005) with highest event rates observed in homozygous carriers of 34Leu. In summary, FXIII Val34Leu polymorphism was associated with increased rate of fibrin stabilization in homozygous carriers of the variant and may increase risk of recurrent MI and death in patients with angiographically established coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Femoral Artery Closure Devices vs Manual Compression During Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    (Elsevier, 2022-06-29) Kreutz, Rolf P.; Phookan, Sujoy; Bahrami, Hamid; Sinha, Anjan K.; Breall, Jeffrey A.; Revtyak, George E.; Ephrem, Georges; Zenisek, Joseph R.; Frick, Kyle A.; Jaradat, Ziad A.; Abu Romeh, Ibrahim S.; O’Leary, Brian A.; Ansari, Hamza Z.; Ferguson, Andrew D.; Zawacki, Kevin E.; Hoque, Mohammad Z.; Iqtidar, Ali F.; Lambert, Nathan D.; von der Lohe, Elisabeth; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Femoral arterial access remains widely used despite recent increase in radial access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various femoral artery closure devices have been developed and are commonly used to shorten vascular closure times, with variable rates of vascular complications observed in clinical trials. We sought to examine the rates of contemporary outcomes during diagnostic catheterization and PCI with the most common femoral artery closure devices. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone either diagnostic catheterization alone (n = 14,401) or PCI (n = 11,712) through femoral artery access in the Indiana University Health Multicenter Cardiac Cath registry. We compared outcomes according to closure type: manual compression, Angio-Seal, Perclose, or Mynx. Access complications and bleeding outcomes were measured according to National Cardiovascular Data ​Registry standard definitions. Results: The use of any vascular closure device as compared to manual femoral arterial access hold was associated with a significant reduction in vascular access complications and bleeding events in patients who underwent PCI. No significant difference in access-site complications was observed for diagnostic catheterization alone. Among closure devices, Perclose and Angio-Seal had a lower rate of hematoma than Mynx. Conclusions: The use of femoral artery access closure devices is associated with a reduction in vascular access complication rates as compared to manual femoral artery compression in patients who undergo PCI.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fibrin clot strength measured by thrombelastography and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention
    (Thieme, 2017-01-26) Kreutz, Rolf P.; Schmeisser, Glen; Maatman, Benjamin; Schaffter, Andrea; Sinha, Anjan; von der Lohe, Elisabeth; Breall, Jeffrey A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Sex on Outcomes With Femoral Artery Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    (Wiley, 2024-12-19) Anderson, Wesley L.; Torabi, Asad J.; O'leary, Brian A.; Breall, Jeffrey A.; Sinha, Anjan K.; Jaradat, Ziad A.; Morris, Michelle C.; Frick, Kyle A.; Romeh, Ibrahim A.; Iqtidar, Ali F.; von der Lohe, Elisabeth; Kreutz, Rolf P.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and aims: Femoral artery access is widely used despite recent increase in radial access for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Femoral artery closure devices are used to shorten vascular closure time and reduce bleeding. We sought to examine sex-based outcomes of femoral artery vascular closure devices (VCD) in patients undergoing PCI. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone PCI (n = 11,415) in the Indiana University Health Multicenter Cardiac Cath registry using femoral artery access. Clinical outcomes were compared between VCD and manual compression and analyzed according to sex. Patients with cardiogenic shock and left ventricular support devices were excluded. Results: The use of any vascular closure device as compared to femoral artery manual compression was associated with a reduction in 72-h bleeding events (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.87). With manual compression, women had higher rates of 72-h bleeding as compared to men (4.5% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Women demonstrated greater absolute risk reduction in 72-h bleeding events with use of VCD as compared to men (2.8% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). For women, VCD were associated with lower risk of access site bleeding (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24-0.8), hematoma (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.2-0.63), and vascular complications (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.72). Use of VCD was associated with lower risk of in-hospital death (adjusted OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.28-0.58; p < 0.001) in multivariable regression analysis. Conclusion: Women derive more benefit from use of femoral artery VCD during PCI than men with greater reduction in bleeding rates, access site hematoma, and vascular complications.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Simultaneous administration of high-dose atorvastatin and clopidogrel does not interfere with platelet inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention
    (Dove Medical Press, 2016) Kreutz, Rolf P.; Breall, Jeffrey A.; Sinha, Anjan; von der Lohe, Elisabeth; Kovacs, Richard J.; Flockhart, David A.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Reloading with high-dose atorvastatin shortly before percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce periprocedural myonecrosis. There has been a concern that statins that are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 may interfere with clopidogrel metabolism at high doses. The impact of simultaneous administration of high doses of atorvastatin and clopidogrel on the efficacy of platelet inhibition has not been established. METHODS: Subjects (n=60) were randomized to receive atorvastatin 80 mg together with clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (n=28) versus clopidogrel 600 mg alone (n=32) at the time of PCI. Platelet aggregation was measured at baseline, 4 hours after clopidogrel loading dose, and 16-24 hours after clopidogrel loading dose by light transmittance aggregometry using adenosine diphosphate as agonist. RESULTS: Platelet aggregation was similar at baseline in both the atorvastatin and the control groups (adenosine diphosphate 10 µM: 57%±19% vs 61%±21%; P=0.52). There was no significant difference in platelet aggregation between the atorvastatin and the control groups at 4 hours (37%±18% vs 39%±21%; P=0.72) and 16-24 hours post-clopidogrel loading dose (35%±17% vs 37%±18%; P=0.75). No significant difference in incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis was observed between the atorvastatin and control groups (odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.37-2.8). CONCLUSION: High-dose atorvastatin given simultaneously with clopidogrel loading dose at the time of PCI does not significantly alter platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. Statin reloading with high doses of atorvastatin at the time of PCI appears to be safe without adverse effects on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00979940).