- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Zia, Zahra"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Black Adult Patients With Acute Liver Failure Are Sicker and More Likely to Undergo Liver Transplantation Than White Patients(Wiley, 2019) Nephew, Lauren; Zia, Zahra; Ghabril, Marwan; Orman, Eric; Lammert, Craig; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineRacial and ethnic differences in the presentation and outcomes of patients wait‐listed with acute liver failure (ALF) have not been explored. Adult patients with ALF wait‐listed for liver transplantation (LT) from 2002 to 2016 were investigated using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Clinical characteristics and causative etiologies were compared between white, black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with ALF who were wait‐listed as status 1. A competing risk analysis was used to explore differences in LT and wait‐list removal rates. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to explore differences in 1‐year posttransplant survival. There were 8208 patients wait‐listed with a primary diagnosis of ALF; 4501 were wait‐listed as status 1 (55.3% of whites, 64.4% of blacks, 51.6% of Hispanics, 40.7% of Asians; P < 0.001). Black patients had higher bilirubin and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease at wait‐listing than other groups. White patients were the most likely to have acetaminophen toxicity as a causative etiology, whereas black patients were the most likely to have autoimmune liver disease. Black patients were significantly more likely to undergo LT than white patients (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.08‐1.30). There was no difference in wait‐list removal because of death or clinical deterioration among racial/ethnic groups. The 1‐year posttransplant survival was lowest in black patients (79.6%) versus white (82.8%), Hispanic (83.9%), and Asian (89.3%) patients (P = 0.02). In conclusion, etiologies of ALF vary by race and ethnicity. Black patients with ALF were more likely to be wait‐listed as status 1 and undergo LT than white patients, but they were sicker at presentation. The 1‐year posttransplant survival rate was lowest among black patients.Item An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study(Oxford, 2020-10) Temnykh, Lindsey M; Rahal, Mahmoud A; Zia, Zahra; Al-Haddad, Mohammad A; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is increasingly utilized to enhance the cytological yield of sampling solid lesions, but its superiority over existing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) platforms has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and procedural outcomes of FNB using a new Franseen-tip needle to that of a traditional FNA in sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance. Methods Consecutive patients with solid lesions referred for EUS-FNB sampling were included. Procedure-related outcomes were collected prospectively including patient demographics, number of passes performed, diagnostic sample adequacy, adverse events, and recovery time. The Acquire needle was used to sample all lesions in the study group. Consecutive EUS-FNA procedures performed to sample solid lesions using the Expect needle were utilized as controls. Results There were 180 patients undergoing EUS-FNB compared to 183 patients undergoing EUS-FNA procedures for solid-lesion sampling. The procedure time was significantly shorter in patients who underwent FNB compared to FNA (mean: 37.4 vs 44.9 minutes, P < 0.001). Significantly fewer passes were performed in the FNB cohort compared to the FNA group (mean: 2.9 vs 3.8, P < 0.001). The cytologic diagnostic yield was significantly higher in the FNB group compared to the FNA group (98.3% vs 90.2%, P = 0.003). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the FNB and FNA groups (1.1% vs 0.5%, P = 0.564). Conclusions An FNB-exclusive approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance is safe and feasible, and may result in fewer overall passes, shorter procedure time, and improved diagnostic adequacy. FNB may replace FNA as the primary sampling modality of choice in all solid lesions.Item Sex disparities in waitlisting and liver transplant for acute liver failure(Elsevier, 2020-11-01) Nephew, Lauren D.; Zia, Zahra; Ghabril, Marwan; Orman, Eric; Lammert, Craig; Kubal, Chandrashekhar; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground & aims: Sex disparities in liver transplantation (LT) for chronic liver disease have been described. It is unclear if similar disparities exist for acute liver failure (ALF). Methods: Adults waitlisted for LT from 2002 to 2016 with ALF were investigated using the United Network of Organ Sharing database. Clinical characteristics and causative aetiologies were compared between men and women who were waitlisted Status-1. Differences in LT, waitlist removal, and 1-year post-transplant survival were explored. Results: Of 8,408 patients waitlisted for LT with ALF, 41.3% of men and 63.9% of women were waitlisted Status-1 (p <0.001). Women had significantly higher international normalised ratio, higher frequency of grade 3-4 hepatic encephalopathy, and different aetiologies of ALF than men. On univariable analysis, women were less likely to undergo LT (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97) and were more likely to die or be removed from the waitlist as a result of clinical deterioration (SHR 1.14; 95% CI 1.002-1.30) than men. The disparities in LT (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.03) and death/clinical deterioration (SHR 1.13; 95% CI 0.99-1.29) were no longer significant on multivariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in 1-year post-transplant survival between men and women. Conclusions: Women with ALF are more likely to be waitlisted Status-1 than men. There were no clear disparities in LT or waitlist removal. Sex differences in LT and waitlist removal were attenuated on fully adjusted models, suggesting that these disparities may in part be mitigated by Status-1 listing. Lay summary: Women with acute liver failure appear to be sicker than men and more often require urgent Status-1 waitlisting. There were no sex disparities in waitlist removal because of clinical deterioration or liver transplantation. This is in contrast to chronic liver disease, where sex disparities exist. The Status-1 waitlisting that women with acute liver failure receive may in part mitigate sex disparities in liver transplantation.