Browsing by Author "Zhou, Jianhong"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identification of Intrinsic Disorder in Complexes from the Protein Data Bank
    (ACS Publications, 2020-07-14) Zhou, Jianhong; Oldfield, Christopher J.; Yan, Wenying; Shen, Bairong; Dunker, A.Keith; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine
    Background: Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs) lack stable structures in solution, yet often fold upon binding with partners. IDPs or IDRs are highly abundant in all proteomes and represent a significant modification of sequence → structure → function paradigm. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) includes complexes containing disordered segments bound to globular proteins, but the molecular mechanisms of such binding interactions remain largely unknown. Results: In this study, we present the results of various disorder predictions on a nonredundant set of PDB complexes. In contrast to their structural appearances, many PDB proteins were predicted to be disordered when separated from their binding partners. These predicted-to-be-disordered proteins were observed to form structures depending upon various factors, including heterogroup binding, protein/DNA/RNA binding, disulfide bonds, and ion binding. Conclusions: This study collects many examples of disorder-to-order transition in IDP complex formation, thus revealing the unusual structure–function relationships of IDPs and providing an additional support for the newly proposed paradigm of the sequence → IDP/IDR ensemble → function.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intrinsically disordered domains: Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships
    (Wiley, 2019-07-12) Zhou, Jianhong; Oldfield, Christopher J.; Yan, Wenying; Shen, Bairong; Dunker, A. Keith; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine
    Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein–protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence–disorder–function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intrinsically disordered proteins link alternative splicing and post-translational modifications to complex cell signaling and regulation
    (Elsevier, 2018) Zhou, Jianhong; Zhao, Suwen; Dunker, A. Keith; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine
    Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs and IDRs) lack well-defined tertiary structures, yet carry out various important cellular functions, especially those associated with cell signaling and regulation. In eukaryotes, IDPs and IDRs contain the preferred loci for both alternative splicing (AS) and many post-translational modifications (PTMs). Furthermore, AS and/or PTMs at these loci generally alter the signaling outcomes associated with these IDPs or IDRs, where the functional cooperation of these three features is named the IDP-AS-PTM toolkit. However, the prevalence of such functional modulations remains unknown. Also, the signal-altering mechanisms by which AS, and PTMs modulate function and the extent to which AS and PTMs collaborate in their signaling modulations have not been well defined for particular protein examples. Here we focus on three important signaling and regulatory IDR-containing protein families in humans, namely G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are transmembrane proteins, the nuclear factors of activated T-cells (NFATs), which are transcription factors (TFs), and the Src family kinases (SFKs), which are signaling enzymes. The goal here is to determine how AS and PTMs individually alter the outcomes of the signaling carried out by the various IDRs and to determine whether AS and PTMs work together to bring about differential cellular responses. We also present data indicating that a wide range of other signaling IDPs or IDRs undergo both AS- and PTM-based modifications, suggesting that they, too, likely take advantage of signal outcome modulations that result from collaboration between these two events. Hence, we propose that the widespread cooperation of IDPs, AS and/or PTMs provides a IDP-AS-PTM toolkit and substantially contributes to the vast complexity of eukaryotic cell signaling systems.