Browsing by Author "Zheng, Guangrong"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of the nicotinic agonist varenicline, nicotinic antagonist r-bPiDI, and DAT inhibitor R-modafinil on co-use of ethanol and nicotine in female P rats.
    (Springer, 2018-05) Maggio, Sarah E.; Saunders, Meredith A.; Baxter, Thomas A.; Nixon, Kimberly; Prendergast, Mark A.; Zheng, Guangrong; Crooks, Peter; Dwoskin, Linda P.; Slack, Rachel D.; Newman, Amy H.; Bell, Richard L.; Bardo, Michael T.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Rationale: Co-users of alcohol and nicotine are the largest group of polysubstance users worldwide. Commonalities in mechanisms of action for ethanol (EtOH) and nicotine proposes the possibility of developing a single pharmacotherapeutic to treat co-use. Objectives: Toward developing a preclinical model of co-use, female alcohol-preferring (P) rats were trained for voluntary EtOH drinking and i.v. nicotine self-administration in three phases: (1) EtOH alone (0 vs. 15%, 2-bottle choice); (2) nicotine alone (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, active vs. inactive lever); and (3) concurrent access to both EtOH and nicotine. Using this model, we examined the effects of (1) varenicline, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) partial agonist with high affinity for the α4β2 subtype; (2) r-bPiDI, a subtype-selective antagonist at α6β2* nAChRs; and (3) (R)-modafinil, an atypical inhibitor of the dopamine transporter (DAT). Results: In Phases 1 and 2, pharmacologically relevant intake of EtOH and nicotine was achieved. In the concurrent access phase (Phase 3), EtOH consumption decreased while nicotine intake increased relative to Phases 1 and 2. For drug pretreatments, in the EtOH access phase (Phase 1), (R)-modafinil (100 mg/kg) decreased EtOH consumption, with no effect on water consumption. In the concurrent access phase, varenicline (3 mg/kg), r-bPiDI (20 mg/kg), and (R)-modafinil (100 mg/kg) decreased nicotine self-administration, but did not alter EtOH consumption, water consumption, or inactive lever pressing. Conclusions: These results indicate that therapeutics which may be useful for smoking cessation via selective inhibition of α4β2 or α6β2* nAChRs, or DAT inhibition, may not be sufficient to treat EtOH and nicotine co-use.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An improved model of ethanol and nicotine co-use in female P rats: Effects of naltrexone, varenicline, and the selective nicotinic α6β2* antagonist r-bPiDI
    (Elsevier, 2018-12) Maggio, Sarah E.; Saunders, Meredith A.; Nixon, Kimberly; Prendergast, Mark A.; Zheng, Guangrong; Crooks, Peter A.; Dwoskin, Linda P.; Bell, Richard L.; Bardo, Michael T.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Background Although pharmacotherapies are available for alcohol (EtOH) or tobacco use disorders individually, it may be possible to develop a single pharmacotherapy to treat heavy drinking tobacco smokers by capitalizing on the commonalities in their mechanisms of action. Methods Female alcohol-preferring (P) rats were trained for EtOH drinking and nicotine self-administration in two phases: (1) EtOH alone (0 vs. 15% EtOH, 2-bottle choice) and (2) concomitant access, during which EtOH access continued with access to nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, i.v.) using a 2-lever choice procedure (active vs. inactive lever) in which the fixed ratio (FR) requirement was gradually increased to FR30. When stable co-use was obtained, rats were pretreated with varying doses of naltrexone, varenicline, or r-bPiDI, an α6β2* subtype-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist shown previously to reduce nicotine self-administration. Results While EtOH intake was initially suppressed in phase 2 (co-use), pharmacologically relevant intake for both substances was achieved by raising the “price” of nicotine to FR30. In phase 2, naltrexone decreased EtOH and water consumption but not nicotine intake; in contrast, naltrexone in phase 1 (EtOH only) did not significantly alter EtOH intake. Varenicline and r-bPiDI in phase 2 both decreased nicotine self-administration and inactive lever pressing, but neither altered EtOH or water consumption. Conclusions These results indicate that increasing the “price” of nicotine increases EtOH intake during co-use. Additionally, the efficacy of naltrexone, varenicline, and r-bPiDI was specific to either EtOH or nicotine, with no efficacy for co-use. Nevertheless, future studies on combining these treatments may reveal synergistic efficacy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Therapy-Induced Senescence: Opportunities to Improve Anticancer Therapy
    (Oxford, 2021-10) Prasanna, Pataje G.; Citrin, Deborah E.; Hildesheim, Jeffrey; Ahmed, Mansoor M.; Venkatachalam, Sundar; Riscuta, Gabriela; Xi, Dan; Zheng, Guangrong; van Deursen, Jan; Goronzy, Jorg; Kron, Stephen J.; Anscher, Mitchell S.; Sharpless, Norman E.; Campisi, Judith; Brown, Stephen L.; Niedernhofer, Laura J.; O’Loghlen, Ana; Georgakilas, Alexandros G.; Paris, Francois; Gius, David; Gewirtz, David A.; Schmitt, Clemens A.; Abazeed, Mohamed E.; Kirkland, James L.; Richmond, Ann; Romesser, Paul B.; Lowe, Scott W.; Gil, Jesus; Mendonca, Marc S.; Burma, Sandeep; Zhou, Daohong; Coleman, C. Norman; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Cellular senescence is an essential tumor suppressive mechanism that prevents the propagation of oncogenically activated, genetically unstable, and/or damaged cells. Induction of tumor cell senescence is also one of the underlying mechanisms by which cancer therapies exert antitumor activity. However, an increasing body of evidence from preclinical studies demonstrates that radiation and chemotherapy cause accumulation of senescent cells (SnCs) both in tumor and normal tissue. SnCs in tumors can, paradoxically, promote tumor relapse, metastasis, and resistance to therapy, in part, through expression of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. In addition, SnCs in normal tissue can contribute to certain radiation- and chemotherapy-induced side effects. Because of its multiple roles, cellular senescence could serve as an important target in the fight against cancer. This commentary provides a summary of the discussion at the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Radiation, Senescence, and Cancer (August 10-11, 2020, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) regarding the current status of senescence research, heterogeneity of therapy-induced senescence, current status of senotherapeutics and molecular biomarkers, a concept of “one-two punch” cancer therapy (consisting of therapeutics to induce tumor cell senescence followed by selective clearance of SnCs), and its integration with personalized adaptive tumor therapy. It also identifies key knowledge gaps and outlines future directions in this emerging field to improve treatment outcomes for cancer patients.