Browsing by Author "Wurtz, L. Daniel"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item EWSR1::NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma in bone-case report and review of the literature(Elsevier, 2022-11) Shaheen, Muhammad; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Brocken, Eric G.; Warmke , Laura M.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineRound cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions are rare and entirely distinct from Ewing sarcoma with canonical fusion. Of these, EWSR1::NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma (ENS) has emerged as a distinct entity. Whereas few cases of ENS have been reported, clinical data regarding biologic behavior remain limited. In order to further characterize this rare sarcoma, we herein report a case of ENS arising in the tibia of a 21-year-old male, who initially presented with a several-year history of lower leg pain. Imaging showed a large, expansile and marrow-replacing lesion with focal cortical breakthrough. Biopsy showed monomorphic epithelioid and spindle cells with clear cell change, mimicking several entities including a myoepithelial tumor and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was positive for EWSR1 gene rearrangement with selective amplification of the 5′ probe, and next-generation sequencing confirmed the presence of a EWSR1::NFATC2 translocation. The patient underwent radical resection of the tibial mass and showed no evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease at 8 months post resection. Given the fully malignant potential of this tumor, knowledge of this rare entity is essential to ensure proper management and prevent misdiagnosis.Item Increased Number of Medical Comorbidities Associated With Increased Risk of Presenting With Pathological Femur Fracture in Metastatic Bone Disease(University of Iowa Health Care, 2023) Poirier, Jon-Luc; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Collier, Christopher D.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: Many cancers metastasize to bone and may lead to pathologic fracture or impending pathologic fracture. Prophylactically stabilizing bones before fracture has been shown to be more cost-effective with improved outcomes. Many studies have examined risk factors for pathological fracture, with radiographic and functional pain data serving as predominant indicators for surgery. Conditions associated with poor bone health and increased risk of fracture in the non-oncologic population, including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, renal disease, smoking, corticosteroid use, and osteoporosis, have not been studied in the context of metastatic disease. Characterization of these factors could help providers identify candidates for prophylactic stabilization thereby reducing the number of completed pathological fractures. Methods: 298 patients over the age of 40 with metastatic bone disease of the femur treated between 2010-2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients without complete medical documentation or with non-metastatic diagnoses were excluded. 186 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 74 patients who presented with pathological femur fracture and 112 patients who presented for prophylactic stabilization. Patient demographics and comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, COPD, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, osteoporosis, active tobacco or corticosteroid use, and use of anti-resorptive therapy were collected. Descriptive statistics were compiled, with univariable analysis by Mann-Whitney or chisquared testing. Multiple logistic regression was then performed to identify the most significant patient variables for presenting with completed fracture. Results: On univariable analysis, patients with COPD were more likely to present with pathologic fracture (19/32 [59%] compared to 55/154 [36%], p = 0.02). A trend emerged for patients with an increasing number of comorbidities (28/55 [51%] for 2+ comorbidities compared to 18/61 [29%] with zero comorbidities, p = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, patients with two or more comorbidities (OR: 2.49; p=0.02) were more likely to present with a femur fracture. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that those with an increasing number of comorbidities may be at increased risk for pathologic fracture. This study raises the possibility that patient factors and/ or comorbidities alter bone strength and/or pain experiences and may guide orthopaedic oncologists weighing prophylactic stabilization of femur lesions.Item Integrative Multi-OMICs Identifies Therapeutic Response Biomarkers and Confirms Fidelity of Clinically Annotated, Serially Passaged Patient-Derived Xenografts Established from Primary and Metastatic Pediatric and AYA Solid Tumors(MDPI, 2022-12-30) Pandya, Pankita H.; Jannu, Asha Jacob; Bijangi-Vishehsaraei, Khadijeh; Dobrota, Erika; Bailey, Barbara J.; Barghi, Farinaz; Shannon, Harlan E.; Riyahi, Niknam; Damayanti, Nur P.; Young, Courtney; Malko, Rada; Justice, Ryli; Albright, Eric; Sandusky, George E.; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Collier, Christopher D.; Marshall, Mark S.; Gallagher, Rosa I.; Wulfkuhle, Julia D.; Petricoin, Emanuel F.; Coy, Kathy; Trowbridge, Melissa; Sinn, Anthony L.; Renbarger, Jamie L.; Ferguson, Michael J.; Huang, Kun; Zhang, Jie; Saadatzadeh, M. Reza; Pollok, Karen E.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineEstablishment of clinically annotated, molecularly characterized, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from treatment-naïve and pretreated patients provides a platform to test precision genomics-guided therapies. An integrated multi-OMICS pipeline was developed to identify cancer-associated pathways and evaluate stability of molecular signatures in a panel of pediatric and AYA PDXs following serial passaging in mice. Original solid tumor samples and their corresponding PDXs were evaluated by whole-genome sequencing, RNA-seq, immunoblotting, pathway enrichment analyses, and the drug−gene interaction database to identify as well as cross-validate actionable targets in patients with sarcomas or Wilms tumors. While some divergence between original tumor and the respective PDX was evident, majority of alterations were not functionally impactful, and oncogenic pathway activation was maintained following serial passaging. CDK4/6 and BETs were prioritized as biomarkers of therapeutic response in osteosarcoma PDXs with pertinent molecular signatures. Inhibition of CDK4/6 or BETs decreased osteosarcoma PDX growth (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05) confirming mechanistic involvement in growth. Linking patient treatment history with molecular and efficacy data in PDX will provide a strong rationale for targeted therapy and improve our understanding of which therapy is most beneficial in patients at diagnosis and in those already exposed to therapy.Item Ninety Percent or Greater Tumor Necrosis Is Associated With Survival and Social Determinants of Health in Patients With Osteosarcoma in the National Cancer Database(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Richardson, Spencer M.; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Collier, Christopher D.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: The histologic response of osteosarcoma to chemotherapy is commonly cited as a prognostic factor and typically graded as the percent necrosis of the tumor at the time of surgical resection. Few studies, to our knowledge, have examined the relationship of tumor necrosis relative to other factors. Existing studies are limited by prolonged enrollment periods or analysis of patient subsets without the strongest predictor of mortality: metastasis at diagnosis. Additionally, the definitive threshold value for a good histologic response is commonly set at more than 90% tumor necrosis with little evidence; some authors advocate other values. Question/purposes: (1) Are there alternative cutoff values for a good response to chemotherapy in a large, national cohort of contemporarily treated patients with osteosarcoma? (2) How does the association of histologic response to survival in osteosarcoma compare with other clinicopathologic factors? (3) What patient and clinical factors are associated with the histologic response? Methods: We identified 2006 patients with osteosarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a registry that includes 70% of all new cancers diagnosed in the United States with 90% follow-up. Patients were excluded for missing documentation of percent tumor necrosis (21% [425 of 2006]) or if definitive resection was not performed (< 1% [1 of 2006]). A total of 1580 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean follow-up duration of 37 ± 22 months. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, stratified by the percent tumor necrosis after chemotherapy, was performed for the 5-year period. Other covariates examined were sex, race, socioeconomic score composite, insurance type, Charlson/Deyo score, distance from the hospital, and location (metropolitan, urban, or rural). Clinical and sociodemographic data including patient-identified race from the patient's medical record is input into the NCDB by certified registrars. The NCDB only allows coding of one primary race for each patient; thus, most of our patients were grouped as White or Black race and the remaining were grouped as Other for our analysis. A multiple Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of percent necrosis compared with other demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment effects on survival. Finally, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics associated with percent necrosis. Results: Five-year overall survival for patients with histologic gradings of 90% to 94% necrosis (70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.6% to 79.7%) and 95% to 100% necrosis (74% [95% CI 68% to 80.3%) was not different between groups (p = 0.47). A comparison of histologic responses below 90% necrosis found no difference in survival between patients with decreasing histologic response (p > 0.05). Necrosis of less than 90% was associated with worse survival (HR 2.00 [95% CI 1.58 to 2.52]; p < 0.001 compared with more than 90% necrosis), and factors most associated with poor survival were metastasis (HR 2.85 [95% CI 2.27 to 3.59]; p < 0.001) and skip metastasis at the time of diagnosis (HR 2.52 [95% CI 1.64 to 3.88]; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors, social determinants of health were negatively associated with percent necrosis of 90% or more, including uninsured status (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.92]; p = 0.02 compared with private insurance) and lower socioeconomic status composite (OR for the lowest first and second quartiles were 0.63 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.90]; p = 0.01 and 0.70 [95% CI 0.50 to 0.96]; p = 0.03, respectively). Race other than White or Black (OR 0.61 [95% CI 0.40 to 0.94]; p = 0.02 compared with White race) was also negatively associated with percent necrosis of more than 90% after controlling for available covariates. Conclusion: This study suggests that a cutoff of 90% necrosis provides the best prognostic value for patients with osteosarcoma undergoing chemotherapy. Other threshold values did not show different survival benefits. Sociodemographic factors were associated with histologic response less than 90%. These associations must be carefully understood not as cause and effect but likely demonstrating the effects of health disparities and access to care. Although we controlled for multiple variables in our analysis, broad variables such as race may have been associated with histologic response due to unaccounted confounders. Medical providers should be aware of these associations to ensure equitable access and delivery of care because access to care may be responsible for these associations. Future studies should examine potential drivers of this observation, such as a delay in presentation or deviation from standard of care practices.Item Systems Biology Approach Identifies Prognostic Signatures of Poor Overall Survival and Guides the Prioritization of Novel BET-CHK1 Combination Therapy for Osteosarcoma(MDPI, 2020-08-26) Pandya, Pankita H.; Cheng, Lijun; Saadatzadeh, M. Reza; Bijangi-Vishehsaraei, Khadijeh; Tang, Shan; Sinn, Anthony L.; Trowbridge, Melissa A.; Coy, Kathryn L.; Bailey, Barbara J.; Young, Courtney N.; Ding, Jixin; Dobrota, Erika A.; Dyer, Savannah; Elmi, Adily; Thompson, Quinton; Barghi, Farinaz; Shultz, Jeremiah; Albright, Eric A.; Shannon, Harlan E.; Murray, Mary E.; Marshall, Mark S.; Ferguson, Michael J.; Bertrand, Todd E.; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Batra, Sandeep; Li, Lang; Renbarger, Jamie L.; Pollok, Karen E.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineOsteosarcoma (OS) patients exhibit poor overall survival, partly due to copy number variations (CNVs) resulting in dysregulated gene expression and therapeutic resistance. To identify actionable prognostic signatures of poor overall survival, we employed a systems biology approach using public databases to integrate CNVs, gene expression, and survival outcomes in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult OS patients. Chromosome 8 was a hotspot for poor prognostic signatures. The MYC-RAD21 copy number gain (8q24) correlated with increased gene expression and poor overall survival in 90% of the patients (n = 85). MYC and RAD21 play a role in replication-stress, which is a therapeutically actionable network. We prioritized replication-stress regulators, bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BETs), and CHK1, in order to test the hypothesis that the inhibition of BET + CHK1 in MYC-RAD21+ pediatric OS models would be efficacious and safe. We demonstrate that MYC-RAD21+ pediatric OS cell lines were sensitive to the inhibition of BET (BETi) and CHK1 (CHK1i) at clinically achievable concentrations. While the potentiation of CHK1i-mediated effects by BETi was BET-BRD4-dependent, MYC expression was BET-BRD4-independent. In MYC-RAD21+ pediatric OS xenografts, BETi + CHK1i significantly decreased tumor growth, increased survival, and was well tolerated. Therefore, targeting replication stress is a promising strategy to pursue as a therapeutic option for this devastating disease.Item What Is the Prevalence of Clinically Important Findings Among Incidentally Found Osseous Lesions?(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Blackburn, Collin W.; Richardson, Spencer M.; DeVita, Robert R.; Dong, Oliver; Faraji, Navid; Wurtz, L. Daniel; Collier, Christopher D.; Getty, Patrick J.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: Patients with incidentally found musculoskeletal lesions are regularly referred to orthopaedic oncology. Most orthopaedic oncologists understand that many incidental findings are nonaggressive and can be managed nonoperatively. However, the prevalence of clinically important lesions (defined as those indicated for biopsy or treatment, and those found to be malignant) remains unknown. Missing clinically important lesions can result in harm to patients, but needless surveillance may exacerbate patient anxiety about their diagnosis and accrue low-value costs to the payor. Questions/purposes: (1) What percentage of patients with incidentally discovered osseous lesions referred to orthopaedic oncology had lesions that were clinically important, defined as those receiving biopsy or treatment or those found to be malignant? (2) Using standardized Medicare reimbursements as a surrogate for payor expense, what is the value of reimbursements accruing to the hospital system for the imaging of incidentally found osseous lesions performed during the initial workup period and during the surveillance period, if indicated? Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients referred to orthopaedic oncology for incidentally found osseous lesions at two large academic hospital systems. Medical records were queried for the word "incidental," and matches were confirmed by manual review. Patients evaluated at Indiana University Health between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, and those evaluated at University Hospitals between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, were included. All patients were evaluated and treated by the two senior authors of this study and no others were included. Our search identified 625 patients. Sixteen percent (97 of 625) of patients were excluded because their lesions were not incidentally found, and 12% (78 of 625) were excluded because the incidental findings were not bone lesions. Another 4% (24 of 625) were excluded because they had received workup or treatment by an outside orthopaedic oncologist, and 2% (10 of 625) were excluded for missing information. A total of 416 patients were available for preliminary analysis. Among these patients, 33% (136 of 416) were indicated for surveillance. The primary indication for surveillance included lesions with a benign appearance on imaging and low clinical suspicion of malignancy or fracture. A total of 33% (45 of 136) of these patients had less than 12 months of follow-up and were excluded from further analysis. No minimum follow-up criteria were applied to patients not indicated for surveillance because this would artificially inflate our estimated rate of clinically important findings. A total of 371 patients were included in the final study group. Notes from all clinical encounters with orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic providers were screened for our endpoints (biopsy, treatment, or malignancy). Indications for biopsy included lesions with aggressive features, lesions with nonspecific imaging characteristics and a clinical picture concerning for malignancy, and lesion changes seen on imaging during the surveillance period. Indications for treatment included lesions with increased risk of fracture or deformity, certain malignancies, and pathologic fracture. Diagnoses were determined using biopsy results if available or the documented opinion of the consulting orthopaedic oncologist. Imaging reimbursements were obtained from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2022. Because imaging charges vary across institutions and reimbursements vary across payors, this method was chosen to enhance the comparability of our findings across multiple health systems and studies. Results: Seven percent (26 of 371) of incidental findings were determined to be clinically important, as previously defined. Five percent (20 of 371) of lesions underwent tissue biopsy, and 2% (eight of 371) received surgical intervention. Fewer than 2% (six of 371) of lesions were malignant. Serial imaging changed the treatment of 1% (two of 136) of the patients, corresponding to a rate of one in 47 person-years. Median reimbursements to work up the incidental findings analyzed was USD 219 (interquartile range USD 0 to 404), with a range of USD 0 to 890. Among patients indicated for surveillance, the median annual reimbursement was USD 78 (IQR USD 0 to 389), with a range of USD 0 to 2706. Conclusion: The prevalence of clinically important findings among patients referred to orthopaedic oncology for incidentally found osseous lesions is modest. The likelihood of surveillance resulting in a change of management was low, but the median reimbursements associated with following these lesions was also low. We conclude that after appropriate risk stratification by orthopaedic oncology, incidental lesions are rarely clinically important, and judicious follow-up with serial imaging can be performed without incurring high costs. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.