- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Wonder, Amy Hagedorn"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A Case Study Design Examining New Graduate Registered Nurse Well-Being(2024-01) Zidek, Stephanie Marie; Wonder, Amy Hagedorn; Opsahl, Angela; Reising, Deanna; Rybas, NataliaIn the face of multifarious challenges, including individual stressors, nursing workforce fluctuations, and lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the well-being of new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs) during their initial months of practice is a pivotal concern. This study, employing a qualitative case study design, investigates the wellbeing of NGRNs during their first three months, with the dual objectives of understanding their state of well-being and identifying its facilitators and inhibitors. Data collection involved reflective journaling and structured focus groups with 12 NGRNs from four neighboring hospitals within a large, not-for-profit system over three months. Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis revealed three critical themes elucidating NGRNs’ complex experiences: (1) emotional and physical well-being, (2) interpersonal relations and support, and (3) professional development and work environment. These insights underscore the diverse challenges the NGRN participants experienced during the transition to practice period, as well as identify facilitators (e.g., preceptor impact, peer support, patient interaction, self-care, supportive services) and inhibitors (e.g., disappointment, fatigue, schedule constraints, shiftwork, overwhelmed feelings, stress, and bullying). Derived from participant insights, the findings advocate for nuanced interventions across various nursing disciplines and settings. Recommendations include integrating emotional resilience curricula in nursing schools, promoting adaptive strategies and supportive policies by nursing boards, developing criteria for program support effectiveness by accreditation agencies, and adopting flexible scheduling and supportive environment policies by health organizations. These strategies address key findings such as disappointment, workplace bullying, and shiftwork complications, bridging the expectation-reality gap for NGRNs. This study contributes to the discourse on NGRNs’ well-being, presenting a structured approach for enhanced support and policy adaptations, facilitating an improved transition into the nursing profession. The comprehensive exploration and thematic insights contribute to the understanding and addressing the well-being of NGRNs, providing a roadmap for enhanced support and policy implementation, ultimately aiming to facilitate a successful transition into the nursing profession.Item Examining the relationship between clinical judgment and nursing action in baccalaureate nursing students(2016-07-29) Fedko, Andrea Lauren; Dreifuerst, Kristina Thomas; Ironside, Pamela M.; Reising, Deanna; Wonder, Amy HagedornClinical judgment provides the basis for nurses’ actions and is essential for the provision of safe nursing care. Tanner’s Clinical Judgment Model and its associated instrument, the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) have been used in the discipline of nursing, yet it is unclear if scores on the rubric actually translate to the completion of an indicated nursing action. This is important because clinical judgment involves identifying and responding to patient situations through nursing action, and then evaluation of such actions. The purpose of this observational study was to explore the relationship between clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, and the completion of an indicated nursing action, as measured by a nursing action form. The clinical judgment and completion of an indicated nursing action was measured in 92 participant students at a Midwestern university school of nursing who were enrolled in an adult medical/surgical nursing course that included simulation and debriefing during which scoring occurred. This study explored whether clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, was related to the completion of an indicated nursing action. In addition, this study evaluated whether Responding, as measured by the LCJR was related to the completion of an indicated nursing action. The data revealed that a very weak relationship was present between clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, and the completion of an indicated nursing action; however, these findings were not statistically significant. The data also revealed that a very weak relationship was present between the dimension Responding, and the completion of an indicated nursing action; however, these findings were also not statistically significant. This study expands upon previous clinical judgment research in nursing and identifies a need for additional methods of evaluating clinical judgment in baccalaureate nursing students including action appraisal so that deficiencies are established and targeted for improvement.Item Exploring Evidence-Based Practice Norms Among Bedside Nurses in Magnet-Designated Hospitals: A Q Methodology Study(2023-08) Ramsey, Rachel Anne; Wonder, Amy Hagedorn; Opsahl, Angela; Reising, Deanna; Gonzalez-Mulé, ErikEvidence-based practice (EBP) is a recognized standard of professional nursing due to its positive impact on care quality and patient outcomes. Despite ongoing efforts to maximize EBP at the point of care, current estimates indicate that only 30% of healthcare decisions are evidence-based. Individual and organizational factors are commonly identified for their influences on EBP in nursing, but group factors have been largely unexplored. Group-level factors, such as norms, are essential to investigations of phenomena that occur within multilevel organizations (i.e., hospitals) where individuals work in groups. Understanding the EBP norms that emerge among groups of nurses in direct care roles may support the goal to increase evidence-based nursing care. The purpose of this dissertation study was to explore and describe the EBP norms that exist among groups of RNs who practice at bedside within Magnet-designated hospitals. Magnet-designated hospitals are recognized for their positive EBP cultures and infrastructures that support nurses’ EBP beliefs and goals, making them an ideal context to investigate shared viewpoints about EBP. Eligible Registered Nurses (RNs) were recruited from eight units within two Magnet-designated hospitals in the Midwestern United States. Using Q methodology, the participants’ individual perspectives about EBP were collected, then correlated and interpreted to uncover the shared viewpoints, or EBP norms, that existed within and across the study sites. Multiple EBP norms were discovered within each Magnet-designated hospital: four were found at Site A (Engaged, Overextended, Skeptical, and Reliable) and three were found at Site B (Amenable, Resistant, and Discerning). Two higher-order norms were also discovered (Invested and Marginalized). Differences were observed among these norms, especially regarding nurses’ viewpoints around time for EBP, input on EBP, and trust in EBP. The findings confirm that group-level factors should be considered in the study of evidence-based nursing. They also suggest that Magnet designation alone cannot ensure a unified EBP viewpoint. Consequently, standardized approaches for enhancing EBP should be reexamined, and more holistic interventions should be considered to address the variety of complex EBP viewpoints that exist among RNs who practice at bedside in Magnet-designated hospitals.Item Exploring faculty preparation for and use of debriefing with the debriefing for meaningful learning inventory(2016-07-19) Bradley, Cynthia Diane; Dreifuerst, Kristina Thomas; Ironside, Pamela M.; Wonder, Amy Hagedorn; Friesth, Barbara Manz; Jeffries, Pamela R.Debriefing is the most significant component of simulation, yet the impact of debriefer training for this critical time of learning has not been reported. Although training of debriefers in the use of a structured debriefing method has been recommended by nursing organizations and regulating bodies, a description of the impact of training on the understanding and application of debriefing within nursing programs is largely unknown. Debriefing for Meaningful Learning© (DML) is a structured, evidencebased debriefing method that promotes the development of clinical reasoning among prelicensure nursing students. DML has been adopted for use across the curriculum throughout nursing education. However, little is known regarding how debriefers are trained in this method and how that training impacts their understanding and application of the method. The DML Inventory (DMLI), was developed and tested for this research study, and used to assess and document 234 debriefers’ understanding of the central concepts of DML and subsequent application of DML behaviors during simulation debriefing with prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Statistically significant differences were found between those debriefers who had and had not been trained in DML. Statistically significant differences were also found in the understanding of the DML central concepts, and in the application of DML based on the types of training the debriefers received. viii The data indicate that DML trained debriefers consistently apply more DML behaviors than those who had not received training, and that multiple sources of training resulted in a more consistent application of DML debriefing behaviors. Furthermore, understanding the central concepts of DML resulted in debriefers consistently applying more debriefing behaviors consistent with the DML design. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge of debriefing in nursing education and training in evidence-based debriefing methods, by providing a tested instrument that can be used to assess debriefers using DML. The findings also demonstrate the impact of the type of training on how structured debriefing methods are then implemented in teaching-learning environments, which can be used to improve future training.Item Observational experiential learning facilitated by debriefing for meaningful learning : exploring student roles in simulation(2018-07-25) Johnson, Brandon Kyle; Reising, Deanna L.; Wonder, Amy Hagedorn; Friesth, Barbara Manz; Byrne, Bobbi J.Simulation is an educational strategy used in prelicensure nursing education that has been demonstrated to effectively replace selected clinical experiences. Simulation experiences may include the use of differing roles including the active participant, who makes decisions during the simulation and the passive observer, who watches the simulation unfold. There is a lack of rigorous research testing whether students in the passive observer role during simulations demonstrate and retain knowledge similarly to those in active participant roles. In addition, differences in knowledge applied to a contextually similar case between those who actively participate and passively observe have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between nursing student’s roles in simulation and cognitive knowledge demonstration, retention, and application about two contextually similar cases of respiratory distress. An experimental, pretest-multiple posttest, repeated measures study was conducted with a convenience sample of 119 baccalaureate prelicensure nursing students from a large multi-campus Southwestern university. Two knowledge instruments were administered throughout different stages of the simulation and four weeks later. Associations between role in simulation and scores on the knowledge instruments were examined using t-tests and mixed repeated measures-analysis of variance. Of the 59 active participants and 60 observers, there were no significant differences in knowledge demonstrated or retained after simulation, after debriefing, or four weeks later. Additionally, there were no significant differences in knowledge demonstrated when applied to a contextually similar case after debriefing or four weeks later between active participant and observer. Future research is needed to examine these relationships in larger and more diverse samples and different contextual clinical situations in simulation. These results will contribute to the further testing and implementation of using observation as a strategy for teaching and learning with simulation for nursing and health professions education.Item Understanding of Interprofessional Communication to Impact Patient Safety in the Operating Room: A Grounded Theory Study(2021-11) McNealy, Kimberly Renee; Reising, Deanna L.; Draucker, Claire Burke; Wonder, Amy Hagedorn; Parrish-Sprowl, JohnIntraoperative adverse events (IAEs) due to interprofessional miscommunication continue to occur despite implementation of surgical checklists and focused communication trainings. Much of the previous intraoperative communication research has focused on the content and quantity of interprofessional communication instead of its context and quality, and current communication interventions seem to have varying levels of engagement, effectiveness, and persistence. The purpose of this dissertation study was to explore the psychosocial processes involved during the establishment and maintenance of interprofessional communication surrounding IAEs or potential IAEs in the intraoperative environment and to identify the perceived facilitators and barriers to communication. Twenty surgical team members participated in semi-structured interviews and described their experiences with interprofessional communication during IAEs. Grounded theory methodology was used to identify the central process, Testing the Water, and two subprocesses, Reading the Room and Navigating Hierarchy. Testing the Water describes the situational nature of interprofessional communication as surgical team members navigate factors influencing the context and probable trajectories of surgical cases and the perceptions of professional rights and responsibilities within surgical teams. Participants in this study experienced Testing the Water differently based on their professional roles and tenure; findings were organized around three emerging groups identified as inexperienced nurses, experienced nurses, and surgeons. Interprofessional communication surrounding IAEs occurred for study participants in fluid, iterative phases identified as 1) Recognition, 2) Reconnaissance, 3) Rallying, 4) Reaction, and 5) Resolution. Participants recognized IAEs or potential IAEs, gathered information through reconnaissance, rallied other team members, reacted to stabilize patients, and resolved IAEs through individual or surgical team reflection. Study participants reported using strategies during communication to accomplish two psychosocial goals, preserving the flow of surgical cases, and protecting the ‘face’ of themselves and other surgical team members. Supporting these psychosocial goals through increased psychological safety for all surgical team members potentially leads to more effective, timely surgical team communication. More effective interprofessional communication facilitates the improved situational awareness, collective sensemaking, and integrated team mental models that are critical to coordinated responses to IAEs. The findings of this study suggest practical implications to increase the effectiveness of interprofessional communication in the intraoperative environment.