Browsing by Author "Woerner, Stephanie"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dasiglucagon, a next-generation ready-to-use glucagon analog, for treatment of severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Results of a phase 3, randomized controlled trial
    (Wiley, 2021) Battelino, Tadej; Tehranchi, Ramin; Bailey, Timothy; Dovc, Klemen; Melgaard, Anita; Yager Stone, Jenine; Woerner, Stephanie; von dem Berge, Thekla; DiMeglio, Linda; Danne, Thomas; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Dasiglucagon, a next-generation, ready-to-use aqueous glucagon analog formulation, has been developed to treat severe hypoglycemia in individuals with diabetes. Objective: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dasiglucagon in pediatric individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Participants were children and adolescents (6-17 years) with T1DM. Methods: In this randomized double-blind trial, 42 participants were randomly allocated (2:1:1) to a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of dasiglucagon (0.6 mg), placebo, or reconstituted glucagon (GlucaGen; dosed per label) during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. The primary endpoint was time to plasma glucose (PG) recovery (first PG increase ≥20 mg/dL after treatment initiation without rescue intravenous glucose). The primary comparison was dasiglucagon vs. placebo; glucagon acted as a reference. Results: The median time (95% confidence interval) to PG recovery following SC injection was 10 min (8-12) for dasiglucagon vs. 30 min (20 to -) for placebo (P < .001); the median time for glucagon was 10 min (8-12), which did not include the time taken to reconstitute the lyophilized powder. PG recovery was achieved in all participants in the dasiglucagon and glucagon groups within 20 min of dosing compared to 2 out of 11 patients (18%) with placebo. The most frequent adverse events were nausea and vomiting, as expected with glucagon treatment. Conclusions: Consistent with adult phase 3 trials, dasiglucagon rapidly and effectively restored PG levels following insulin-induced hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with T1DM, with an overall safety profile similar to glucagon.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Long-term Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: One-Year Results From the SENCE Study
    (Sage, 2023) Van Name, Michelle A.; Kanapka, Lauren G.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Miller, Kellee M.; Albanese-O’Neill, Anastasia; Commissariat, Persis; Corathers, Sarah D.; Harrington, Kara R.; Hilliard, Marisa E.; Anderson, Barbara J.; Kelley, Jennifer C.; Laffel, Lori M.; MacLeish, Sarah A.; Nathan, Brandon M.; Tamborlane, William V.; Wadwa, R. Paul; Willi, Steven M.; Williams, Kristen M.; Wintergerst, Kupper A.; Woerner, Stephanie; Wong, Jenise C.; DeSalvo, Daniel J.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Achieving optimal glycemic outcomes in young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is challenging. This study examined the durability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) coupled with a family behavioral intervention (FBI) to improve glycemia. Study design: This one-year study included an initial 26-week randomized controlled trial of CGM with FBI (CGM+FBI) and CGM alone (Standard-CGM) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM), followed by a 26-week extension phase wherein the BGM Group received the CGM+FBI (BGM-Crossover) and both original CGM groups continued this technology. Results: Time in range (70-180 mg/dL) did not improve with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 37%, 52 weeks 41%; Standard-CGM: baseline 41%, 52 weeks 44%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 38%, 52 weeks 40%). All three groups sustained decreases in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 3.4%, 52 weeks 2.0%; Standard-CGM: baseline 4.1%, 52 weeks 2.1%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 4.5%, 52 weeks 1.7%, P-values <.001). Hemoglobin A1c was unchanged with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 8.3%, 52 weeks 8.2%; Standard-CGM: baseline 8.2%, 52 weeks 8.0%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 8.1%, 52 weeks 8.3%). Sensor use remained high (52-week study visit: CGM+FBI 91%, Standard-CGM 92%, BGM-Crossover 88%). Conclusion: Over 12 months young children with T1D using newer CGM technology sustained reductions in hypoglycemia and, in contrast to prior studies, persistently wore CGM. However, pervasive hyperglycemia remained unmitigated. This indicates an urgent need for further advances in diabetes technology, behavioral support, and diabetes management educational approaches to optimize glycemia in young children.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Presentation During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    (Sage, 2022-02) Neyman, Anna; Nabhan, Zeina; Woerner, Stephanie; Hannon, Tamara; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Time spent outside of target glucose range for young children with type 1 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitor study
    (Wiley, 2020-08) DiMeglio, Linda A.; Kanapka, Lauren G.; DeSalvo, Daniel J.; Anderson, Barbara J.; Harrington, Kara R.; Hilliard, Marisa E.; Laffel, Lori M.; Tamborlane, William V.; Van Name, Michelle A.; Wadwa, R. Paul; Willi, Steven M.; Woerner, Stephanie; Wong, Jenise C.; Miller, Kellee M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Aim To assess the associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and sensor glucose metrics in young children with type 1 diabetes, using masked, continuous glucose monitoring data from children aged 2 to < 8 years. Research design and methods The analysis included 143 children across 14 sites in the USA, enrolled in a separate clinical trial. Eligibility criteria were: age 2 to <8 years; type 1 diabetes duration ≥3 months; no continuous glucose monitoring use for past 30 days; and HbA1c concentration 53 to <86 mmol/mol (7.0 to <10.0%). All participants wore masked continuous glucose monitors up to 14 days. Results On average, participants spent the majority (13 h) of the day in hyperglycaemia (>10.0 mmol/l) and a median of ~1 h/day in hypoglycaemia (<3.9 mmol/l). Participants with minority race/ethnicity and higher parent education levels spent more time in target range, 3.9–10.0 mmol/l, and less time in hyperglycaemia. More time in hypoglycaemia was associated with minority race/ethnicity and younger age at diagnosis. Continuous glucose monitoring metrics were similar in pump and injection users. Conclusions Given that both hypo- and hyperglycaemia negatively impact neurocognitive development, strategies to increase time in target glucose range for young children are needed.