Browsing by Author "Wiley, Kevin"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adoption of Health Information Technology Among US Nursing Facilities
    (Elsevier, 2018-12-19) Vest, Joshua R.; Jung, Hye-Young; Wiley, Kevin; Kooreman, Harold; Pettit, Lorren; Unruh, Mark A.; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objectives: Nursing facilities have lagged behind in the adoption interoperable health information technology (i.e. technologies that allow the sharing and use of electronic patient information between different information systems). The objective of this study was to estimate the nationwide prevalence of electronic health record (EHR) adoption among nursing facilities and to identify the factors associated with adoption. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting & participants: We surveyed members of the Society for Post-Acute & Long-Term Care Medicine (AMDA) about their organizations’ health information technology usage and characteristics. Measurements: Using questions adopted from existing instruments, the survey measured nursing home’s EHR adoption, the ability to send, receive, search and integrate electronic information, as well as barriers to usage. Additionally, we linked survey responses to public use secondary data sources to construct measurements for eight determinants known to be associated with organizational adoption: innovativeness, functional differentiation, role specialization, administrative intensity, professionalism, complexity, technical knowledge resources and slack resources. A series of regression models estimated the association between potential determinants and technology adoption. Results: 84% of nursing facilities reported using an EHR. After controlling for all other factors, respondents who characterized their organization as more innovative had more than 6 times the odds (adjusted odds ratio = 6.39; 95%CI = 2.69, 15.21) of adopting an EHR. Organization innovativeness was also associated with an increased odds of being able to send, integrate, and search for electronic information. The most commonly identified barrier to sharing clinical information among nursing facilities with an EHR was a reported absence of interoperability (57%). Conclusions/Implications: An organizational culture that fosters innovation and awareness campaigns by professional societies may facilitate further adoption and effective use of technology. This will be increasingly important as policymakers continue to emphasize the use of EHRs and interoperability to improve the quality of care in nursing facilities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Underrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002–2017)
    (Oxford University Press, 2020-11-01) Wiley, Kevin; Dixon, Brian E.; Grannis, Shaun J.; Menachemi, Nir; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objective: Biomedical informatics attracts few underrepresented racial minorities (URMs) into PhD programs. We examine graduation trends from 2002 to 2017 to determine how URM representation has changed over time. We also examine academic job placements by race and identify individual and institutional characteristics associated with URM graduates being successfully placed in academic jobs. Materials and methods: We analyze a near census of all research doctoral graduates from US-accredited institutions, surveyed at graduation by the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. Graduates of biomedical informatics-related programs were identified using self-reported primary and secondary disciplines. Data are analyzed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions. Results: During the study period, 2426 individuals earned doctoral degrees in biomedical informatics-related disciplines. URM students comprised nearly 12% of graduates, and this proportion did not change over time (2002-2017). URMs included Hispanic (5.7%), Black (3.2%), and others, including multi-racial and indigenous American populations (2.8%). Overall, 82.3% of all graduates accepted academic positions at the time of graduation with significantly more Hispanic graduates electing to go into academia (89.2%; P < .001). URM graduates were more likely to be single (OR = 1.38; P < .05), have a dependent (1.95; P < .01), and not receive full tuition remission (OR = 1.37; P = .05) as a student. URM graduates accepting an academic position were less likely to be a graduate of a private institution (OR = 0.70; P < .05). Discussion and conclusion: The proportion of URM candidates among biomedical informatics doctoral graduates has not increased over time and remains low. In order to improve URM recruitment and retention within academia, leaders in biomedical informatics should replicate strategies used to improve URM graduation rates in other fields.