Browsing by Author "Wiesepape, Courtney"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Autobiographical memory in schizophrenia: The role of metacognition
    (Elsevier, 2021) Mediavilla, Roberto; López-Arroyo, Manuel; Gómez-Arnau, Jorge; Wiesepape, Courtney; Lysaker, Paul H.; Lahera, Guillermo; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Background: Autobiographical memory is an important component of declarative memory, which refers to the ability to recall personal events that happened in the past. This requires that the person senses or experiences himself/herself in the past (i.e., conscious recollection). For people with schizophrenia, conscious recollection can be particularly difficult, resulting in difficulty accessing detailed, specific autobiographical information. Our hypothesis is that the ability to monitor and think about one's cognitive processes (metacognition) is a requisite for conscious recollection, and that it mediates the association between having schizophrenia and recalling fewer specific, personal memories. Methods: Participants were 30 adults with schizophrenia and 30 matched healthy controls. The main assessment instruments were the Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated (MAS-A) and the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). Severity of symptoms was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Cognitive performance was measured with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP). Mediation analysis was conducted following Baron and Kenny's procedure. Results: People with schizophrenia had more semantic associations and fewer specific memories than controls in the AMT. Metacognition (MAS-A total score) partially mediated the association between having schizophrenia and recalling fewer specific past events, even after controlling for cognitive impairment as a potential confounding source. Conclusions: Metacognitive ability, which can be improved with available programs, intervenes in the process of accessing autobiographical memories in people with schizophrenia. Practical implications of this finding are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Co-occurring Deficits in Clinical and Cognitive Insight in Prolonged Schizophrenia- Spectrum Disorders: Relationship to Metacognitive Deficits
    (Oxford University Press, 2021-07-20) Mervis, Joshua E.; Bonfils, Kelsey A.; Cooper, Samuel E.; Wiesepape, Courtney; Lysaker, Paul H.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    People diagnosed with schizophrenia have been broadly observed to experience deficits in clinical and cognitive insight; however, less is understood about how these deficits are related. One possibility is that these deficits co-occur among people when other deficits in cognition are present, such as in executive function, social cognition, and metacognition, which may either promote the development of both forms of poor insight or allow one to negatively influence the other. To explore this possibility, we conducted a cluster analysis using assessments of clinical and cognitive insight among 95 adults with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. As predicted, this analysis yielded a group with concurrently poor clinical and cognitive insight (n = 36). Additional groups were found with concurrently good clinical and cognitive insight (n = 28) and poor clinical insight and good cognitive insight (n = 31). Groups were then compared on assessments of executive function, social cognition, and metacognition. The group with concurrently lower levels of cognitive and clinical insight had significantly poorer metacognition relative to the other groups. In particular, they tended to form more fragmented and less integrated ideas about themselves and others. No differences were found for executive function or social cognition. The result may suggest that while clinical and cognitive insight is partially orthogonal phenomena, relatively lower levels of metacognition, or difficulties forming integrated ideas about oneself and others, maybe a condition leading to the confluence of lower clinical and cognitive insight. Interventions targeting metacognition may be of particular use for this group.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Promoting Meaning and Recovery for Psychosis: Comparison of Metacognitively-Oriented Psychotherapists and Clinicians in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
    (Dove Press, 2023-10-18) Faith, Laura; Wiesepape, Courtney; Kukla, Marina; Lysaker, Paul; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Recovery from psychosis is an expected and desired outcome in psychiatric rehabilitation that may involve subjective outcomes related to personal recovery. While a considerable amount of qualitative research has examined patients' experience of recovery oriented approaches, there are less studies examining clinicians' perspectives. Examining the clinician point of view is important for both supporting clinicians within recovery-oriented practice, as well as for understanding underlying therapeutic processes. The aims of this study were to explore clinician experience of offering different psychiatric rehabilitation treatments for individuals with psychosis, and to understand similarities and differences of clinicians whose work differed in its recovery emphasis. Methods: Open-ended interviews were conducted with 10 psychotherapists providing Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT), a recovery oriented form of integrative psychotherapy focused on subjective aspects of recovery, and 10 clinicians providing standard psychiatric rehabilitation services. Results: Thematic analysis revealed important similarities and differences between these two groups of providers. There were seven themes found for MERIT therapists: Comfort with uncertainty, Emphasis on collaboration, Being part of therapeutic change, Connecting with clients, Emphasis on patient autonomy, Experiencing growth, and Therapist use of self-awareness. There were four themes found for psychiatric rehabilitation clinicians: Value of a structured approach, Focus on a strengths-based approach, Witnessing behavioral change, and Building rapport to support the work. Discussion: As expected, both similarities and differences arose between clinician groups. Results indicated that both groups focused on the therapeutic relationship and monitoring progress and outcomes. Unexpectedly, MERIT therapists reported growth as well as comfort with uncertainty. These findings suggest that MERIT is a a psychotherapy that offers unique opportunities for creative and flexible exploration of meaning and agency that is both challenging and rewarding for clinicians. Implications for supporting healthy clinician practice and the development of services are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Social Dysfunction in Psychosis Is More Than a Matter of Misperception: Advances From the Study of Metacognition
    (Frontiers Media, 2021-10-14) Lysaker, Paul H.; Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit; Wiesepape, Courtney; Huling, Kelsey; Musselman, Aubrie; Lysaker, John T.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Many with psychosis experience substantial difficulties forming and maintaining social bonds leading to persistent social alienation and a lack of a sense of membership in a larger community. While it is clear that social impairments in psychosis cannot be fully explained by symptoms or other traditional features of psychosis, the antecedents of disturbances in social function remain poorly understood. One recent model has proposed that deficits in social cognition may be a root cause of social dysfunction. In this model social relationships become untenable among persons diagnosed with psychosis when deficits in social cognition result in inaccurate ideas of what others feel, think or desire. While there is evidence to support the influence of social cognition upon social function, there are substantial limitations to this point of view. Many with psychosis have social impairments but not significant deficits in social cognition. First person and clinical accounts of the phenomenology of psychosis also do not suggest that persons with psychosis commonly experience making mistakes when trying to understand others. They report instead that intersubjectivity, or the formation of an intimate shared understanding of thoughts and emotions with others, has become extraordinarily difficult. In this paper we explore how research in metacognition in psychosis can transcend these limitations and address some of the ways in which intersubjectivity and more broadly social function is compromised in psychosis. Specifically, research will be reviewed on the relationship between social cognitive abilities and social function in psychosis, including measurement strategies and limits to its explanatory power, in particular with regard to challenges to intersubjectivity. Next, we present research on the integrated model of metacognition in psychosis and its relation to social function. We then discuss how this model might go beyond social cognitive models of social dysfunction in psychosis by describing how compromises in intersubjectivity occur as metacognitive deficits leave persons without an integrated sense of others' purposes, relative positions in the world, possibilities and personal complexities. We suggest that while social cognitive deficits may leave persons with inaccurate ideas about others, metacognitive deficits leave persons ill equipped to make broader sense of the situations in which people interact and this is what leaves them without a holistic sense of the other and what makes it difficult to know others, share experiences, and sustain relationships. The potential of developing clinical interventions focused on metacognition for promoting social recovery will finally be explored.