Browsing by Author "Walker, Kimberly"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How We Do It Optimizing the Histological Mapping of Thin Delicate Tissue in Mohs Micrographic Surgery—The “Paper Cut Technique”
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2019-09) Kunz, Michael; Poynter, Lauren; Walker, Kimberly; Somani, Ally-Khan; Dermatology, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Improved Pathologic response to chemoradiation in MGMT methylated locally advanced rectal cancer
    (Elsevier, 2023-07-24) Jensen, Garrett L.; Pourfarrokh, Niloufar; Volz, Marcus; Morales, Linden L.; Walker, Kimberly; Hammonds, Kendall P.; El-Ghamry, Moataz; Wong, Lucas; Hodjat, Parsa; Castro, Eduardo; Rao, Arundhati; Jhavar, Sameer G.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Background and purpose: With the growing interest in total neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) there is an urgent unmet need to identify predictive markers of response to long-course neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). O6-Methylguanine (O6-MG)-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene methylation has been associated in some malignancies with response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We attempted to find if pathologic response to LCRT was associated with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (MGMTh). Materials and methods: Patients were identified with LARC, available pre-treatment biopsy specimens, and at least 1 year of follow-up who received LCRT followed by surgical resection within 6 months. Biopsies were tested for MGMTh using a Qiagen pyrosequencing kit (Catalog number 970061). The primary outcome of LCRT responsiveness was based on tumor regression grade (TRG), with grades of 0-1 considered to have excellent response and grades of 2-3 considered to be non-responders. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Results: Of 96 patients who met inclusion criteria, 76 had samples which produced reliable assay results. MGMTh corresponded with higher grade and age of the biopsy specimen. The percentage of responders to LCRT was higher amongst the MGMTh patients than the MGMTn patients (60.0% vs 27.5%, p value = 0.0061). MGMTh was not significantly associated with improved OS (2-year OS of 96.0% vs 98.0%, p = 0.8102) but there was a trend for improved RFS (2-year RFS of 87.6% vs 74.2%, p = 0.0903). Conclusion: Significantly greater tumor regression following LCRT was seen in MGMTh LARC. Methylation status may help identify good candidates for close observation without surgery following LCRT.