Browsing by Author "Wagemann, Olivia"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Downstream Biomarker Effects of Gantenerumab or Solanezumab in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease: The DIAN-TU-001 Randomized Clinical Trial
    (American Medical Association, 2024) Wagemann, Olivia; Liu, Haiyan; Wang, Guoqiao; Shi, Xinyu; Bittner, Tobias; Scelsi, Marzia A.; Farlow, Martin R.; Clifford, David B.; Supnet-Bell, Charlene; Santacruz, Anna M.; Aschenbrenner, Andrew J.; Hassenstab, Jason J.; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Gordon, Brian A.; Coalier, Kelley A.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Ibanez, Laura; Perrin, Richard J.; Xiong, Chengjie; Li, Yan; Morris, John C.; Lah, James J.; Berman, Sarah B.; Roberson, Erik D.; van Dyck, Christopher H.; Galasko, Douglas; Gauthier, Serge; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.; Brooks, William S.; Pariente, Jérémie; Mummery, Catherine J.; Day, Gregory S.; Ringman, John M.; Mendez, Patricio Chrem; St. George-Hyslop, Peter; Fox, Nick C.; Suzuki, Kazushi; Okhravi, Hamid R.; Chhatwal, Jasmeer; Levin, Johannes; Jucker, Mathias; Sims, John R.; Holdridge, Karen C.; Proctor, Nicholas K.; Yaari, Roy; Andersen, Scott W.; Mancini, Michele; Llibre-Guerra, Jorge; Bateman, Randall J.; McDade, Eric; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network–Trials Unit; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Importance: Effects of antiamyloid agents, targeting either fibrillar or soluble monomeric amyloid peptides, on downstream biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma are largely unknown in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD). Objective: To investigate longitudinal biomarker changes of synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in individuals with DIAD who are receiving antiamyloid treatment. Design, setting, and participants: From 2012 to 2019, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trial Unit (DIAN-TU-001) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, investigated gantenerumab and solanezumab in DIAD. Carriers of gene variants were assigned 3:1 to either drug or placebo. The present analysis was conducted from April to June 2023. DIAN-TU-001 spans 25 study sites in 7 countries. Biofluids and neuroimaging from carriers of DIAD gene variants in the gantenerumab, solanezumab, and placebo groups were analyzed. Interventions: In 2016, initial dosing of gantenerumab, 225 mg (subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was increased every 8 weeks up to 1200 mg. In 2017, initial dosing of solanezumab, 400 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks) was increased up to 1600 mg every 4 weeks. Main outcomes and measures: Longitudinal changes in CSF levels of neurogranin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), chitinase 3-like 1 protein (YKL-40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (NfL), and plasma levels of GFAP and NfL. Results: Of 236 eligible participants screened, 43 were excluded. A total of 142 participants (mean [SD] age, 44 [10] years; 72 female [51%]) were included in the study (gantenerumab, 52 [37%]; solanezumab, 50 [35%]; placebo, 40 [28%]). Relative to placebo, gantenerumab significantly reduced CSF neurogranin level at year 4 (mean [SD] β = -242.43 [48.04] pg/mL; P < .001); reduced plasma GFAP level at year 1 (mean [SD] β = -0.02 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .02), year 2 (mean [SD] β = -0.03 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .002), and year 4 (mean [SD] β = -0.06 [0.02] ng/mL; P < .001); and increased CSF sTREM2 level at year 2 (mean [SD] β = 1.12 [0.43] ng/mL; P = .01) and year 4 (mean [SD] β = 1.06 [0.52] ng/mL; P = .04). Solanezumab significantly increased CSF NfL (log) at year 4 (mean [SD] β = 0.14 [0.06]; P = .02). Correlation analysis for rates of change found stronger correlations between CSF markers and fluid markers with Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography for solanezumab and placebo. Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial supports the importance of fibrillar amyloid reduction in multiple AD-related processes of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in CSF and plasma in DIAD. Additional studies of antiaggregated amyloid therapies in sporadic AD and DIAD are needed to determine the utility of nonamyloid biomarkers in determining disease modification.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Investigation of sex differences in mutation carriers of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
    (Wiley, 2024) Wagemann, Olivia; Li, Yan; Hassenstab, Jason; Aschenbrenner, Andrew J.; McKay, Nicole S.; Gordon, Brian A.; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Xiong, Chengjie; Cruchaga, Carlos; Renton, Alan E.; Perrin, Richard J.; Berman, Sarah B.; Chhatwal, Jasmeer P.; Farlow, Martin R.; Day, Gregory S.; Ikeuchi, Takeshi; Jucker, Mathias; Lopera, Francisco; Mori, Hiroshi; Noble, James M.; Sánchez-Valle, Raquel; Schofield, Peter R.; Morris, John C.; Daniels, Alisha; Levin, Johannes; Bateman, Randall J.; McDade, Eric; Llibre-Guerra, Jorge J.; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Studies suggest distinct differences in the development, presentation, progression, and response to treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) between females and males. We investigated sex differences in cognition, neuroimaging, and fluid biomarkers in dominantly inherited AD (DIAD). Methods: Three hundred twenty-five mutation carriers (55% female) and one hundred eighty-six non-carriers (58% female) of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study were analyzed. Linear mixed models and Spearman's correlation explored cross-sectional sex differences in cognition, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (11 C-PiB PET) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Female carriers performed better than males on delayed recall and processing speed despite similar hippocampal volumes. As the disease progressed, symptomatic females revealed higher increases in MRI markers of neurodegeneration and memory impairment. PiB PET and established CSF AD markers revealed no sex differences. Discussion: Our findings suggest an initial cognitive reserve in female carriers followed by a pronounced increase in neurodegeneration coupled with worse performance on delayed recall at later stages of DIAD.