Browsing by Author "Wachsman, Ashley M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Design and Rationale for the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers to Predict Diabetes After Acute Pancreatitis in the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms Study: From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Tirkes, Temel; Chinchilli, Vernon M.; Bagci, Ulas; Parker, Jason G.; Zhao, Xuandong; Dasyam, Anil K.; Feranec, Nicholas; Grajo, Joseph R.; Shah, Zarine K.; Poullos, Peter D.; Spilseth, Benjamin; Zaheer, Atif; Xie, Karen L.; Wachsman, Ashley M.; Campbell-Thompson, Martha; Conwell, Darwin L.; Fogel, Evan L.; Forsmark, Christopher E.; Hart, Phil A.; Pandol, Stephen J.; Park, Walter G.; Pratley, Richard E.; Yazici, Cemal; Laughlin, Maren R.; Andersen, Dana K.; Serrano, Jose; Bellin, Melena D.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium (T1DAPC); Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    This core component of the Diabetes RElated to Acute pancreatitis and its Mechanisms (DREAM) study will examine the hypothesis that advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques can reflect underlying pathophysiologic changes and provide imaging biomarkers that predict diabetes mellitus (DM) following acute pancreatitis (AP). A subset of participants in the DREAM study will enroll and undergo serial MRI examinations using a specific research protocol. We aim to differentiate at-risk individuals from those who remain euglycemic by identifying parenchymal features following AP. Performing longitudinal MRI will enable us to observe and understand the natural history of post-AP DM. We will compare MRI parameters obtained by interrogating tissue properties in euglycemic, prediabetic and incident diabetes subjects and correlate them with metabolic, genetic, and immunological phenotypes. Differentiating imaging parameters will be combined to develop a quantitative composite risk score. This composite risk score will potentially have the ability to monitor the risk of DM in clinical practice or trials. We will use artificial intelligence, specifically deep learning, algorithms to optimize the predictive ability of MRI. In addition to the research MRI, the DREAM study will also correlate clinical computerized tomography and MRI scans with DM development.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study
    (SpringerLink, 2020-05) Tirkes, Temel; Shah, Zarine K.; Takahashi, Naoki; Grajo, Joseph R.; Chang, Stephanie T.; Wachsman, Ashley M.; Mawad, Kareem; Farinas, Carlos A.; Li, Liang; Appana, Savitri N.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Dasyam, Anil K.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Determine inter-observer variability among radiologists in assigning Cambridge Classification (CC) of chronic pancreatitis (CP) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Methods: Among 422 eligible subjects enrolled into the PROCEED study between 6/2017 and 8/2018, 39 were selected randomly for this study (chronic abdominal pain (n = 8; CC of 0), suspected CP (n = 22; CC of 0, 1 or 2) or definite CP (n = 9; CC of 3 or 4). Each imaging was scored by the local radiologist (LRs) and three of five central radiologists (CRs) at other consortium sites. The CRs were blinded to clinical data and site information of the participants. We compared the CC score assigned by the LR with the consensus CC score assigned by the CRs. The weighted kappa statistic (K) was used to estimate the inter-observer agreement. Results: For the majority of subjects (34/39), the group assignment by LR agreed with the consensus composite CT/MRCP score by the CRs (concordance ranging from 75 to 89% depending on cohort group). There was moderate agreement (63% and 67% agreed, respectively) between CRs and LRs in both the CT score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.34, 0.78]; p-value = 0.57) and the MR score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.49, 0.86]; p-value = 0.72). The composite CT/MR score showed moderate agreement (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.43, 0.81]; p-value = 0.80). Conclusion: There is a high degree of concordance among radiologists for assignment of CC using MRI and CT.