Browsing by Author "Velez, Juan Carlos Q."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cirrhosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the HRS-HARMONY Consortium
    (Elsevier, 2024) St. Hillien, Shelsea A.; Robinson, Jevon E.; Ouyang, Tianqi; Patidar, Kavish R.; Belcher, Justin M.; Cullaro, Giuseppe; Regner, Kevin R.; Chung, Raymond T.; Ufere, Nneka; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Neyra, Javier A.; Asrani, Sumeet K.; Wadei, Hani; Teixeira, J. Pedro; Saly, Danielle L.; Levitsky, Josh; Orman, Eric; Sawinski, Deirdre; Dageforde, Leigh Anne; Allegrietti, Andrew S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequency is increasing in patients with cirrhosis and these individuals often experience acute kidney injury (AKI). Direct comparisons of outcomes between AKI-only versus AKI on CKD (AoCKD) among patients with cirrhosis are not well described. Methods A total of 2057 patients with cirrhosis and AKI across 11 hospital networks from the HRS-HARMONY consortium were analyzed (70% AKI-only and 30% AoCKD). The primary outcome was unadjusted and adjusted 90-day mortality, with transplant as a competing risk, using Fine and Gray analysis. Results Compared with patients with AKI-only, patients with AoCKD had higher median admission creatinine (2.25 [interquartile range, 1.7–3.2] vs 1.83 [1.38–2.58] mg/dL) and peak creatinine (2.79 [2.12–4] vs 2.42 [1.85–3.50] mg/dL) but better liver function parameters (total bilirubin 1.5 [interquartile range, 0.7–3.1] vs 3.4 [1.5–9.3] mg/dL; and international normalized ratio 1.4 [interquartile range, 1.2–1.8] vs 1.7 [1.39–2.2]; P < .001 for all). Patients with AoCKD were more likely to have metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease cirrhosis (31% vs 17%) and less likely to have alcohol-associated liver disease (26% vs 45%; P < .001 for both). Patients with AKI-only had higher unadjusted mortality (39% vs 30%), rate of intensive care unit admission (52% vs 35%; P < .001 for both), and use of renal-replacement therapy (20% vs 15%; P = .005). After adjusting for age, race, sex, transplant listing status, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease–Sodium score, AoCKD was associated with a lower 90-day mortality compared with AKI-only (subhazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61–0.87). Conclusions In hospitalized patients with AKI and cirrhosis, AoCKD was associated with lower 90-day mortality compared with AKI-only. This may be caused by the impact of worse liver function parameters in the AKI-only group on short-term outcomes. Further study of the complicated interplay between acute and chronic kidney disease in cirrhosis is needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    AKI Treated with Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2021) Gupta, Shruti; Coca, Steven G.; Chan, Lili; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Hayek, Salim S.; Sutherland, Anne; Puri, Sonika; Srivastava, Anand; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Flythe, Jennifer E.; Rashidi, Arash; Schenck, Edward J.; Goyal, Nitender; Hedayati, S. Susan; Dy, Rajany; Bansal, Anip; Athavale, Ambarish; Nguyen, H. Bryant; Vijayan, Anitha; Charytan, David M.; Schulze, Carl E.; Joo, Min J.; Friedman, Allon N.; Zhang, Jingjing; Sosa, Marie Anne; Judd, Eric; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Mallappallil, Mary; Redfern, Roberta E.; Bansal, Amar D.; Neyra, Javier A.; Liu, Kathleen D.; Renaghan, Amanda D.; Christov, Marta; Molnar, Miklos Z.; Sharma, Shreyak; Kamal, Omer; Boateng, Jeffery Owusu; Short, Samuel A.P.; Admon, Andrew J.; Sise, Meghan E.; Wang, Wei; Parikh, Chirag R.; Leaf, David E.; STOP-COVID Investigators; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: AKI is a common sequela of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, few studies have focused on AKI treated with RRT (AKI-RRT). Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study of 3099 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 67 hospitals across the United States. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient-and hospital-level risk factors for AKI-RRT and to examine risk factors for 28-day mortality among such patients. Results: A total of 637 of 3099 patients (20.6%) developed AKI-RRT within 14 days of ICU admission, 350 of whom (54.9%) died within 28 days of ICU admission. Patient-level risk factors for AKI-RRT included CKD, men, non-White race, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, higher body mass index, higher d-dimer, and greater severity of hypoxemia on ICU admission. Predictors of 28-day mortality in patients with AKI-RRT were older age, severe oliguria, and admission to a hospital with fewer ICU beds or one with greater regional density of COVID-19. At the end of a median follow-up of 17 days (range, 1-123 days), 403 of the 637 patients (63.3%) with AKI-RRT had died, 216 (33.9%) were discharged, and 18 (2.8%) remained hospitalized. Of the 216 patients discharged, 73 (33.8%) remained RRT dependent at discharge, and 39 (18.1%) remained RRT dependent 60 days after ICU admission. Conclusions: AKI-RRT is common among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with a hospital mortality rate of >60%. Among those who survive to discharge, one in three still depends on RRT at discharge, and one in six remains RRT dependent 60 days after ICU admission.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association Between Early Treatment With Tocilizumab and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
    (American Medical Association, 2020-10-20) Gupta, Shruti; Wang, Wei; Hayek, Salim S.; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Finkel, Diana; Green, Adam; Mallappallil, Mary; Faugno, Anthony J.; Zhang, Jingjing; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Charytan, David M.; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Redfern, Roberta E.; Short, Samuel A. P.; Correa, Simon; Pokharel, Kapil K.; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Douin, David J.; Semler, Matthew W.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Leaf, David E.; STOP-COVID Investigators; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: Therapies that improve survival in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 6 receptor, may counteract the inflammatory cytokine release syndrome in patients with severe COVID-19 illness. Objective: To test whether tocilizumab decreases mortality in this population. Design, Setting, and Participants: The data for this study were derived from a multicenter cohort study of 4485 adults with COVID-19 admitted to participating intensive care units (ICUs) at 68 hospitals across the US from March 4 to May 10, 2020. Critically ill adults with COVID-19 were categorized according to whether they received or did not receive tocilizumab in the first 2 days of admission to the ICU. Data were collected retrospectively until June 12, 2020. A Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Exposures: Treatment with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death, compared via hazard ratios (HRs), and 30-day mortality, compared via risk differences. Results: Among the 3924 patients included in the analysis (2464 male [62.8%]; median age, 62 [interquartile range {IQR}, 52-71] years), 433 (11.0%) received tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. Patients treated with tocilizumab were younger (median age, 58 [IQR, 48-65] vs 63 [IQR, 52-72] years) and had a higher prevalence of hypoxemia on ICU admission (205 of 433 [47.3%] vs 1322 of 3491 [37.9%] with mechanical ventilation and a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen of <200 mm Hg) than patients not treated with tocilizumab. After applying inverse probability weighting, baseline and severity-of-illness characteristics were well balanced between groups. A total of 1544 patients (39.3%) died, including 125 (28.9%) treated with tocilizumab and 1419 (40.6%) not treated with tocilizumab. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 (IQR, 14-37) days, patients treated with tocilizumab had a lower risk of death compared with those not treated with tocilizumab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92). The estimated 30-day mortality was 27.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-33.8%) in the tocilizumab-treated patients and 37.1% (95% CI, 35.5%-38.7%) in the non-tocilizumab–treated patients (risk difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 3.1%-16.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 in this cohort study, the risk of in-hospital mortality in this study was lower in patients treated with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission compared with patients whose treatment did not include early use of tocilizumab. However, the findings may be susceptible to unmeasured confounding, and further research from randomized clinical trials is needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US
    (American Medical Association, 2020-07-15) Gupta, Shruti; Hayek, Salim S.; Wang, Wei; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Sutherland, Anne; Green, Adam; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Goyal, Nitender; Vijayan, Anitha; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Arunthamakun, Justin; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Short, Samuel A. P.; Kibbelaar, Zoe A.; Omar, Samah Abu; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Semler, Matthew W.; Leaf, David E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19. Objectives: To assess factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed 2215 adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 65 hospitals across the US from March 4 to April 4, 2020. Exposures: Patient-level data, including demographics, comorbidities, and organ dysfunction, and hospital characteristics, including number of ICU beds. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes. Results: A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [14.5] years; 1436 [64.8%] male; 1738 [78.5%] with at least 1 chronic comorbidity) were included in the study. At 28 days after ICU admission, 784 patients (35.4%) had died, 824 (37.2%) were discharged, and 607 (27.4%) remained hospitalized. At the end of study follow-up (median, 16 days; interquartile range, 8-28 days), 875 patients (39.5%) had died, 1203 (54.3%) were discharged, and 137 (6.2%) remained hospitalized. Factors independently associated with death included older age (≥80 vs <40 years of age: odds ratio [OR], 11.15; 95% CI, 6.19-20.06), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), higher body mass index (≥40 vs <25: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.25), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02), active cancer (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.35-3.43), and the presence of hypoxemia (Pao2:Fio2<100 vs ≥300 mm Hg: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.11-4.08), liver dysfunction (liver Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2 vs 0: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.30–5.25), and kidney dysfunction (renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 4 vs 0: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46–4.05) at ICU admission. Patients admitted to hospitals with fewer ICU beds had a higher risk of death (<50 vs ≥100 ICU beds: OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.16-4.99). Hospitals varied considerably in the risk-adjusted proportion of patients who died (range, 6.6%-80.8%) and in the percentage of patients who received hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and other treatments and supportive therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-level risk factors that may be associated with death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and can facilitate the identification of medications and supportive therapies to improve outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US
    (American Medical Association, 2020-11) Gupta, Shruti; Hayek, Salim S.; Wang, Wei; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Sutherland, Anne; Green, Adam; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Goyal, Nitender; Vijayan, Anitha; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Arunthamakun, Justin; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Short, Samuel A.P.; Kibbelaar, Zoe A.; Omar, Samah Abu; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Semler, Matthew W.; Leaf, David E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19. Objectives: To assess factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed 2215 adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 65 hospitals across the US from March 4 to April 4, 2020. Exposures: Patient-level data, including demographics, comorbidities, and organ dysfunction, and hospital characteristics, including number of ICU beds. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes. Results: A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [14.5] years; 1436 [64.8%] male; 1738 [78.5%] with at least 1 chronic comorbidity) were included in the study. At 28 days after ICU admission, 784 patients (35.4%) had died, 824 (37.2%) were discharged, and 607 (27.4%) remained hospitalized. At the end of study follow-up (median, 16 days; interquartile range, 8-28 days), 875 patients (39.5%) had died, 1203 (54.3%) were discharged, and 137 (6.2%) remained hospitalized. Factors independently associated with death included older age (≥80 vs <40 years of age: odds ratio [OR], 11.15; 95% CI, 6.19-20.06), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), higher body mass index (≥40 vs <25: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.25), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02), active cancer (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.35-3.43), and the presence of hypoxemia (Pao2:Fio2<100 vs ≥300 mm Hg: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.11-4.08), liver dysfunction (liver Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2-4 vs 0: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.30-5.25), and kidney dysfunction (renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 4 vs 0: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46-4.05) at ICU admission. Patients admitted to hospitals with fewer ICU beds had a higher risk of death (<50 vs ≥100 ICU beds: OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.16-4.99). Hospitals varied considerably in the risk-adjusted proportion of patients who died (range, 6.6%-80.8%) and in the percentage of patients who received hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and other treatments and supportive therapies. Conclusions and relevance: This study identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-level risk factors that may be associated with death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and can facilitate the identification of medications and supportive therapies to improve outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury including hepatorenal syndrome in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis in the US
    (Elsevier, 2023) Patidar, Kavish R.; Belcher, Justin M.; Regner, Kevin R.; St. Hillien, Shelsea A.; Simonetto, Douglas A.; Asrani, Sumeet K.; Neyra, Javier A.; Sharma, Pratima; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Wadei, Hani; Nadim, Mitra K.; Chung, Raymond T.; Seethapathy, Ritu; Parada, Xavier Vela; Ouyang, Tianqi; Ufere, Nneka N.; Robinson, Jevon E.; McLean Diaz, Paige; Wilechansky, Robert M.; Przybyszewski, Eric M.; Smith, Thomas N.; Ali, Arzina Aziz; Orman, Eric S.; Schulz, Philipp; Siddiqui, Salaah M.; Shabbir, Rehma; Liu, Lucas J.; Cama-Olivares, Augusto; Flannery, Alexander H.; Baker, Megan L.; Gunasekaran, Deepthi; Aswine, Adeline; Issa, Rafik; Li, Jay; Verma, Shreya; Chalmers, Dustin; Varghese, Vipin; Lam, Walter; Mohamed, Muner; Kovacic, Rosemary; Gaddy, Anna; Attieh, Rose Mary; Cortes, Pedro; Semnani, Sahar; Wang, Lin; Khemichian, Saro; Allegretti, Andrew S.; HRS-HARMONY consortium; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis is common and associated with high morbidity, but the incidence rates of different etiologies of AKI are not well described in the US. We compared incidence rates, practice patterns, and outcomes across etiologies of AKI in cirrhosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 11 hospital networks, including consecutive adult patients admitted with AKI and cirrhosis in 2019. The etiology of AKI was adjudicated based on pre-specified clinical definitions (prerenal/hypovolemic AKI, hepatorenal syndrome [HRS-AKI], acute tubular necrosis [ATN], other). Results: A total of 2,063 patients were included (median age 62 [IQR 54-69] years, 38.3% female, median MELD-Na score 26 [19-31]). The most common etiology was prerenal AKI (44.3%), followed by ATN (30.4%) and HRS-AKI (12.1%); 6.0% had other AKI, and 7.2% could not be classified. In our cohort, 8.1% of patients received a liver transplant and 36.5% died by 90 days. The lowest rate of death was observed in patients with prerenal AKI (22.2%; p <0.001), while death rates were higher but not significantly different from each other in those with HRS-AKI and ATN (49.0% vs. 52.7%; p = 0.42). Using prerenal AKI as a reference, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) for 90-day mortality was higher for HRS-AKI (sHR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18-3.54; p <0.001) and ATN (sHR 2.83; 95% CI 2.36-3.41; p <0.001). In adjusted analysis, higher AKI stage and lack of complete response to treatment were associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality (p <0.001 for all). Conclusion: AKI is a severe complication of cirrhosis. HRS-AKI is uncommon and is associated with similar outcomes to ATN. The etiology of AKI, AKI stage/severity, and non-response to treatment were associated with mortality. Further optimization of vasoconstrictors for HRS-AKI and supportive therapies for ATN are needed. Impact and implications: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis carries high morbidity, and management is determined by the etiology of injury. However, a large and well-adjudicated multicenter database from US centers that uses updated AKI definitions is lacking. Our findings demonstrate that acute tubular necrosis and hepatorenal syndrome have similar outcomes (∼50% mortality at 90 days), though hepatorenal syndrome is uncommon (12% of all AKI cases). These findings represent practice patterns at US transplant/tertiary centers and can be used as a baseline, presenting the situation prior to the adoption of terlipressin in the US.