Browsing by Author "Trpkov, Kiril"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Diagnostic Criteria for Oncocytic Renal Neoplasms: A Survey of Urologic Pathologists
    (Elsevier, 2017-05) Williamson, Sean R.; Gadde, Ramya; Trpkov, Kiril; Hirsch, Michelle S.; Srigley, John R.; Reuter, Victor E.; Cheng, Liang; Kunju, L. Priya; Barod, Ravi; Rogers, Craig G.; Delahunt, Brett; Hes, Ondrej; Eble, John N.; Zhou, Ming; McKenney, Jesse K.; Martignoni, Guido; Fleming, Stewart; Grignon, David J.; Moch, Holger; Gupta, Nilesh S.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma have been long recognized as distinct tumors; however, it remains unknown if uniform diagnostic criteria are used to distinguish these tumor types in practice. A survey was distributed to urologic pathologists regarding oncocytic tumors. Responses were received from 17 of 26 invitees. Histologically, more than 1 mitotic figure was regarded as most worrisome (n = 10) or incompatible (n = 6) with oncocytoma diagnosis. Interpretation of focal nuclear wrinkling, focal perinuclear clearing, and multinucleation depended on extent and did not necessarily exclude oncocytoma if minor. Staining techniques most commonly used included the following: cytokeratin 7 (94%), KIT (71%), vimentin (65%), colloidal iron (59%), CD10 (53%), and AMACR (41%). Rare cytokeratin 7–positive cells (≤5%) were regarded as most supportive of oncocytoma, although an extent excluding oncocytoma was not universal. Multiple chromosomal losses were most strongly supportive for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma diagnosis (65%). Less certainty was reported for chromosomal gain or a single loss. For tumors with mixed or inconclusive features, many participants use an intermediate diagnostic category (82%) that does not label the tumor as unequivocally benign or malignant, typically “oncocytic neoplasm” or “tumor” with comment. The term “hybrid tumor” was used variably in several scenarios. A slight majority (65%) report outright diagnosis of oncocytoma in needle biopsies. The morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic characteristics that define oncocytic renal tumors remain incompletely understood. Further studies correlating genetics, behavior, and histology are needed to define which tumors truly warrant classification as carcinomas for patient counseling and follow-up strategies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of an institutional series of low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of the kidney and review of the mutational landscape of LOT
    (Springer, 2023) Ricci, Costantino; Ambrosi, Francesca; Franceschini, Tania; Giunchi, Francesca; Grillini, Alessia; Franchini, Eugenia; Grillini, Marco; Schiavina, Riccardo; Massari, Francesco; Mollica, Veronica; Tateo, Valentina; Bianchi, Federico Mineo; Bianchi, Lorenzo; Droghetti, Matteo; Maloberti, Thais; Tallini, Giovanni; Colecchia, Maurizio; Acosta, Andres Martin; Lobo, João; Trpkov, Kiril; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; de Biase, Dario; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The 2022 WHO classification of urinary and male genital tumors introduced several novel kidney entities exhibiting eosinophilic/oncocytic features with specific mutational backgrounds. Thus, molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), became more commonly used for their evaluation. We studied 12 low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOT) of the kidney (from 11 patients), identified in a cohort of 210 eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors, diagnosed in our institution between October 2019 and May 2023, which represented 5.7% (12/210) of all eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors during this period. We reviewed their clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features, as well as their mutational profiles. We also reviewed the literature on NGS-derived data of LOT, by selecting papers in which LOT diagnosis was rendered according to the criteria proposed initially. Median age was 65 years (mean: 63.5; range 43–79) and median tumor size was 2.0 cm (mean: 2.2; range: 0.9–3.1). All tumors were positive for PAX8, CK7, and GATA3, and negative or focally positive for CD117/KIT. We found the following gene mutations: MTOR ((6/11), 54.5%)), TSC1 ((2/11), 18.2%)), and 1 had both NOTCH1 and NOTCH4 ((1/11), 9.1%)). Wild-type status was found in 2/11 (18.2%) patients and one tumor was not analyzable. A review of 8 previous studies that included 79 LOTs revealed frequent mutations in the genes that regulate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: MTOR (32/79 (40.5%)), TSC1 (21/79 (26.6%)), and TSC2 (9/79 (11.4%)). Other mutated genes included PIK3CA, NF2, and PTEN, not typically known to affect the mTOR pathway, but potentially acting as upstream and downstream effectors. Our study shows that LOT is increasingly diagnosed in routine practice when applying the appropriate diagnostic criteria. We also confirm that the mTOR pathway is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of this tumor mainly through MTOR, TCS1, and TSC2 mutations, but other genes could also be involved in the pathway activation, especially in LOTs without “canonical” mutations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gene Fusion Characterization of Rare Aggressive Prostate Cancer Variants ‐ Adenosquamous Carcinoma, Pleomorphic Giant Cell Carcinoma, and Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: An Analysis of 19 Cases
    (Wiley, 2020) Alhamar, Mohamed; Vladislav, I. Tudor; Smith, Steven C.; Gao, Yuan; Cheng, Liang; Favazza, Laura A.; Alani, Ali M.; Ittmann, Michael M.; Riddle, Nicole D.; Whitely, Lisa J.; Gupta, Nilesh S.; Carskadon, Shannon; Gomez-Gelvez, Juan C.; Chitale, Dhananjay A.; Palanisamy, Nallasivam; Hes, Ondrej; Trpkov, Kiril; Williamson, Sean R.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aims We evaluated the molecular underpinnings of rare aggressive prostate cancer variants adenosquamous, pleomorphic giant cell, and sarcomatoid carcinomas. Methods and Results We retrieved 19 tumors with one or more variant(s) and performed ERG immunohistochemistry, a next‐generation sequencing assay targeting recurrent gene fusions, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for ERG and BRAF. Divergent differentiation included: sarcomatoid (n=10), adenosquamous (n=7), and pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma (n=7). Five patients had more than one variant. Four had variants only in metastases. ERG rearrangement was detected in 9 (47%, 7 via sequencing, showing TMPRSS2‐ERG and one GRHL2‐ERG fusion, and 2 via FISH, showing rearrangement via deletion). Of these, ERG immunohistochemistry was positive in the adenocarcinoma for 8/9 (89%) but only 5/9 (56%, typically decreased) in the variant. One patient had false‐positive ERG immunohistochemistry in the sarcomatoid component despite negative FISH. Two (11%) harbored BRAF fusions (FAM131A‐BRAF and SND1‐BRAF). Conclusions ERG gene fusions are present in these rare prostate cancer variants with a close frequency to conventional prostate cancer (9/19, 47%). ERG immunohistochemistry usually detects rearrangement in the adenocarcinoma but is less sensitive for the variant histology with weak to negative staining. Adenosquamous and sarcomatoid variants particularly can occur together. Molecular assessment may be an additional tool in select cases to confirm prostatic origin of unusual tumors. The presence of 2 BRAF gene rearrangements suggests that this gene fusion may be enriched in this setting, as RAF kinase fusions have been previously reported in 1‐2% of prostate cancers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Handling and reporting of orchidectomy specimens with testicular cancer: areas of consensus and variation among 25 experts and 225 European pathologists
    (Wiley, 2015-09) Berney, Daniel M.; Algaba, Ferran; Amin, Mahul; Delahunt, Brett; Compérat, Eva; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Humphrey, Peter; Idrees, Mohammed; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; Mikuz, Gregor; Montironi, Rodolfo; Oliva, Esther; Srigley, John; Reuter, Victor E.; Trpkov, Kiril; Ulbright, Thomas M.; Varma, Murali; Verrill, Clare; Young, Robert H.; Zhou, Ming; Egevad, Lars; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    The handling and reporting of testicular tumours is difficult due to their rarity. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey developed by the European Network of Uro-Pathology (ENUP) and sent to its members and experts to assess the evaluation of testicular germ cell tumours. Twenty-five experts and 225 ENUP members replied. Areas of disagreement included immaturity in teratomas, reported by 32% of experts but 68% of ENUP. Although the presence of rete testis invasion was reported widely, the distinction between pagetoid and stromal invasion was made by 96% of experts but only 63% of ENUP. Immunohistochemistry was used in more than 50% of cases by 68% of ENUP and 12% of experts. Staging revealed the greatest areas of disagreement. Invasion of the tunica vaginalis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1 by 52% of experts and 67% of ENUP, but T2 by the remainder. Tumour invading the hilar adipose tissue adjacent to the epididymis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1: 40% of experts, 43% of ENUP; T2: 36% of experts, 30% of ENUP; and T3: 24% of experts, 27% of ENUP. CONCLUSIONS: There is remarkable consensus in many areas of testicular pathology. Significant areas of disagreement included staging and reporting of histological types, both of which have the potential to impact on therapy
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Low-grade Oncocytic Tumor of Kidney (CD117 Negative, Cytokeratin 7 Positive): A Distinct Entity?
    (Wiley, 2019) Trpkov, Kiril; Williamson, Sean R.; Gao, Yuan; Martinek, Petr; Cheng, Liang; Sangoi, Ankur R.; Yilmaz, Asli; Wang, Cheng; Fraile, Pilar San Miguel; Montiel, Delia M. Perez; Bulimbasić, Stela; Rogala, Joanna; Hes, Ondrej; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aim To describe a group of distinct low‐grade oncocytic renal tumors that demonstrate CD117 negative/Cytokeratin (CK) 7 positive immunoprofile. Methods and results We identified 28 such tumors from 4 large renal tumor archives. We performed immunohistochemistry for: CK7, CD117, PAX8, CD10, AMACR, e‐cadherin, CK20, CA9, AE1/AE3, vimentin, BerEP4, MOC31, CK5/6, p63, HMB45, melan A, CD15 and FH. In 14 cases we performed array CGH; in 9 cases with successful result. Median patient age was 66 years (range 49‐78 years) with a male‐to‐female ratio of 1:1.8. Median tumor size was 3 cm (range 1.1‐13.5 cm). All were single tumors, solid and tan‐brown, without a syndromic association. On microscopy, all cases showed solid and compact nested growth. There were frequent areas of edematous stroma with loosely arranged cells. The tumor cells had oncocytic cytoplasm with uniformly round to oval nuclei, but without significant irregularities, and showed only focal perinuclear halos. Negative CD117 and positive CK7 reactivity were present in all cases (in 2 cases there was focal and very weak CD117 reactivity). Uniform reactivity was found for: PAX8, AE1/AE3, e‐cadherin, BerEP4 and MOC31. Negative stains included: CA9, CK20, vimentin, CK5/6, p63, HMB45, Melan A and CD15. CD10 and AMACR were either negative or focally positive; FH was retained. On array CGH, there were frequent deletions at 19p13.3 (7/9), 1p36.33 (5/9) and 19q13.11 (4/9); disomic status was found in 2/9 cases. On follow‐up (mean 31.8 months, range 1‐118), all patients were alive with no disease progression. Conclusion Low‐grade oncocytic tumors that are CD117 negative/CK7positive demonstrate consistent and readily recognizable morphology, immunoprofile, and indolent behavior.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia
    (Elsevier, 2021) Trpkov, Kiril; Hes, Ondrej; Williamson, Sean R.; Adeniran, Adebowale J.; Agaimy, Abbas; Alaghehbandan, Reza; Amin, Mahul B.; Argani, Pedram; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Cheville, John C.; Comperat, Eva; Werneck da Cunha, Isabela; Gordetsky, Jennifer B.; Gupta, Sounak; He, Huiying; Hirsch, Michelle S.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Kapur, Payal; Kojima, Fumiyoshi; Lopez, Jose I.; Maclean, Fiona; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; McKenney, Jesse K.; Mehra, Rohit; Menon, Santosh; Netto, George J.; Przybycin, Christopher G.; Rao, Priya; Rao, Qiu; Reuter, Victor E.; Saleeb, Rola M.; Shah, Rajal B.; Smith, Steven C.; Tickoo, Satish; Tretiakova, Maria S.; True, Lawrence; Verkarre, Virginie; Wobker, Sara E.; Zhou, Ming; Gill, Anthony J.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reappraisal of Morphological Differences between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-03) Ohe, Chisato; Smith, Steven C.; Sirohi, Deepika; Divatia, Mukul; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza; Paner, Gladell P.; Agaimy, Abbas; Amin, Mitual B.; Argani, Pedram; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Colecchia, Maurizio; Compérat, Eva; Werneck da Cunha, Isabela; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Gill, Anthony J.; Hes, Ondřej; Hirsch, Michelle; Jochum, Wolfram; Kunju, Lakshmi P.; Maclean, Fiona; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; McKenney, Jesse K.; Mehra, Rohit; Nesi, Gabriella; Osunkoya, Adeboye O.; Picken, Maria M.; Rao, Priya; Reuter, Victor E.; Guilherme de Oliveira Salles, Paulo; Schultz, Luciana; Tickoo, Satish K.; Tomlins, Scott A.; Trpkov, Kiril; Amin, Mahul B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Renal medullary carcinomas (RMCs) and collecting duct carcinomas (CDCs) are rare subsets of lethal high-stage, high-grade distal nephron-related adenocarcinomas with a predilection for the renal medullary region. Recent findings have established an emerging group of fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient tumors related to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC-RCCs) syndrome within this morphologic spectrum. Recently developed, reliable ancillary testing has enabled consistent separation between these tumor types. Here, we present the clinicopathologic features and differences in the morphologic patterns between RMC, CDC, and FH-deficient RCC in consequence of these recent developments. This study included a total of 100 cases classified using contemporary criteria and ancillary tests. Thirty-three RMCs (SMARCB1/INI1-deficient, hemoglobinopathy), 38 CDCs (SMARCB1/INI1-retained), and 29 RCCs defined by the FH-deficient phenotype (FH/2SC or FH/2SC with FH mutation, regardless of HLRCC syndromic stigmata/history) were selected. The spectrum of morphologic patterns was critically evaluated, and the differences between the morphologic patterns present in the 3 groups were analyzed statistically. Twenty-five percent of cases initially diagnosed as CDC were reclassified as FH-deficient RCC on the basis of our contemporary diagnostic approach. Among the different overlapping morphologic patterns, sieve-like/cribriform and reticular/yolk sac tumor-like patterns favored RMCs, whereas intracystic papillary and tubulocystic patterns favored FH-deficient RCC. The tubulopapillary pattern favored both CDCs and FH-deficient RCCs, and the multinodular infiltrating papillary pattern favored CDCs. Infiltrating glandular and solid sheets/cords/nested patterns were not statistically different among the 3 groups. Viral inclusion-like macronucleoli, considered as a hallmark of HLRCC-RCCs, were observed significantly more frequently in FH-deficient RCCs. Despite the overlapping morphology found among these clinically aggressive infiltrating high-grade adenocarcinomas of the kidney, reproducible differences in morphology emerged between these categories after rigorous characterization. Finally, we recommend that definitive diagnosis of CDC should only be made if RMC and FH-deficient RCC are excluded.