Browsing by Author "Trout, Andrew T."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consensus Minimum MRI Protocol for the Child With Acute Recurrent or Chronic Pancreatitis
    (American Roentgen Ray Society, 2024) Trout, Andrew T.; Squires, Judy H.; Rees, Mitchell A.; Plunk, Matthew R.; Murati, Michael A.; Marine, Meghan B.; Browne, Lorna P.; Anupindi, Sudha A.; Abu-El-Haija, Maisam; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of children with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). Consensus is lacking for a minimum MRI protocol for the child with known or suspected ARP or CP. Lack of standardization contributes to variable diagnostic performance and hampers application of uniform interpretive criteria for clinical diagnosis and multicenter research studies. We convened a working group to achieve consensus for a minimum MRI protocol for children with suspected ARP or CP. The group included eight pediatric radiologists experienced in interpreting MRI for pediatric pancreatitis and one medical pancreatologist and functioned from November 2022 to March 2023. Existing clinical protocols were summarized across sites represented by group members, and commonly used sequences guided the group’s discussion. The final consensus minimum MRI protocol includes five noncontrast sequences and two postcontrast sequences (which are required only in select clinical scenarios). The working group also provides recommended acquisition parameters, sequence-specific technical suggestions, and general recommendations for optimal imaging technique. We recommend that all sites imaging children with ARP and CP for clinical care, and particularly those engaged in cooperative group trials for pancreatitis, ensure that their local protocol includes these minimum sequences.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Interobserver Agreement for CT and MRI Findings of Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: A Multicenter Ancillary Study Under the INSPPIRE Consortium
    (American Roentgen Ray Society, 2022) Trout, Andrew T.; Abu-El-Haija, Maisam; Anupindi, Sudha A.; Marine, Megan B.; Murati, Michael; Phelps, Andrew S.; Rees, Mitchell A.; Squires, Judy H.; Ellery, Kate M.; Gariepy, Cheryl E.; Maqbool, Asim; McFerron, Brian A.; Perito, Emily R.; Schwarzenberg, Sarah J.; Zhang, Bin; Andersen, Dana K.; Lowe, Mark E.; Uc, Aliye; Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC); Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Imaging findings represent key criteria for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis in children. Understanding radiologists’ agreement for imaging findings is critical to standardizing and optimizing diagnostic criteria. Objective: To evaluate the interobserver agreement among experienced pediatric radiologists for subjective, quantitative, and semi-quantitative imaging findings of chronic pancreatitis in children. Methods: In this retrospective study, CT or MRI examinations performed in children with chronic pancreatitis were submitted by six sites participating in the INSPPIRE consortium. One pediatric radiologist from each of the six sites reviewed examinations; three of the radiologists independently reviewed all CT examinations, and the other three radiologists independently reviewed all MRI examinations. Reviewers recorded 13 categorical imaging findings of chronic pancreatitis and measured pancreas thickness and duct diameter. Agreement was assessed using kappa coefficients for the categorical variables and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the continuous measures. Results: A total of 76 CT and 80 MRI examinations performed in 110 children (mean age, 11.3±4.6 years; 65 girls, 45 boys) were reviewed. For CT, kappa coefficients for categorical findings ranged from −0.01 to 0.81, with relatively high kappa coefficients for parenchymal calcification (κ=0.81), main pancreatic duct dilation (κ=0.63), and atrophy (κ=0.52). ICCs for parenchymal thickness measurements ranged from 0.57 in the pancreas head to 0.80 in the body and tail. ICC for duct diameter was 0.85. For MRI, kappa coefficients for categorical findings ranged from −0.01 to 0.74, with relatively high kappa coefficients for main duct irregularity (κ=0.74), side branch dilation (κ=0.70), number of dilated side branches (κ=0.65), and main duct dilation (κ=0.64); kappa coefficient for atrophy was 0.52. ICCs for parenchymal thickness measurements ranged from 0.59 in the pancreas head to 0.68 in the tail. ICC for duct diameter was 0.77. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement was fair to moderate for most CT and MRI findings of chronic pancreatitis in children. Clinical Impact: This study highlights challenges for the imaging diagnosis of pediatric chronic pancreatitis. Standardized and/or objective criteria are needed given the importance of imaging in diagnosis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    What Patients Want to Know about Imaging Examinations: A Multiinstitutional U.S. Survey in Adult and Pediatric Teaching Hospitals on Patient Preferences for Receiving Information before Radiologic Examinations
    (RSNA, 2018) Pahade, Jay K.; Trout, Andrew T.; Zhang, Bin; Bhambhvani, Pradeep; Muse, Victorine V.; Delaney, Lisa R.; Zucker, Evan J.; Pandharipande, Pari V.; Brink, James A.; Goske, Marilyn J.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Purpose To identify what information patients and parents or caregivers found useful before an imaging examination, from whom they preferred to receive information, and how those preferences related to patient-specific variables including demographics and prior radiologic examinations. Materials and Methods A 24-item survey was distributed at three pediatric and three adult hospitals between January and May 2015. The χ2 or Fisher exact test (categorical variables) and one-way analysis of variance or two-sample t test (continuous variables) were used for comparisons. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations between responses and demographics. Results Of 1742 surveys, 1542 (89%) were returned (381 partial, 1161 completed). Mean respondent age was 46.2 years ± 16.8 (standard deviation), with respondents more frequently female (1025 of 1506, 68%) and Caucasian (1132 of 1504, 75%). Overall, 78% (1117 of 1438) reported receiving information about their examination most commonly from the ordering provider (824 of 1292, 64%), who was also the most preferred source (1005 of 1388, 72%). Scheduled magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or nuclear medicine examinations (P < .001 vs other examination types) and increasing education (P = .008) were associated with higher rates of receiving information. Half of respondents (757 of 1452, 52%) sought information themselves. The highest importance scores for pre-examination information (Likert scale ≥4) was most frequently assigned to information on examination preparation and least frequently assigned to whether an alternative radiation-free examination could be used (74% vs 54%; P < .001). Conclusion Delivery of pre-examination information for radiologic examinations is suboptimal, with half of all patients and caregivers seeking information on their own. Ordering providers are the predominant and preferred source of examination-related information, with respondents placing highest importance on information related to examination preparation.