Browsing by Author "Tirupathi, Raghavendra"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis(BMC, 2021-10) Alhumaid, Saad; Al Mutair, Abbas; Al Alawi, Zainab; Rabaan, Ali A.; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Alomari, Mohammed A.; Alshakhes, Aqeel S.; Alshawi, Abeer M.; Ahmed, Gasmelseed Y.; Almusabeh, Hassan M.; Alghareeb, Tariq T.; Alghuwainem, Abdulaziz A.; Alsulaiman, Zainab A.; Alabdulmuhsin, Mohammed A.; AlBuwaidi, Emad A.; Dukhi, Amjad K. Bu; Mufti, Hani N.; Al-Qahtani, Manaf; Dhama, Kuldeep; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Al-Omari, Awad; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Currently there is no systematic review and meta-analysis of the global incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the general adult population. Objectives To estimate the incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions after COVID-19 vaccines and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, triggers, presenting signs and symptoms, treatment and clinical course of confirmed cases. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] statement was followed. Methods Electronic databases (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2020 to 31 May 2021 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination: anaphylaxis, non-anaphylaxis, anaphylactic reaction, nonanaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock, hypersensitivity, allergy reaction, allergic reaction, immunology reaction, immunologic reaction, angioedema, loss of consciousness, generalized erythema, urticaria, urticarial rash, cyanosis, grunting, stridor, tachypnoea, wheezing, tachycardia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and tryptase. We included studies in adults of all ages in all healthcare settings. Effect sizes of prevalence were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To minimize heterogeneity, we performed sub-group analyses. Results Of the 1,734 papers that were identified, 26 articles were included in the systematic review (8 case report, 5 cohort, 4 case series, 2 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) and 14 articles (1 cohort, 2 case series, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) were included in meta-analysis. Studies involving 26,337,421 vaccine recipients [Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 14,505,399) and Moderna (n = 11,831,488)] were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence estimate of anaphylaxis to both vaccines was 5.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 7.2, I2 = 81%, p = < 0.0001), while the overall pooled prevalence estimate of nonanaphylactic reactions to both vaccines was 53.9 (95% CI 0.0 to 116.1, I2 = 99%, p = < 0.0001). Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech resulted in higher anaphylactic reactions compared to Moderna (8.0, 95% CI 0.0 to 11.3, I2 = 85% versus 2.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 5.7, I2 = 59%). However, lower incidence of nonanaphylactic reactions was associated with Pfizer-BioNTech compared to Moderna (43.9, 95% CI 0.0 to 131.9, I2 = 99% versus 63.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 151.8, I2 = 98%). The funnel plots for possible publication bias for the pooled effect sizes to determine the incidence of anaphylaxis and nonanaphylactic reactions associated with mRNA COVID-19 immunization based on mRNA vaccine type appeared asymmetrical on visual inspection, and Egger’s tests confirmed asymmetry by producing p values < 0.05. Across the included studies, the most commonly identified risk factors for anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were female sex and personal history of atopy. The key triggers to anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions identified in these studies included foods, medications, stinging insects or jellyfish, contrast media, cosmetics and detergents, household products, and latex. Previous history of anaphylaxis; and comorbidities such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic and contact eczema/dermatitis and psoriasis and cholinergic urticaria were also found to be important. Conclusion The prevalence of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is very low; and nonanaphylactic reactions occur at higher rate, however, cutaneous reactions are largely self-limited. Both anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions should not discourage vaccination.Item Antibiotics in the pipeline: a literature review (2017–2020)(Springer, 2021-10-04) Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Momattin, Hisham; Al-Ali, Anfal Y.; Eljaaly, Khalid; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Haradwala, Mohamed Bilal; Areti, Swetha; Alhumaid, Saad; Rabaan, Ali A.; Al Mutair, Abbas; Schlagenhauf, Patricia; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat. It increases mortality and morbidity and strains healthcare systems. Health care professionals can counter the rising AMR by promoting antibiotic stewardship and facilitating new drug development. Even with the economic and scientific challenges, it is reassuring that new agents continue to be developed. Methods This review addresses new antibiotics in the pipeline. We conducted a review of the literature including Medline, Clinicaltrials.org, and relevant pharmaceutical companies for approved and in pipeline antibiotics in phase 3 or new drug application (NDA). Results We found a number of new antibiotics and reviewed their current development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, and indications for which they have been approved. The included studies from phase 3 clinical trials were mainly utilized for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia acquired in the healthcare settings. The number of these agents is limited against high priority organisms. The identified antibiotics were based mainly on previously known molecules or pre-existing antimicrobial agents. Conclusion There are a limited number of antibiotics against high priority organisms such as multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. New antimicrobial agents directed against the top priority organisms as classified by the World Health Organization are urgently needed.Item COVID-19 and mucormycosis superinfection: the perfect storm(Springer, 2021-07) Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Alhumaid, Saad; Alshukairi, Alshukairi; Temsah, Mohamad-Hani; Barry, Mazin; Al Mutair, Abbas; Rabaan, Ali A.; Al-Omari, Awadh; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; AlQahtani, Manaf; AlBahrani, Salma; Dhama, Kuldeep; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground The recent emergence of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) disease had been associated with reports of fungal infections such as aspergillosis and mucormycosis especially among critically ill patients treated with steroids. The recent surge in cases of COVID-19 in India during the second wave of the pandemic had been associated with increased reporting of invasive mucormycosis post COVID-19. There are multiple case reports and case series describing mucormycosis in COVID-19. Purpose In this review, we included most recent reported case reports and case-series of mucormycosis among patients with COVID-19 and describe the clinical features and outcome. Results Many of the mucormycosis reports were eported from India, especially in COVID-19 patients who were treated and recovered patients. The most commonly reported infection sites were rhino-orbital/rhino-cerebral mucormycosis. Those patients were diabetic and had corticosteroids therapy for controlling the severity of COVID-19, leading to a higher fatality in such cases and complicating the pandemic scenario. The triad of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), corticosteroid use and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus have been evident for significant increase in the incidence of angioinvasive maxillofacial mucormycosis. In addition, the presence of spores and other factors might play a role as well. Conclusion With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and increasing number of critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, it is important to develop a risk-based approach for patients at risk of mucormycosis based on the epidemiological burden of mucormycosis, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, COVID-19 disease severity and use of immune modulating agents including the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents in patients with cancer and transplants.Item COVID-19 disparity among racial and ethnic minorities in the US: A cross sectional analysis(Elsevier, 2020-11) Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Muradova, Valeriia; Shekhar, Raj; Salim, Sohail Abdul; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Palabindala, Venkataraman; Medicine, School of MedicineAim To analyze racial disparities in Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in the United States of America and discuss possible reasons behind this inequality. Subject and methods We obtained estimated case counts of African-American, Caucasian, Native American, Asian and Hispanic individuals with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)infection through May 5, 2020, from publicly available data on state departments of health websites. We calculated race-specific fractions as the percentage of the total population and analyzed the reasons behind this disparity. Results The incident rates of COVID-19 were higher among African Americans and among Latinos disproportionately higher than their representation in 14 states and 9 states, respectively. A similar observation was also reported for New York city. The percentage of deaths reported among African Americans was disproportionately higher than their represented share in the population in 23 out of 35 states. It was reported that 22.4% of COVID-19 deaths in the USA were African American, even though black people make up 13.4% of the USA population. Conclusions The analysis shows the disparity of coronavirus disease outcomes by ethnicity and race. Additional research is needed to determine the factors behind this inequality.Item Feathered fears: Could avian H5N1 influenza be the next pandemic threat of disease X?(Elsevier, 2024-04-22) Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Temsah, Mohamad-Hani; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Implication of the emergence of the delta (B.1.617.2) variants on vaccine effectiveness(Springer, 2022-06) Al‑Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Koritala, Thoyaja; Alhumaid, Saad; Barry, Mazin; Alshukairi, Abeer N.; Temsah, Mohamad‑Hani; Al Mutair, Abbas; Rabaan, Ali; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Gautret, Philippe; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: COVID-19 vaccines have been developed to compact the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and have been administered to people all over the world. These vaccines have been quite effective in reducing the possibility of severe illness, hospitalization and death. However, the recent emergence of Variants of Concern specifically the delta variant, B.1.617.2, had resulted in additional waves of the pandemic. Methods: We aim to review the literature to understand the transmission and disease severity, and determine the efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines. We searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase till August 4th 2021, and used the search terms "delta variant", "vaccinations"," breakthrough infections", and "neutralizing antibody". For the meta-analysis, 21 studies were screened in particular and five articles (148,071 cases) were included in the study, and only four were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Results: In this review, both in vitro and in vivo studies showed significant reductions in neutralization rates against delta variants for vaccinated individuals and convalescent patients with prior history of COVID-19. However, There was a lower incidence of infection with SARS-CoV-2 due to Delta variant was found after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech, Oxford-AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines. Conclusion: In fully vaccinated individuals, symptomatic infection with the delta variant was significantly reduced, and therefore, vaccinations play an important role to assist the fight against delta variant.Item Learning from SARS and MERS: COVID-19 reinfection where we stand?(Elsevier, 2021) Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Rabaan, Ali A.; Al-Omari, Awad; Al Mutair, Abbas; Al-Qahtani, Manaf; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Multifaceted realities of scrub typhus: a case series from southern India(Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 2023-09-01) Ravikumar, Diviya Bharathi; Sivasubramanian, Barath Prashanth; Shanmugam, Sruthi Nandhaa; Krishnaswamy, Vanitha; Rabaan, Ali; Al-Tawfig, Jaffar A.; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Medicine, School of MedicineScrub typhus is an acute febrile illness caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi, a Gram-negative bacillus, commonly occurring in the Asia-Pacific region. It is transmitted to humans by the bite of an infected Leptotrombidium mite and the bacterium causes endothelial dysfunction resulting in widespread vasculitis and the possible development of thrombocytopenia, meningitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and infrequently, myocarditis. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in managing scrub typhus. Here, we present four cases of scrub typhus with a comprehensive literature review. This study highlights the significance of considering scrub typhus as a possible diagnosis in patients of all ages from endemic regions who exhibit symptoms such as fever, thrombocytopenia, or transaminitis, even in the absence of typical clinical features. Two cases exhibited the characteristic lesion of eschar at the site of mite feeding. One case involved a middle-aged woman who was diagnosed with typhus-induced myocarditis with left ventricular dysfunction. Another case involved a 23-day-old neonate with poor feeding and seizures, who was diagnosed with late-onset sepsis with meningitis. Scrub typhus was confirmed in all cases using a positive qualitative IgM ELISA. However, it is preferred to use paired (ELISA before and after antibiotic therapy) or quantitative titers for confirmation. Healthcare providers must consider the patient’s exposure history and clinical presentation to diagnose and treat scrub typhus promptly.Item A narrative review of emergency use authorization versus full FDA approval and its effect on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy(University of Saler, 2021-09-10) Koritala, Thoyaja; Hussain, Akbar; Pleshkova, Yelena; Dondapati, Lavanya; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Rabaan, Ali A.; Al Mutair, Abbas; Alhumaid, Saad; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Kashyap, Rahul; Medicine, School of MedicineCOVID-19 pandemic affected the lives of many with its devastating mortality and morbidity. Acquisition of herd immunity is one way to mitigate the spread of infection. Many factors influence the acceptance of vaccination including the regulatory process of the vaccines. This review article will briefly summarize the Emergency Use Authorization, Full FDA Approval process and highlight how the key factors affecting the vaccination hesitancy, are being influenced by the lack of Full FDA Approval.Item Vaccine Derived Poliovirus (VDPV)(Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 2023-06-01) Mohanty, Aroop; Rohilla, Ranjana; Zaman, Kamran; Hada, Vivek; Dhakal, Surakchhya; Shah, Abhishek; Padhi, Bijaya Kumar; Al-qaim, Zahra Haleem; Altawfiq, Kauthar Jaffar A.; Tirupathi, Raghavendra; Sah, Ranjit; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Medicine, School of MedicinePoliomyelitis is caused by Poliovirus, a member of a large group of enteroviruses. Vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) stem from mutated live poliovirus, which is contained in the Oral Polio Virus vaccine (OPV). In addition, the emergence of VDPV is one of the global challenges for the eradication of poliomyelitis. VDPVs continue to affect different parts of the world; 1081 cases occurred in 2020 and 682 cases in 2021. There are several reasons that may have caused the increase in circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) after the “switch” from the trivalent to the bivalent oral polio vaccine. One reason is the low vaccination rate among the targeted population, which has been further aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Several strategies could control the spread of VDPV including the use of the monovalent OPV (mOPV-2). The risk of VDPV can be minimized through increased immunization rates and the use of safer vaccine alternatives. The global effort to eradicate polio has made significant progress over the years, but continued vigilance and investment in immunization programs are needed to achieve the ultimate goal of a polio-free world.