ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Timmerman, Robert"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Superimposition of beams to vary shot size in gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery
    (American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2002) Bank, Morris I.; Timmerman, Robert; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    The Leksell Gamma Knife [Elekta Corp] uses helmets as collimators to produce four standard beam sizes. The nominal beam diameters are 18, 14, 8, and 4 mm. During computer treatment planning for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery, the size of the treated volume may differ from the standard beam sizes. To maintain conformality of the isodose curves to the treated volume, beam sizes may be superimposed during computer treatment planning to produce beam diameters that are intermediate to the standard beams. A study of superimposed gamma knife beams was performed to confirm the accuracy of this method and to verify the accuracy of the GammaPlan treatment planning computer. Superimposed beams were simulated on the Elekta treatment planning computer, GammaPlan, version 4.12, and tested by film measurements of beam profiles for single helmet sizes and superimposed shots with various beam weightings. The weighting for each beam size is varied to attain the beam size diameter desired. The beams were defined at the 50% isodose line. The profiles of the superimposed beams were obtained and compared with the single helmet shots. The uniformity of the resulting beams was measured. The results show a linear relationship between beam size and beam weighting for the superimposed beams. The film measurements confirm the computer calculations.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University