- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Thygesen, John C."
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings(Thieme, 2018-08) Thygesen, John C.; Ponugoti, Prasanna; Tippins, William W.; Garcia, Jonathan R.; Sullivan, Andrew W.; Broadley, Heather M.; Rex, Douglas K.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and study aims: Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. Patients and methods: We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. Results: There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P = 0.0005). Conclusion: EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted.