Browsing by Author "Thompson, Sean M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Emergency Department Provider Survey Regarding Acute Sickle Cell Pain Management
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020) Martin, Olufunke Y.; Thompson, Sean M.; Carroll, Aaron E.; Jacob, Seethal A.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Sickle cell disease (SCD) can lead to potentially devastating complications that occur secondary to vaso-occlusion. Current national clinical guidelines are largely based on expert opinion, resulting in significant variation of management. Provider awareness regarding emergency department (ED) management of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) remains unknown. A 23-question assessment of VOC management was administered to all eligible ED providers at Riley Hospital for Children between September and November 2018. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate responses between groups. Of 52 respondents comprised of ED staff attendings (27%), resident trainees (58%), and ED nurses (15%), the majority were not aware of SCD management guidelines being available. Approximately 54% of providers endorsed a high comfort level in managing VOC, with staff and nurses more likely to report this than trainees (P = 0.02). Less than 10% of all providers knew the recommended timeframe from triage to initial medication administration. Prolonged time between pain assessments was reported by 25% of providers with a high comfort level in managing VOC, which was similar to providers with a lower comfort level (13%, P = 0.217). Only one fourth of all respondents appropriately did not use vital signs as an indication of a patient’s pain level, and > 10% reported not utilizing patient-reported pain scores. This was not significantly different between provider comfort levels (P = 0.285 and 0.412, relatively). Our results suggest education regarding recommended practices was inadequate regardless of reported provider comfort. Further provider education and/or standardized ED VOC management guidelines may serve as areas for improvement in SCD care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Association Between COVID-19 and Febrile Seizure: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Hanlon, Sean M.; Sim, Don; Schneider, Jack G.; Yang, Ziyi; Thompson, Sean M.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background/objective: Throughout the pandemic, febrile seizures have resulted from infection secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The objective of this study is to determine if there is an increased association between COVID-19 and febrile seizures as compared with other causes of febrile seizures. Methods: This was a retrospective case control study. Data were collected from the National Institute of Health (NIH) supported National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Patients from 6 to 60 months who were tested for COVID-19 were included; cases were defined as COVID-19-positive patients whereas controls were defined as COVID-19-negative patients. Febrile seizures diagnosed within 48 hours of the COVID-19 test were considered to be associated with the test result. Patients were subjected to a stratified gender and date matching design followed by a logistic regression controlling for age and race. Results: During the study period, 27,692 patients were included. Of those, 6923 patients were COVID-19-positive, among which 189 had febrile seizures (2.7%). After logistic regression, the likelihood of having febrile seizures concurrently with COVID-19 as compared with other causes was 0.96 ( P = 0.949; confidence interval, 0.81, 1.14). Conclusions: There were 2.7% of the patients with COVID-19 that were diagnosed with a febrile seizure. However, when subjected to a matched case control design with logistic regression controlling for confounding variables, there does not appear to be an increased risk of febrile seizures secondary to COVID-19 as compared with other causes.