Browsing by Author "Thompson, Michael A."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Disease Recurrence in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of the BRE12-158 Randomized Clinical Trial
    (American Medical Association, 2020-09) Radovich, Milan; Jiang, Guanglong; Hancock, Bradley A.; Chitambar, Christopher; Nanda, Rita; Falkson, Carla; Lynce, Filipa C.; Gallagher, Christopher; Isaacs, Claudine; Blaya, Marcelo; Paplomata, Elisavet; Walling, Radhika; Daily, Karen; Mahtani, Reshma; Thompson, Michael A.; Graham, Robert; Cooper, Maureen E.; Pavlick, Dean C.; Albacker, Lee A.; Gregg, Jeffrey; Solzak, Jeffrey P.; Chen, Yu-Hsiang; Bales, Casey L.; Cantor, Erica; Shen, Fei; Storniolo, Anna Maria V.; Badve, Sunil; Ballinger, Tarah J.; Chang, Chun-Li; Zhong, Yuan; Savran, Cagri; Miller, Kathy D.; Schneider, Bryan P.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Importance: A significant proportion of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery, along with enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), may be used to detect minimal residual disease and assess which patients may experience disease recurrence. Objective: To determine whether the presence of ctDNA and CTCs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC is independently associated with recurrence and clinical outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: A preplanned secondary analysis was conducted from March 26, 2014, to December 18, 2018, using data from 196 female patients in BRE12-158, a phase 2 multicenter randomized clinical trial that randomized patients with early-stage TNBC who had residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to receive postneoadjuvant genomically directed therapy vs treatment of physician choice. Patients had blood samples collected for ctDNA and CTCs at time of treatment assignment; ctDNA analysis with survival was performed for 142 patients, and CTC analysis with survival was performed for 123 patients. Median clinical follow-up was 17.2 months (range, 0.3-58.3 months). Interventions: Circulating tumor DNA was sequenced using the FoundationACT or FoundationOneLiquid Assay, and CTCs were enumerated using an epithelial cell adhesion molecule-based, positive-selection microfluidic device. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 196 female patients (mean [SD] age, 49.6 [11.1] years), detection of ctDNA was significantly associated with inferior DDFS (median DDFS, 32.5 months vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% CI, 1.38-6.48; P = .006). At 24 months, DDFS probability was 56% for ctDNA-positive patients compared with 81% for ctDNA-negative patients. Detection of ctDNA was similarly associated with inferior DFS (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.28-5.57; P = .009) and inferior OS (HR, 4.16; 95% CI,1.66-10.42; P = .002). The combination of ctDNA and CTCs provided additional information for increased sensitivity and discriminatory capacity. Patients who were ctDNA positive and CTC positive had significantly inferior DDFS compared with those who were ctDNA negative and CTC negative (median DDFS, 32.5 months vs not reached; HR, 5.29; 95% CI, 1.50-18.62; P = .009). At 24 months, DDFS probability was 52% for patients who were ctDNA positive and CTC positive compared with 89% for those who were ctDNA negative and CTC negative. Similar trends were observed for DFS (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.07-9.27; P = .04) and OS (HR, 8.60; 95% CI, 1.78-41.47; P = .007). Conclusions and relevance: In this preplanned secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, detection of ctDNA and CTCs in patients with early-stage TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with disease recurrence, which represents an important stratification factor for future postneoadjuvant trials.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in routine clinical practice: effectiveness in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
    (Taylor & Francis, 2021) Hájek, Roman; Minařík, Jiří; Straub, Jan; Pour, Luděk; Jungova, Alexandra; Berdeja, Jesus G.; Boccadoro, Mario; Brozova, Lucie; Spencer, Andrew; van Rhee, Frits; Vela-Ojeda, Jorge; Thompson, Michael A.; Abonour, Rafat; Chari, Ajai; Cook, Gordon; Costello, Caitlin L.; Davies, Faith E.; Hungria, Vania T. M.; Lee, Hans C.; Leleu, Xavier; Puig, Noemi; Rifkin, Robert M.; Terpos, Evangelos; Usmani, Saad Z.; Weisel, Katja C.; Zonder, Jeffrey A.; Bařinová, Magda; Kuhn, Matyáš; Šilar, Jiří; Čápková, Lenka; Galvez, Kenny; Lu, Jin; Elliott, Jennifer; Stull, Dawn Marie; Ren, Kaili; Maisnar, Vladimír; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from the global, observational INSIGHT MM and the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies were integrated and analyzed. Results: At data cut-off, 263 patients from 13 countries were included. Median time from diagnosis to start of IRd was 35.8 months; median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months. Overall response rate was 73%, median progression-free survival, 21.2 months and time-to-next therapy, 33.0 months. Ixazomib/lenalidomide dose reductions were required in 17%/36% of patients; 32%/30% of patients discontinued ixazomib/lenalidomide due to adverse events. Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of IRd in routine clinical practice are comparable to those reported in TOURMALINE-MM1.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rates of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination and Correlation With Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients
    (Elsevier, 2023) Thompson, Michael A.; Boccadoro, Mario; Leleu, Xavier; Vela-Ojeda, Jorge; van Rhee, Frits; Weisel, Katja C.; Rifkin, Robert M.; Usmani, Saad Z.; Hájek, Roman; Cook, Gordon; Abonour, Rafat; Armour, Mira; Morgan, Kathryn E.; Yeh, Su-Peng; Costello, Caitlin L.; Berdeja, Jesus G.; Davies, Faith E.; Zonder, Jeffrey A.; Lee, Hans C.; Omel, Jim; Spencer, Andrew; Terpos, Evangelos; Hungria, Vania T. M.; Puig, Noemi; Fu, Chengcheng; Ferrari, Renda H.; Ren, Kaili; Stull, Dawn Marie; Chari, Ajai; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Infections are a common reason for hospitalization and death in multiple myeloma (MM). Although pneumococcal vaccination (PV) and influenza vaccination (FV) are recommended for MM patients, data on vaccination status and outcomes are limited in MM. Materials and methods: We utilized data from the global, prospective, observational INSIGHT MM study to analyze FV and PV rates and associated outcomes of patients with MM enrolled 2016-2019. Results: Of the 4307 patients enrolled, 2543 and 2500 had study-entry data on FV and PV status. Overall vaccination rates were low (FV 39.6%, PV 30.2%) and varied by region. On separate multivariable analyses of overall survival (OS) by Cox model, FV in the prior 2 years and PV in the prior 5 years impacted OS (vs. no vaccination; FV: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P = .003; PV: HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.63; P < .0001) when adjusted for age, region, performance status, disease stage, cytogenetics at diagnosis, MM symptoms, disease status, time since diagnosis, and prior transplant. Proportions of deaths due to infections were lower among vaccinated versus non-vaccinated patients (FV: 9.8% vs. 15.3%, P = .142; PV: 9.9% vs. 18.0%, P = .032). Patients with FV had generally lower health resource utilization (HRU) versus patients without FV; patients with PV had higher or similar HRU versus patients without PV. Conclusion: Vaccination is important in MM and should be encouraged. Vaccination status should be recorded in prospective clinical trials as it may affect survival.