Browsing by Author "The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP)"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating the association between APOE genotypes and cognitive resilience in SuperAgers
    (Wiley, 2025-01-03) Durant, Alaina; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Bush, William S.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Hassenstab, Jason J.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Mayeux, Richard; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Crane, Paul K.; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: “SuperAgers” are older adults (ages 80+) whose cognitive performance resembles that of adults in their 50s to mid‐60s. Factors underlying their exemplary aging are underexplored in large, racially diverse cohorts. Using eight cohorts, we investigated the frequency of APOE genotypes in SuperAgers compared to middle‐aged and older adults. Method: Harmonized, longitudinal memory, executive function, and language scores in Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) and Non‐Hispanic Black (NHB) participants were obtained from the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization Consortium. Scores were age‐ and sex‐adjusted. SuperAgers (NHW = 1,625; NHB = 106) included individuals 80+ years of age with a memory score equal to or exceeding individuals aged 50‐64 and language and executive function domain scores within normal limits who remain cognitively normal across visits. SuperAgers were compared to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases (NHW = 8,400; NHB = 925) and cognitively normal controls (NHW = 7,355; NHB = 1,305), as well as age‐defined subgroups (Young = ages 50‐64, Older = ages 65‐79, Oldest‐Old = age 80+). We performed binary logistic regression analyses comparing APOE‐ε2 and APOE‐ε4 alleles (0 = none, 1 = 1+ alleles present) among SuperAgers and their counterparts, covarying for sex and education. We corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini‐Hochberg procedure. Results: Across racial groups, SuperAgers had significantly higher proportions with APOE‐ε2 alleles and lower proportions with APOE‐ε4 alleles compared to cases (Table 1, Figure 1). Similar differences were observed between SuperAgers and Young and Old Controls, although differences were restricted to APOE‐ε4 in NHB comparisons. NHW SuperAgers had lower proportions with APOE‐ε4 alleles compared to Oldest‐Old Controls; APOE‐ε2 proportions did not differ. Conclusion: Within our large, harmonized cohort, larger proportions of SuperAgers had APOE‐ε2 alleles and smaller proportions had APOE‐ε4 alleles than AD cases across both NHW and NHB participants. Crucially, higher proportions of NHW SuperAgers had APOE‐ε2 alleles than younger controls (ages<80) and lower proportions had APOE‐ε4 alleles than all controls including age‐matched controls (ages 80+). This work provides the strongest evidence to date that APOE is associated with SuperAging. APOE‐ε2 did not differentiate NHB SuperAgers from controls nor APOE‐ε4 from other oldest‐old adults in present analyses. Future work will extend to whole genome analysis to identify novel genomic drivers of SuperAging.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating the association of APOE genotype and cognitive resilience in SuperAgers
    (medRxiv, 2025-01-07) Durant, Alaina; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Klinedinst, Brandon S.; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Hassenstab, Jason; Naj, Adam C.; Wang, Li-San; Johnson, Sterling C.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Bush, William S.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Mayeux, Richard; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Thompson, Paul M.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Crane, Paul K.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Archer, Derek B.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Importance: "SuperAgers" are oldest-old adults (ages 80+) whose memory performance resembles that of adults in their 50s to mid-60s. Factors underlying their exemplary memory are underexplored in large, racially diverse cohorts. Objective: To determine the frequency of APOE genotypes in non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White SuperAgers compared to middle-aged (ages 50-64), old (ages 65-79), and oldest-old (ages 80+) controls and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia cases. Design: This multicohort study selected data from eight longitudinal cohort studies of normal aging and AD. Setting: Variable recruitment criteria and follow-up intervals, including both population-based and clinical-based samples. Participants: Inclusion in our analyses required APOE genotype, that participants be age 50+, and are identified as either non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White. In total, 18,080 participants were included in the present study with a total of 78,549 datapoints. Main outcomes and measures: Harmonized, longitudinal memory, executive function, and language scores were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium (ADSP-PHC). SuperAgers, controls, and AD dementia cases were identified by cognitive scores using a residual approach and clinical diagnoses across multiple timepoints when available. SuperAgers were compared to AD dementia cases and cognitively normal controls using age-defined bins (middle-aged, old, oldest-old). Results: Across racialized groups, SuperAgers had significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles and lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles compared to cases. Similar differences were observed between SuperAgers and middle-aged and old controls. Non-Hispanic White SuperAgers had significantly lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles and significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles compared to all cases and controls, including oldest-old controls. In contrast, non-Hispanic Black SuperAgers had significantly lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles compared to cases and younger controls, and significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles compared only to cases. Conclusions and relevance: In the largest study to date, we demonstrated strong evidence that the frequency of APOE-ε4 and -ε2 alleles differ between non-Hispanic White SuperAgers and AD dementia cases and cognitively normal controls. Differences in the role of APOE in SuperAging by race underlines distinctions in mechanisms conferring resilience across race groups given likely differences in genetic ancestry.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex-specific genetic predictors of memory, executive function, and language performance
    (Wiley, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse B.; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Clark, Lindsay R.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Kukull, Walter A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is more prevalent in women than men, and robust evidence shows sex differences in the biological response to the AD neuropathological cascade. However, there is a lack of large-scale genetic studies on sex-specific genetic predictors of AD-related cognitive outcomes. Thus, we sought to elucidate the sex-specific genetic etiology of memory, executive function, and language performance. Method: This study included six cohorts of cognitive aging (Nmales=7,267, Nfemales=9,518). We applied psychometric approaches to build harmonized memory, executive function, and language composite scores. Next, for all domains, we calculated slopes from the cognitive scores (two or more timepoints) with linear mixed effects models. Then we performed sex-stratified and sex-interaction GWAS on these phenotypes, covarying for baseline age and the first three genetic principal components. We meta-analyzed across cohorts with a fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analyses for all models restricted the sample to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Result: In addition to well-established associations with cognition at the APOE locus, we identified three genetic loci that showed sex-specific effects with cognition. A chromosome 16 locus (rs114106271), a splicing-quantitative trait locus for RP11-152O14.4 and LINC02180 in the testis (GTEx), associated with baseline memory performance in men (β=0.13, P=2.40×10-8; PInteraction=8.96×10-6; Figures 1-2) but not in women (β=-0.01, P=0.76). A chromosome 14 locus (rs34074573), an expression-quantitative trait locus (GTEx) for HOMEZ (a homeobox gene), and for BCL2L2 (a previously reported AD risk gene), associated with longitudinal memory performance in men (β=-0.01, P=4.15×10-8; PInteraction=5.83×10-7; Figures 3-4) but not in women (β=0.001, P=0.09). Finally, a chromosome 6 locus (rs9382966) associated with longitudinal language performance in men with near genome-wide significance (β=-0.004, P=6.29×10-8; PInteraction=2.01×10-4) but not in women (β=-0.0003, P=0.61). Conclusion: Our results highlight some key sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive outcomes. Findings further suggest that some sex-specific genetic predictors have domain-specific associations, providing an exciting opportunity to better understand the molecular basis of memory, executive function, and language through genomic analysis. Although our findings need to be replicated, our GWAS analyses highlight the contribution of sex-specific genetic predictors beyond the APOE locus in conferring risk for late-life cognitive decline.