Browsing by Author "Tabbey, Rebeka"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Health Outcomes and Cost of Care Among Older Adults with Schizophrenia: A 10-Year Study Using Medical Records across the Continuum of Care
    (Elsevier, 2014-05) Hendrie, Hugh C.; Tu, Wanzhu; Tabbey, Rebeka; Purnell, Christianna E.; Ambuehl, Roberta J.; Callahan, Christopher M.; Department of Psychiatry, IU School of Medicine
    Objectives The population of older patients with schizophrenia is increasing. This study describes health outcomes, utilization, and costs over 10 years in a sample of older patients with schizophrenia compared to older patients without schizophrenia. Design, Setting, Participants An observational cohort study of 31,588 older adults (mean age 70.44 years) receiving care from an urban public health system, including a community mental health center, during 1999–2008. 1635 (5.2%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia and 757 (2.4%) had this diagnosis confirmed in the community mental health center. Patients’ electronic medical records were merged with Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, the Minimum Dataset, and the Outcome and Assessment Information Set. Information on medication use was not available. Measurements Rates of comorbid conditions, health care utilization, costs, and mortality. Results Patients with schizophrenia had significantly higher rates of congestive heart failure (45.05% v. 38.84%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52.71% v. 41.41%), and hypothyroidism (36.72% v. 26.73%) than the patients without schizophrenia (p<0.001). They had significantly lower rates of cancer (30.78% v. 43.18%) and significantly higher rates of dementia (64.46% v. 32.13%). The patients with schizophrenia had significantly higher mortality risk (HR: 1.25, CI: 1.07–1.47) than the patients without schizophrenia. They also had significantly higher rates of health care utilization. The mean costs for Medicare and Medicaid were significantly higher for the patients with schizophrenia than for the patients without schizophrenia. Conclusions The management of older adult patients with schizophrenia is creating a serious burden for our health care system, requiring the development of integrated models of health care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence and correlates of pain and pain treatment in a western Kenya referral hospital
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2013-10) Huang, Kristin T. L.; Owino, Claudio; Gramelspacher, Gregory P.; Monahan, Patrick O.; Tabbey, Rebeka; Hagembe, Mildred; Strother, Robert M.; Njuguna, Festus; Vreeman, Rachel C.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Pain is often inadequately evaluated and treated in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess pain levels and pain treatment in 400 hospitalized patients at a national referral hospital in western Kenya, and to identify factors associated with pain and pain treatment. DESIGN: Using face-validated Kiswahili versions of two single-item pain assessment tools, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), we determined patients' pain levels. Additional data collected included patient demographics, prescribed analgesics, and administered analgesics. We calculated mean pain ratings and pain management index (PMI) scores. RESULTS: Averaged between the NRS and FPS-R, 80.5% of patients endorsed a nonzero level of pain and 30% of patients reported moderate to severe pain. Older patients, patients with HIV, and cancer patients had higher pain ratings. Sixty-six percent of patients had been prescribed analgesics at some point during their hospitalization, the majority of which were nonopioids. A majority of patients (66%) had undertreated pain (negative scores on the PMI). CONCLUSION: This study shows that hospitalized patients in Kenya are experiencing pain and that this pain is often undertreated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence and Correlates of Pain and Pain Treatment in a Western Kenya Referral Hospital
    (2013-10) Huang, Kristin TL.; Owino, Claudio; Gramelspacher, Gregory P.; Monahan, Patrick O.; Tabbey, Rebeka; Hagembe, Mildred; Strother, Robert M.; Njuguna, Festus; Vreeman, Rachel C.
    Background: Pain is often inadequately evaluated and treated in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Objective: We sought to assess pain levels and pain treatment in 400 hospitalized patients at a national referral hospital in western Kenya, and to identify factors associated with pain and pain treatment. Design: Using face-validated Kiswahili versions of two single-item pain assessment tools, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Faces Pain Scale–Revised (FPS-R), we determined patients' pain levels. Additional data collected included patient demographics, prescribed analgesics, and administered analgesics. We calculated mean pain ratings and pain management index (PMI) scores. Results: Averaged between the NRS and FPS-R, 80.5% of patients endorsed a nonzero level of pain and 30% of patients reported moderate to severe pain. Older patients, patients with HIV, and cancer patients had higher pain ratings. Sixty-six percent of patients had been prescribed analgesics at some point during their hospitalization, the majority of which were nonopioids. A majority of patients (66%) had undertreated pain (negative scores on the PMI). Conclusion: This study shows that hospitalized patients in Kenya are experiencing pain and that this pain is often undertreated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Using the National Cancer Institute’s Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool
    (Oxford University Press, 2017-01) Imperiale, Thomas F.; Yu, Menggang; Monahan, Patrick O.; Stump, Timothy E.; Tabbey, Rebeka; Glowinski, Elizabeth; Ransohoff, David F.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: There is no validated, discriminating, and easy-to-apply tool for estimating risk of colorectal neoplasia. We studied whether the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Risk Assessment Tool, which estimates future CRC risk, could estimate current risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia among average-risk persons. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved individuals age 50 to 80 years undergoing first-time screening colonoscopy. We measured medical and family history, lifestyle information, and physical measures and calculated each person’s future CRC risk using the NCI tool’s logistic regression equation. We related quintiles of future CRC risk to the current risk of advanced neoplasia (sessile serrated polyp or tubular adenoma ≥ 1 cm, a polyp with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, or CRC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: For 4457 (98.5%) with complete data (mean age = 57.2 years, SD = 6.6 years, 51.7% women), advanced neoplasia prevalence was 8.26%. Based on quintiles of five-year estimated absolute CRC risk, current risks of advanced neoplasia were 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3% to 3.3%), 4.8% (95% CI = 3.5% to 6.4%), 6.4% (95% CI = 4.9% to 8.2%), 10.0% (95% CI = 8.1% to 12.1%), and 17.6% (95% CI = 15.5% to 20.6%; P < .001). For quintiles of estimated 10-year CRC risk, corresponding current risks for advanced neoplasia were 2.2% (95% CI = 1.4% to 3.5%), 4.8% (95% CI = 3.5% to 6.4%), 6.5% (95% CI = 5.0% to 8.3%), 9.3% (95% CI = 7.5% to 11.4%), and 18.4% (95% CI = 15.9% to 21.1%; P < .001). Among persons with an estimated five-year CRC risk above the median, current risk for advanced neoplasia was 12.8%, compared with 3.7% among those below the median (relative risk = 3.4, 95 CI = 2.7 to 4.4). Conclusions: The NCI’s Risk Assessment Tool, which estimates future CRC risk, may be used to estimate current risk for advanced neoplasia, making it potentially useful for tailoring and improving CRC screening efficiency among average-risk persons.