Browsing by Author "Stewart, Jennifer"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of Prior Formal Education on Successful Thoracic Epidural Placement By Anesthesia Residents
    (Elsevier, 2020-11) Yeap, Yar Luan; Randolph, Tim; Lemmon, Adam J.; Mann, Miles D.; Stewart, Jennifer; Wolfe, John W.; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Objective: Catheter placement for thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is technically challenging; however, methods for teaching this technique to anesthesia residents have not been well-studied. The present study aimed to determine optimal teaching methods for proficient TEA catheter placement by comparing video-based formal resident education with traditional bedside training by attending physicians. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: Large academic hospital, single institution. Participants: The study comprised 76 postgraduate year 3 and 4 anesthesiology residents (38 intervention, 38 control). Interventions: Formal education included an instructional video on proper TEA technique. Measurements and Main Results: Measures of proficiency in TEA catheter placement included the time needed to complete the procedure successfully and the success of placement as indicated by patient confirmation. Residents who received formal video instruction had similar success in catheter placement and similar procedure times compared with the traditionally trained residents. The overall success rate was 99.2%, with faculty intervention required in only 17% of cases. More experienced residents (ie, having placed more epidural catheters) were faster at TEA catheter placement. Conclusions: Formal video education for TEA catheter placement provided no additional improvement of resident proficiency compared with traditional training at a high-volume academic center. The success rate was very high in this group of residents; however, experiences at other institutions may vary. Future studies are needed to determine optimum teaching strategies for TEA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Liposomal bupivacaine addition versus standard bupivacaine alone for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    (Future Medicine, 2022) Yeap, Yar L; Wolfe, John; Stewart, Jennifer; McCutchan, Amy; Chawla, Gulraj; Robb, Bruce; Holcomb, Bryan; Vickery, Ben; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Aim: This study evaluated use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials & methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients received QL1 blocks with either LB (40 ml 0.125% SB plus 20 ml of LB) or SB (60 ml of 0.25% SB) with 30 ml per side. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. Results: For 78 patients (38 LB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for metoclopramide. Conclusion: LB provided no analgesic benefit over SB alone for QL blocks. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT03702621 Lay abstract This study evaluated use of extended release bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in nerve blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery received nerve blocks with either LB combined with SB, or SB alone. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. For 78 patients (38 LB + SB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for anti-nausea medication. LB provided no pain control benefit over SB alone for nerve blocks in colorectal surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpation Techniques for Arterial Line Placement by Residents in a Teaching Institution
    (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2019-04) Yeap, Yar Luan; Wolfe, John W.; Stewart, Jennifer; Backfish, Kevin M.; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Background: Arterial line insertion is traditionally done by blind palpation. Residents may need multiple attempts for successful insertion, leading to longer procedure times and many failed attempts. Objective: We hypothesized that ultrasound guidance (USG) would be faster and more successful than traditional blind palpation (TBP) for radial artery line placement by residents. Methods: Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring a radial arterial line were randomized to either the USG or TBP groups. Exclusion criteria included a need for arterial line placement in an awake patient, emergent surgery, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class VI. After the induction of anesthesia, a postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) or PGY-4 anesthesia resident placed an arterial line by either USG or TBP. Results: A total of 412 patients and 85 of 106 residents (80%) in the training program were included. The 2 groups were similar with respect to sex, weight, height, ASA class, baseline systolic blood pressure, and baseline heart rate. USG was faster than TBP (mean times 171.1 ± 16.7 seconds versus 243.6 ± 23.5 seconds, P = .012), required fewer attempts (mean 1.78 ± 0.11 versus 2.48 ± 0.15, P = .035), and had an improved success rate (96% versus 90%, P = .012). Conclusions: We found that residents using USG in an academic institution resulted in significantly faster placement of the arterial lines, fewer attempts, and fewer catheters used.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
    (Elsevier, 2020-07) Yeap, Yar Luan; Wolfe, John W.; Backfish-White, Kevin M.; Young, Jerry V.; Stewart, Jennifer; Ceppa, DuyKhanh P.; Moser, Elizabeth A. S.; Birdas, Thomas J.; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Objective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has improved patient outcomes; however, postoperative pain remains potentially severe. The objective of this study was to compare adjunct analgesic modalities for VATS, including paravertebral nerve blockade (PVB) and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). Design Prospective, randomized trial. Setting Large academic hospital, single institution. Participants Adult patients undergoing VATS. Interventions Ultrasound-guided PVB catheter, ultrasound-guided single-injection PVB, or TEA. Measurements and Main Results Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (at rest and with knee flexion) and opioid usage were recorded. Pain scores (with movement) for the TEA group were lower than those for either PVB group at 24 hours (p ≤ 0.008) and for the PVB catheter group at 48 hours (p = 0.002). Opioid use in TEA group was lower than that for either PVB group at 24 and 48 hours (p < 0.001) and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Single-injection PVB was faster compared with PVB catheter placement (6 min v 12 min; p < 0.001) but similar to TEA (5 min). Patient satisfaction, nausea, sedation, and 6-month postsurgical pain did not differ between groups. Conclusions TEA led to lower pain scores and opioid requirement for VATS procedures compared with PVB techniques. Single-injection PVB was faster and equally as effective as PVB catheter, and it led to similar patient satisfaction as TEA; therefore, it should be considered in patients who are not ideal candidates for TEA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
    (Elsevier, 2020-07) Yeap, Yar Luan; Wolfe, John W.; Backfish-White, Kevin M.; Young, Jerry V.; Stewart, Jennifer; Ceppa, Duykhanh P.; Moser, Elizabeth A. S.; Birdas, Thomas J.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Objective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has improved patient outcomes; however, postoperative pain remains potentially severe. The objective of this study was to compare adjunct analgesic modalities for VATS, including paravertebral nerve blockade (PVB) and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). Design Prospective, randomized trial. Setting Large academic hospital, single institution. Participants Adult patients undergoing VATS. Interventions Ultrasound-guided PVB catheter, ultrasound-guided single-injection PVB, or TEA. Measurements and Main Results Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (at rest and with knee flexion) and opioid usage were recorded. Pain scores (with movement) for the TEA group were lower than those for either PVB group at 24 hours (p ≤ 0.008) and for the PVB catheter group at 48 hours (p = 0.002). Opioid use in TEA group was lower than that for either PVB group at 24 and 48 hours (p < 0.001) and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Single-injection PVB was faster compared with PVB catheter placement (6 min v 12 min; p < 0.001) but similar to TEA (5 min). Patient satisfaction, nausea, sedation, and 6-month postsurgical pain did not differ between groups. Conclusions TEA led to lower pain scores and opioid requirement for VATS procedures compared with PVB techniques. Single-injection PVB was faster and equally as effective as PVB catheter, and it led to similar patient satisfaction as TEA; therefore, it should be considered in patients who are not ideal candidates for TEA.