Browsing by Author "Stephens, Elizabeth H."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    2020 Women in Thoracic Surgery update on the status of women in cardiothoracic surgery
    (Elsevier, 2020) Ceppa, DuyKhanh P.; Antonoff, Mara B.; Tong, Betty C.; Timsina, Lava; Ikonomidis, John S.; Worrell, Stephanie G.; Stephens, Elizabeth H.; Gillaspie, Erin A.; Schumacher, Lana; Molena, Daniela; Kane, Lauren C.; Blackmon, Shanda; Donington, Jessica S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Women in Thoracic Surgery (WTS) has previously reported on the status of women in cardiothoracic (CT) surgery. We sought to provide a 10-year update on women in CT. Methods An anonymous REDCap survey link was emailed to female diplomats of the ABTS. Survey questions queried respondents regarding demographics, training, accolades, practice details, and career satisfaction. The survey link was open for 30 days. Results were compared to the 2019 Society of Thoracic Surgeons work force survey. Descriptive analyses were performed using frequency and proportions. Comparisons were performed using Student’s t-tests, Fisher exact and chi-squared tests. Results Of 354 female diplomats, 309 were contacted and 176 (57%) responded. The majority of respondents were age 36-50 (59%), Caucasian (67.4%), and graduated from traditional-track programs (91.4%). Most respondents reported practicing in an urban (64%) and academic setting (73.1%). 36.4% and 23.9% reported a general thoracic and adult cardiac practice (22.7% mixed practice, 9.6% congenital). Fifty percent of respondents reported salaries between $400,000-700,000 annually; 37.7% reported salaries <90% of their male colleagues. 21.6% of respondents in academia are full professor; 53.4% report having a leadership role. While 74.1% would pursue a career in CT again, only 27.3% agreed that CT surgery is a healthy and positive environment for women. Conclusions The number of women in CT surgery has steadily increased. While women are rising in academic rank and into leadership positions, salary disparities and the CT surgery work environment remain important issues in achieving a diverse work force.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current Status of Endovascular Training for Cardiothoracic Surgery Residents in the United States
    (Elsevier, 2017-11) Vardas, Panos N.; Stefanescu Schmidt, Ada C.; Lou, Xiaoying; Goldstone, Andrew B.; Pattakos, Gregory; Fiedler, Amy G.; Stephens, Elizabeth H.; Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Endovascular interventions for cardiovascular pathology are becoming increasingly relevant to cardiothoracic surgery. This study assessed the perceived prevalence and efficacy of endovascular skills training and identified differences among training paradigms. Methods Trainee responses to questions in the 2016 In-Service Training Examination survey regarding endovascular training were analyzed based on the four different cardiothoracic surgery training pathways: traditional 2- and 3-year thoracic, integrated 6-year, and combined 4+3 general and thoracic residency programs. Results The duration of endovascular training was substantially different among programs, at a median of 17 weeks for integrated 6-year, 8.5 weeks for 3-year, 6 weeks for 4+3, and 4 weeks for 2-year residency (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for year of training and program type, the duration of endovascular rotations was significantly associated with self-assessed comfort with catheter-based skills (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of residents rotated with trainees from other specialties, and 58% experienced competition for cases. Residents reported greater exposure to transcatheter aortic valve replacement than to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, cardiac catheterization, percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect, and transcatheter mitral valve surgery (p < 0.0001). A significant proportion of responders reported feeling uncomfortable performing key steps of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (52%) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (49%). Conclusions Considerable heterogeneity exists in endovascular training among cardiothoracic surgery training pathways, with a significant number of residents having minimal to no exposure to these emerging techniques. These findings highlight the need for a standardized curriculum to improve endovascular exposure and training.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Risks and Rewards of Advanced Practice Providers in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training: National Survey
    (Elsevier, 2018) Blitzer, David; Stephens, Elizabeth H.; Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang; Lou, Xiaoying; Chen, Peter; Pattakos, Greg; Vardas, Panos N.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Changes in healthcare have led to increasing utilization of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), but their role in Cardiothoracic Surgery (CTS) education remains undefined. This study aimed to analyze the extent of APP utilization on the CTS team, their role within the hierarchy of clinical care, and the impact of PEs on CTS training from the resident perspective. Methods CTS residents’ responses to the 2017 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association (TSRA)/Thoracic Surgery Directors Association (TSDA) In-Service Training Examination (ITE) survey regarding the role of APPs in specific clinical scenarios, and perception of APP contribution to residents’ educational environment were analyzed. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was performed in SPSS using a Fisher’s exact test and Pearson Chi-Square with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Response rate was 82.1% (280/341). The median number of employed APPs was 16-20 and 50.4% (n=141) reported 11-25 PEs at their institution. The median forAPPs in the operating room, floor, and intensive care unit was 3, 3, and 2 respectively. Overall impression of APPs was positive in 87.5% (n=245) of respondents, with 47.7% (n=133) being “very positive” and 40.1% being “positive” (n=112). In general, residents reported greater resident involvement in post-operative issues and operative consults and greater APP involvement in floor issues. 72.5% of residents had not missed a surgical opportunity due to APPs while, 9.6% missed an opportunity due to a APP despite being at an appropriate level of training. Of those that reported missed opportunities, 44% were I-6 residents. There were no significant differences in APPs’ operative role based on resident seniority. Conclusions The overall impression of APPs among CTS residents is favorable, and they more commonly are involved assisting on the floor or the operating room. Occasionally, residents report missing a surgical opportunity due to APPs. There is further opportunity to optimize and standardize their role within programs, in order to improve clinical outcomes and enhance the CTS educational experience for residents.