Browsing by Author "Stanek, Joseph R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Caregiver Perspectives on Patient Participation in Biological Pediatric Cancer Research
    (MDPI, 2022-06-16) Kendel, Nicole E.; Belsky, Jennifer A.; Stanek, Joseph R.; Streby, Keri A.; Shah, Nilay; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Adolescent cancer patients and their caregivers have demonstrated willingness to participate in invasive biological sampling, either for their own potential benefit or for research purposes. However, many malignancies occur primarily in prepubescent patients and there are no similar studies in this population. Our study objective was to assess the willingness of caregivers to consent to research studies involving invasive biological sampling in children ≤ 13 years of age. Participants completed a survey assessing their willingness to allow various procedures both with and without clinical benefit to their children. Most respondents were willing to allow additional blood draws regardless of potential benefit to their children (95.6% were willing when there would be benefits and 95.6% were willing when there would not). Although the overall willingness was lower with other hypothetical procedures, the majority of respondents were still willing to allow additional biopsies for research purposes. Caregivers of young children with cancer will allow their children to undergo additional invasive procedures for research purposes. This willingness decreased with more invasive procedures without potential direct benefit, but interest remained in more than half of participants. Caregivers for young patients with cancer should be approached for participation in future biological/correlative studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Investigating the safety and feasibility of osteopathic medicine in the pediatric oncology outpatient setting
    (Walter de Gruyter, 2022) Belsky, Jennifer A.; Stanek, Joseph R.; Rose , Melissa J.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Context: Pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy experience unwanted therapy-induced side effects, commonly constipation and pain that diminish quality of life. To date, few studies have investigated the safety and feasibility of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in pediatric oncology. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of OMT in pediatric oncology outpatient clinics. Methods: This is a single institutional pilot study evaluating children aged ≥2–21 years receiving chemotherapy for an oncological diagnosis at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (NCH). Permission was obtained from the NCH Institutional Review Board. Participants were enrolled for 8 weeks and received weekly OMT. OMT was deemed feasible by participating in six out of eight weekly treatments, and safety was assessed through adverse event grading per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). During the clinic visit, patients answered validated surveys on constipation (Bristol Stool Scale) and pain (FACES Scale) pre/post-OMT. Feasibility was analyzed utilizing a one-sided exact binomial test while validated tools and adverse events were summarized descriptively. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled, with 21 included in feasibility analyses. The majority of the patients were female (n=13, 61.9%), with a median age of 12 years at enrollment (range, 2.7–20.8 years). There were no serious adverse events attributed to OMT intervention, and among the patients assessed for feasibility, 100% of them participated in at least two-thirds of their weekly OMT treatments, meeting our defined feasibility criteria. The intervention lasted an average of 14.2 min (range, 7.2–19.2 min). There were no FACES or Bristol Stool Scale scores that correlated with worsening pain on constipation post-OMT intervention. Conclusions: Pediatric oncology patients were feasibly and safely able to receive OMT during a regularly scheduled chemotherapy visit. The limitations include the small sample size. These findings support the need to further investigate the safety and feasibility, as well as efficacy, of OMT in the pediatric oncology clinical setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Malnutrition identification and management variability: An administrative database study of children with solid tumors
    (Wiley, 2022) Runco, Daniel V.; Stanek, Joseph R.; Yeager, Nicholas D.; Belsky, Jennifer A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Malnutrition during cancer treatment increases treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Our study better characterizes variability in malnutrition identification and treatment by examining nutrition-related diagnoses and support for children with central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS solid tumors during therapy. We examined diagnosis of malnutrition, use of tube feeding or parenteral nutrition (PN), and appetite stimulants. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 0 to 21-year-old patients in the Pediatric Health Information System from 2015 to 2019. Patients were classified as having (1) billed malnutrition diagnosis, (2) malnutrition diagnosis or using PN and enteral nutrition ("functional malnutrition"), and (3) any previous criteria or prescribed appetite stimulants ("possible malnutrition"), as well as associated risk factors. Results: Among 13,375 unique patients, CNS tumors were most common (24.4%). Overall, 26.5% of patients had malnutrition diagnoses, 45.4% met functional malnutrition criteria, and 56.0% had possible malnutrition. Patients with adrenal tumors had highest billed, functional, and possible malnutrition (36.6%, 64.1%, and 69.4%, respectively) followed by CNS tumors (29.1%, 52.4%, and 64.1%). Patients with adrenal tumors had highest rates of PN use (47.4%) and those with CNS tumors had the highest tube feeding use (26.8%). Hospital admissions with malnutrition had a longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (6 vs 3 days, P < 0.0001), more emergency department admissions (24.4% vs 21.8%, P < 0.0001), and more opioid use (58.6% vs 41.4%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Variability in malnutrition diagnoses hinders clinical care and nutrition research in pediatric oncology. Improving disease-specific recognition and treatment of malnutrition can target nutrition support, ensure appropriate reimbursement, and potentially improve outcomes for children with solid tumors.