Browsing by Author "Sochet, Anthony A."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    AARC and PALISI Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Critical Asthma
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2025) White, Benjamin R.; Miller, Andrew G.; Baker, Joyce; Basnet, Sangita; Carroll, Christopher L.; Craven, Hannah J.; Dalabih, Abdallah; Fitzpatrick, Anne M.; Glogowski, Joel; Irazuzta, Jose Enrique; Kapuscinski, Christine A.; Lenox, Jesslyn; Lovinsky-Desir, Stephanie; Maue, Danielle K.; Moody, Gerald; Newth, Christopher; Rehder, Kyle J.; Sochet, Anthony A.; Said, Sana J.; Willis, L. Denise; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Goodfellow, Lynda; Abu-Sultaneh, Samer
    To address the lack of guidance for clinicians in their care of children with critical asthma, a multidisciplinary team of medical providers used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make the following recommendations: 1. We suggest the use of continuous inhaled short-acting β agonist (SABA) over frequent intermittent SABA in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 2. We suggest the use of either high- or low-dose continuous inhaled SABA regimens in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 3. We suggest the use of either dexamethasone or methylprednisolone (or an equivalent dose of prednisone/prednisolone) for children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 4. We suggest the use of intravenous (IV) magnesium (intermittent or continuous) as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) 5. We cannot recommend for or against the use of IV methylxanthines as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 6. We suggest the use of an IV SABA infusion as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) 7. We cannot recommend for or against the application of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children presenting with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 8. We suggest the use of bi-level positive airway pressure over conventional oxygen therapy in children presenting with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 9. We cannot recommend for or against the application of bi-level positive airway pressure over high-flow nasal cannula for children hospitalized with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 10. We cannot recommend for or against the application of heliox in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 11. We suggest the use of a dedicated protocol or pathway for managing children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Cohort Study
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2024-04-22) Russi, Brett W.; Roberts, Alexa R.; Nievas, Ignacio F.; Rogerson, Colin M.; Morrison, John M.; Sochet, Anthony A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) for pediatric critical asthma includes CPAP; bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP); and heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). We used the Virtual Pediatric System database to estimate NRS by prescribing rates for pediatric critical asthma and characterize patient clinical features and in-patient outcomes by the initial NRS device applied. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study from 125 participating pediatric ICUs among children 2-17 years of age hospitalized for critical asthma and prescribed NRS from 2017 through 2021. The primary outcomes were NRS modality prescribing rates and trends. Secondary outcomes were descriptive and included demographics, comorbidities, severity of illness indices, and NRS failure rates (defined as escalation from the initial NRS modality to invasive ventilation, HFNC to BPAP or CPAP, or CPAP to BPAP). Results: Of the 10,083 encounters studied, the initial NRS modalities prescribed varied widely by hospital center (HFNC: 69.7 ± 29.6%; BPAP: 27.2 ± 7.1%; CPAP: 3.1 ± 5.9%). The mean rates of HFNC use increased from 59.7% in 2017 to 71.9% in 2021 (+2.5%/y). In contrast, BPAP (-1.6%/y) and CPAP (-0.8%/y) utilization declined throughout the study period. Older children who were obese and with a higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-Probability of Mortality score were more frequently prescribed BPAP and CPAP compared with HFNC. Those children on HFNC experienced higher noninvasive respiratory support failure rates versus BPAP (7.3% vs 2.4%; P < .001) but a lower subsequent invasive ventilation rate versus BPAP (0.8% vs 2.4%; P < .001). Conclusions: In this multi-center cohort study, we observed that children with critical asthma are increasingly exposed to HFNC compared with BPAP and CPAP. Rates of HFNC failure were greater than those of BPAP failure, but a majority were transitioned to BPAP without subsequent invasive ventilation. The next steps include prospective trials, including practical end points such as patient comfort and optimal delivery of nebulized treatments to distinguish device superiority and suitable NRS utilization.