Browsing by Author "Skoog, Ingmar"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The changing prevalence and incidence of dementia over time — current evidence
    (Nature, 2017) Wu, Yu-Tzu; Beiser, Alexa S.; Breteler, Monique M. B.; Fratiglioni, Laura; Helmer, Catherine; Hendrie, Hugh C.; Honda, Hiroyuki; Ikram, M. Arfan; Langa, Kenneth M.; Lobo, Antonio; Matthews, Fiona E.; Ohara, Tomoyuki; Pérès, Karine; Qiu, Chengxuan; Seshadri, Sudha; Sjölund, Britt-Marie; Skoog, Ingmar; Brayne, Carol; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Dementia is an increasing focus for policymakers, civil organizations and multidisciplinary researchers. The most recent descriptive epidemiological research into dementia is enabling investigation into how the prevalence and incidence are changing over time. To establish clear trends, such comparisons need to be founded on population-based studies that use similar diagnostic and research methods consistently over time. This narrative Review synthesizes the findings from 14 studies that investigated trends in dementia prevalence (nine studies) and incidence (five studies) from Sweden, Spain, the UK, the Netherlands, France, the USA, Japan and Nigeria. Besides the Japanese study, these studies indicate stable or declining prevalence and incidence of dementia, and some provide evidence of sex-specific changes. No single risk or protective factor has been identified that fully explains the observed trends, but major societal changes and improvements in living conditions, education and healthcare might have favourably influenced physical, mental and cognitive health throughout an individual's life course, and could be responsible for a reduced risk of dementia in later life. Analytical epidemiological approaches combined with translational neuroscientific research could provide a unique opportunity to explore the neuropathology that underlies changing occurrence of dementia in the general population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: Protocol and methods from the Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium
    (Alzheimer’s Association, 2022-09-22) de Erausquin, Gabriel A.; Snyder, Heather; Brugha, Traolach S.; Seshadri, Sudha; Carrillo, Maria; Sagar, Rajesh; Huang, Yueqin; Newton, Charles; Tartaglia, Carmela; Teunissen, Charlotte; Håkanson, Krister; Akinyemi, Rufus; Prasad, Kameshwar; D'Avossa, Giovanni; Gonzalez-Aleman, Gabriela; Hosseini, Akram; Vavougios, George D.; Sachdev, Perminder; Bankart, John; Ole Mors, Niels Peter; Lipton, Richard; Katz, Mindy; Fox, Peter T.; Katshu, Mohammad Zia; Iyengar, M. Sriram; Weinstein, Galit; Sohrabi, Hamid R.; Jenkins, Rachel; Stein, Dan J.; Hugon, Jacques; Mavreas, Venetsanos; Blangero, John; Cruchaga, Carlos; Krishna, Murali; Wadoo, Ovais; Becerra, Rodrigo; Zwir, Igor; Longstreth, William T.; Kroenenberg, Golo; Edison, Paul; Mukaetova-Ladinska, Elizabeta; Staufenberg, Ekkehart; Figueredo-Aguiar, Mariana; Yécora, Agustín; Vaca, Fabiana; Zamponi, Hernan P.; Lo Re, Vincenzina; Majid, Abdul; Sundarakumar, Jonas; Gonzalez, Hector M.; Geerlings, Mirjam I.; Skoog, Ingmar; Salmoiraghi, Alberto; Boneschi, Filippo Martinelli; Patel, Vibuthi N.; Santos, Juan M.; Arroyo, Guillermo Rivera; Moreno, Antonio Caballero; Felix, Pascal; Gallo, Carla; Arai, Hidenori; Yamada, Masahito; Iwatsubo, Takeshi; Sharma, Malveeka; Chakraborty, Nandini; Ferreccio, Catterina; Akena, Dickens; Brayne, Carol; Maestre, Gladys; Williams Blangero, Sarah; Brusco, Luis I.; Siddarth, Prabha; Hughes, Timothy M.; Ramírez Zuñiga, Alfredo; Kambeitz, Joseph; Laza, Agustin Ruiz; Allen, Norrina; Panos, Stella; Merrill, David; Ibáñez, Agustín; Tsuang, Debby; Valishvili, Nino; Shrestha, Srishti; Wang, Sophia; Padma, Vasantha; Anstey, Kaarin J.; Ravindrdanath, Vijayalakshmi; Blennow, Kaj; Mullins, Paul; Łojek, Emilia; Pria, Anand; Mosley, Thomas H.; Gowland, Penny; Girard, Timothy D.; Bowtell, Richard; Vahidy, Farhaan S.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused >3.5 million deaths worldwide and affected >160 million people. At least twice as many have been infected but remained asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. COVID-19 includes central nervous system manifestations mediated by inflammation and cerebrovascular, anoxic, and/or viral neurotoxicity mechanisms. More than one third of patients with COVID-19 develop neurologic problems during the acute phase of the illness, including loss of sense of smell or taste, seizures, and stroke. Damage or functional changes to the brain may result in chronic sequelae. The risk of incident cognitive and neuropsychiatric complications appears independent from the severity of the original pulmonary illness. It behooves the scientific and medical community to attempt to understand the molecular and/or systemic factors linking COVID-19 to neurologic illness, both short and long term. Methods: This article describes what is known so far in terms of links among COVID-19, the brain, neurological symptoms, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. We focus on risk factors and possible molecular, inflammatory, and viral mechanisms underlying neurological injury. We also provide a comprehensive description of the Alzheimer's Association Consortium on Chronic Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (CNS SC2) harmonized methodology to address these questions using a worldwide network of researchers and institutions. Results: Successful harmonization of designs and methods was achieved through a consensus process initially fragmented by specific interest groups (epidemiology, clinical assessments, cognitive evaluation, biomarkers, and neuroimaging). Conclusions from subcommittees were presented to the whole group and discussed extensively. Presently data collection is ongoing at 19 sites in 12 countries representing Asia, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Discussion: The Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium harmonized methodology is proposed as a model to study long-term neurocognitive sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Key points: The following review describes what is known so far in terms of molecular and epidemiological links among COVID-19, the brain, neurological symptoms, and AD and related dementias (ADRD)The primary objective of this large-scale collaboration is to clarify the pathogenesis of ADRD and to advance our understanding of the impact of a neurotropic virus on the long-term risk of cognitive decline and other CNS sequelae. No available evidence supports the notion that cognitive impairment after SARS-CoV-2 infection is a form of dementia (ADRD or otherwise). The longitudinal methodologies espoused by the consortium are intended to provide data to answer this question as clearly as possible controlling for possible confounders. Our specific hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2 triggers ADRD-like pathology following the extended olfactory cortical network (EOCN) in older individuals with specific genetic susceptibility. The proposed harmonization strategies and flexible study designs offer the possibility to include large samples of under-represented racial and ethnic groups, creating a rich set of harmonized cohorts for future studies of the pathophysiology, determinants, long-term consequences, and trends in cognitive aging, ADRD, and vascular disease. We provide a framework for current and future studies to be carried out within the Consortium. and offers a "green paper" to the research community with a very broad, global base of support, on tools suitable for low- and middle-income countries aimed to compare and combine future longitudinal data on the topic. The Consortium proposes a combination of design and statistical methods as a means of approaching causal inference of the COVID-19 neuropsychiatric sequelae. We expect that deep phenotyping of neuropsychiatric sequelae may provide a series of candidate syndromes with phenomenological and biological characterization that can be further explored. By generating high-quality harmonized data across sites we aim to capture both descriptive and, where possible, causal associations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of Antihypertensives, Blood Pressure, and Estimated Risk of Dementia in Late Life: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
    (American Medical Association, 2023-09-05) Lennon, Matthew J.; Lam, Ben Chun Pan; Lipnicki, Darren M.; Crawford, John D.; Peters, Ruth; Schutte, Aletta E.; Brodaty, Henry; Thalamuthu, Anbupalam; Rydberg-Sterner, Therese; Najar, Jenna; Skoog, Ingmar; Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.; Röhr, Susanne; Pabst, Alexander; Lobo, Antonio; De-la-Cámara, Concepción; Lobo, Elena; Bello, Toyin; Gureje, Oye; Ojagbemi, Akin; Lipton, Richard B.; Katz, Mindy J.; Derby, Carol A.; Kim, Ki Woong; Han, Ji Won; Oh, Dae Jong; Rolandi, Elena; Davin, Annalisa; Rossi, Michele; Scarmeas, Nikolaos; Yannakoulia, Mary; Dardiotis, Themis; Hendrie, Hugh C.; Gao, Sujuan; Carrière, Isabelle; Ritchie, Karen; Anstey, Kaarin J.; Cherbuin, Nicolas; Xiao, Shifu; Yue, Ling; Li, Wei; Guerchet, Maëlenn M.; Preux, Pierre-Marie; Aboyans, Victor; Haan, Mary N.; Aiello, Allison E.; Ng, Tze Pin; Nyunt, Ma Shwe Zin; Gao, Qi; Scazufca, Marcia; Sachdev, Perminder S. S.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Importance: The utility of antihypertensives and ideal blood pressure (BP) for dementia prevention in late life remains unclear and highly contested. Objectives: To assess the associations of hypertension history, antihypertensive use, and baseline measured BP in late life (age >60 years) with dementia and the moderating factors of age, sex, and racial group. Data source and study selection: Longitudinal, population-based studies of aging participating in the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC) group were included. Participants were individuals without dementia at baseline aged 60 to 110 years and were based in 15 different countries (US, Brazil, Australia, China, Korea, Singapore, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Germany, Spain, Italy, France, Sweden, and Greece). Data extraction and synthesis: Participants were grouped in 3 categories based on previous diagnosis of hypertension and baseline antihypertensive use: healthy controls, treated hypertension, and untreated hypertension. Baseline systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were treated as continuous variables. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data reporting guidelines. Main outcomes and measures: The key outcome was all-cause dementia. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between the exposures and the key outcome variable. The association between dementia and baseline BP was modeled using nonlinear natural splines. The main analysis was a partially adjusted Cox proportional hazards model controlling for age, age squared, sex, education, racial group, and a random effect for study. Sensitivity analyses included a fully adjusted analysis, a restricted analysis of those individuals with more than 5 years of follow-up data, and models examining the moderating factors of age, sex, and racial group. Results: The analysis included 17 studies with 34 519 community dwelling older adults (20 160 [58.4%] female) with a mean (SD) age of 72.5 (7.5) years and a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.3 (4.3) years. In the main, partially adjusted analysis including 14 studies, individuals with untreated hypertension had a 42% increased risk of dementia compared with healthy controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.76; P = .001) and 26% increased risk compared with individuals with treated hypertension (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53; P = .02). Individuals with treated hypertension had no significant increased dementia risk compared with healthy controls (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07). The association of antihypertensive use or hypertension status with dementia did not vary with baseline BP. There was no significant association of baseline SBP or DBP with dementia risk in any of the analyses. There were no significant interactions with age, sex, or racial group for any of the analyses. Conclusions and relevance: This individual patient data meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies found that antihypertensive use was associated with decreased dementia risk compared with individuals with untreated hypertension through all ages in late life. Individuals with treated hypertension had no increased risk of dementia compared with healthy controls.