Browsing by Author "Shikany, Amy R."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinically relevant variants identified in thoracic aortic aneurysm patients by research exome sequencing
    (Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons), 2016-05) Schubert, Jeffrey A.; Landis, Benjamin J.; Shikany, Amy R.; Hinton, Robert B.; Ware, Stephanie M.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a genetically heterogeneous disease involving subclinical and progressive dilation of the thoracic aorta, which can lead to life-threatening complications such as dissection or rupture. Genetic testing is important for risk stratification and identification of at risk family members, and clinically available genetic testing panels have been expanding rapidly. However, when past testing results are normal, there is little evidence to guide decision-making about the indications and timing to pursue additional clinical genetic testing. Results from research based genetic testing can help inform this process. Here we present 10 TAA patients who have a family history of disease and who enrolled in research-based exome testing. Nine of these ten patients had previous clinical genetic testing that did not identify the cause of disease. We sought to determine the number of rare variants in 23 known TAA associated genes identified by research-based exome testing. In total, we found 10 rare variants in six patients. Likely pathogenic variants included a TGFB2 variant in one patient and a SMAD3 variant in another. These variants have been reported previously in individuals with similar phenotypes. Variants of uncertain significance of particular interest included novel variants in MYLK and MFAP5, which were identified in a third patient. In total, clinically reportable rare variants were found in 6/10 (60%) patients, with at least 2/10 (20%) patients having likely pathogenic variants identified. These data indicate that consideration of re-testing is important in TAA patients with previous negative or inconclusive results.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Comprehensive Clinical Genetics Approach to Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Infancy
    (Elsevier, 2020-12) Shikany, Amy R.; Landis, Benjamin J.; Parrott, Ashley; Miller, Erin M.; Coyan, Alyxis; Walters, Lauren; Hinton, Robert B.; Goldenberg, Paula; Ware, Stephanie M.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Objective: To investigate the frequency of genetic diagnoses among infants with critical congenital heart disease (CHD) using a comprehensive cardiovascular genetics approach and to identify genotype-phenotype correlations. Study design: A retrospective chart review of patients evaluated by cardiovascular genetics in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit from 2010 to 2015 was performed. Infants with CHD who were <1 month of age were included. CHD was classified using structured phenotype definitions. Cardiac and noncardiac phenotypes were tested for associations with abnormal genetic testing using χ1 and Fisher exact tests. Results: Genetic evaluation was completed in 293 infants with CHD, of whom 213 had isolated congenital heart disease (iCHD) and 80 had multiple congenital anomalies. Overall, the yield of abnormal genetic testing was 26%. The multiple congenital anomalies cohort had a greater yield of genetic testing (39%) than the iCHD cohort (20%) (OR 2.7). Using a non-hierarchical CHD classification and excluding 22q11.2 deletion and common aneuploidies, right ventricular obstructive defects were associated with abnormal genetic testing (P = .0005). Extracardiac features associated with abnormal genetic testing included ear, nose, and throat (P = .003) and brain (P = .0001) abnormalities. A diagnosis of small for gestational age or intrauterine growth retardation also was associated with abnormal genetic testing (P = .0061), as was presence of dysmorphic features (P = .0033, OR 3.5). Infants without dysmorphia with iCHD or multiple congenital anomalies had similar frequencies of abnormal genetic testing. Conclusions: The present study provides evidence to support a comprehensive cardiovascular genetics approach in evaluating infants with critical CHD while also identifying important genotype-phenotype considerations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current approach to genetic testing and genetic evaluation referrals for adults with congenital heart disease
    (Frontiers Media, 2024-05-13) Oehlman, Laura B.; Opotowsky, Alexander R.; Weaver, Kathryn N.; Brown, Nicole M.; Barnett, Cara L.; Miller, Erin M.; He, Hua; Shikany, Amy R.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly. Up to 33% have an identifiable genetic etiology. Improved medical and surgical management of CHD has translated into longer life expectancy and a rapidly growing population of adults living with CHD. The adult CHD (ACHD) population did not have access during childhood to the genetic technologies available today and therefore have not had a robust genetic evaluation that is currently recommended for infants with CHD. Given this potential benefit; the aims of this study were to determine how ACHD cardiologists offer genetics services to patients and identify the indications that influence decision-making for genetics care. Methods: We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study of ACHD cardiologists. A study-developed questionnaire was distributed via emailed REDCap link. The recruitment email was sent to 104 potential respondents. The survey was open from 06/2022 to 01/2023. Results: Thirty-five cardiologists participated in the study (response rate of 34%). Most cardiologists identified as white (77%) and male (66%). Cardiologists were more likely to refer patients to genetics (91%) than to order testing themselves (57%). Of the testing ordered, chromosomal testing (55%) was ordered more than gene sequencing (14%). Most cardiologists would refer a patient with a conotruncal lesion (interrupted aortic arch) over other indications for a genetics evaluation. There were more reported barriers to ordering genetic testing (66%) compared to referring to genetics for a genetics evaluation (23%). Cardiologists were more confident recognizing features suggestive of a genetic syndrome than ordering the correct test (p = 0.001). Regarding associations between clinical factors and current practices, more years in practice trended towards less referrals and testing. Evaluating a greater number of patients (p = 0.11) and greater confidence recognizing syndromic features (p = 0.12) and ordering the correct test (p = 0.09) were all associated with ordering more testing. Conclusion: Testing for microdeletion syndromes is being offered and completed in the ACHD population, however testing for single-gene disorders associated with CHD is being under-utilized. Developing guidelines for genetic testing in adults with CHD could increase access to genetic services, impact medical management, reduce uncertainty regarding prognosis, and inform recurrence risk estimates.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Exome Sequencing Identifies Candidate Genetic Modifiers of Syndromic and Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Severity
    (Springer Nature, 2017-08) Landis, Benjamin J.; Schubert, Jeffrey A.; Lai, Dongbing; Jegga, Anil G.; Shikany, Amy R.; Foroud, Tatiana; Ware, Stephanie M.; Hinton, Robert B.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a genetic disease predisposing to aortic dissection. It is important to identify the genetic modifiers controlling penetrance and expressivity to improve clinical prognostication. Exome sequencing was performed in 27 subjects with syndromic or familial TAA presenting with extreme phenotypes (15 with severe TAA; 12 with mild or absent TAA). Family-based analysis of a subset of the cohort identified variants, genes, and pathways segregating with TAA severity among three families. A rare missense variant in ADCK4 (p.Arg63Trp) segregated with mild TAA in each family. Genes and pathways identified in families were further investigated in the entire cohort using the optimal unified sequence kernel association test, finding significance for the gene COL15A1 (p = 0.025) and the retina homeostasis pathway (p = 0.035). Thus, we identified candidate genetic modifiers of TAA severity by exome-based study of extreme phenotypes, which may lead to improved risk stratification and development of new medical therapies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Genetic Testing in Pediatric Left Ventricular Noncompaction
    (American Heart Association, 2017-12) Miller, Erin M.; Hinton, Robert B.; Czosek, Richard; Lorts, Angela; Parrott, Ashley; Shikany, Amy R.; Ittenbach, Richard F.; Ware, Stephanie M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) can occur in isolation or can co-occur with a cardiomyopathy phenotype or cardiovascular malformation. The yield of cardiomyopathy gene panel testing in infants, children, and adolescents with a diagnosis of LVNC is unknown. By characterizing a pediatric population with LVNC, we sought to determine the yield of cardiomyopathy gene panel testing, distinguish the yield of testing for LVNC with or without co-occurring cardiac findings, and define additional factors influencing genetic testing yield. Methods and results: One hundred twenty-eight individuals diagnosed with LVNC at ≤21 years of age were identified, including 59% with idiopathic pathogenesis, 32% with familial disease, and 9% with a syndromic or metabolic diagnosis. Overall, 75 individuals had either cardiomyopathy gene panel (n=65) or known variant testing (n=10). The yield of cardiomyopathy gene panel testing was 9%. The severity of LVNC by imaging criteria was not associated with positive genetic testing, co-occurring cardiac features, pathogenesis, family history, or myocardial dysfunction. Individuals with isolated LVNC were significantly less likely to have a positive genetic testing result compared with those with LVNC and co-occurring cardiomyopathy (0% versus 12%, respectively; P<0.01). Conclusions: Genetic testing should be considered in individuals with cardiomyopathy co-occurring with LVNC. These data do not suggest an indication for cardiomyopathy gene panel testing in individuals with isolated LVNC in the absence of a family history of cardiomyopathy.