Browsing by Author "Sharon, Elad"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Cohort 36 of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART, SWOG S1609)
    (American Association for Cancer Research, 2022) Adams, Sylvia; Othus, Megan; Patel, Sandip Pravin; Miller, Kathy D.; Chugh, Rashmi; Schuetze, Scott M.; Chamberlin, Mary D.; Haley, Barbara J.; Storniolo, Anna Maria V.; Reddy, Mridula P.; Anderson, Scott A.; Zimmerman, Collin T.; O'Dea, Anne P.; Mirshahidi, Hamid R.; Ahnert, Jordi Rodon; Brescia, Frank J.; Hahn, Olwen; Raymond, Jane M.; Biggs, David D.; Connolly, Roisin M.; Sharon, Elad; Korde, Larissa A.; Gray, Robert J.; Mayerson, Edward; Plets, Melissa; Blanke, Charles D.; Chae, Young Kwang; Kurzrock, Razelle; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare aggressive subtype that responds poorly to cytotoxics. Median survival is approximately 8 months for metastatic disease. We report results for advanced MpBC treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab, a cohort of S1609 for rare cancers (DART: NCT02834013). Patients and methods: Prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II (two-stage) trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg i.v. every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg i.v. every 2 weeks) for advanced MpBC. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Overall, 17 evaluable patients enrolled. Median age was 60 years (26-85); median number of prior therapy lines was 2 (0-5). ORR was 18%; 3 of 17 patients achieved objective responses (1 complete, 2 partial responses; 2 spindle cell, 1 chondromyxoid histology), which are ongoing at 28+, 33+, and 34+ months, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 12 months, respectively. Altogether, 11 patients (65%) experienced adverse events (AE), including one grade 5 AE. Eight patients (47%) developed an immune-related AE (irAE), with adrenal insufficiency observed in all 3 responders. Responses occurred in tumors with low tumor mutational burden, low PD-L1, and absent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination showed no new safety signals and met its primary endpoint with 18% ORR in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory MpBC. All responses are ongoing at >2 to almost 3 years later. The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab was associated with exceptional responses in a subset of patients versus no activity. This combination warrants further investigation in MpBC, with special attention to understanding mechanism of action, and carefully designed to weigh against the significant risks of irAEs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase 1 Results of a Multicenter Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial
    (Elsevier, 2020-09) Diefenbach, Catherine S.; Hong, Fangxin; Ambinder, Richard F.; Cohen, Jonathon B.; Robertson, Michael J.; David, Kevin A.; Advani, Ranjana H.; Fenske, Timothy S.; Barta, Stefan K.; Palmisiano, Neil D.; Svoboda, Jakub; Morgan, David S.; Karmali, Reem; Sharon, Elad; Streicher, Howard; Kahl, Brad S.; Ansell, Stephen M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Recognising that the immune suppressive microenvironment promotes tumour growth in Hodgkin lymphoma, we hypothesised that activating immunity might augment the activity of targeted chemotherapy. We evaluated the safety and activity of combinations of brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab or ipilimumab, or both in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma aged 18 years or older who had relapsed after at least one line of therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, and adequate organ and marrow function, with no pulmonary dysfunction were eligible for inclusion. Phase 1 primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities of brentuximab vedotin combined with ipilimumab (ipilimumab group), nivolumab (nivolumab group), or both (triplet therapy group) using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with expansion cohorts. During the dose escalation phase, patients were enrolled sequentially into one of six cohorts: in the ipilimumab group fixed brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (cohort A) or 3 mg/kg (cohort B); in the nivolumab group fixed nivolumab 3 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1·2 mg/kg (cohort D) or 1·8 mg/kg (cohort E); and in the triplet therapy group fixed nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1·2 mg/kg (cohort G) or 1·8 mg/kg (cohort H). Additional patients were enrolled in the expansion phase at the same doses of cohorts B, E, and H. All drugs were given intravenously; brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab were given every 3 weeks, ipilimumab was given every 6 weeks in the ipilimumab group and every 12 weeks in the triplet therapy group. All eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. This phase 1/2 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01896999. The phase 2, randomised portion of the trial is still enrolling. Findings: Between March 7, 2014, and Dec 28, 2017, 64 patients were enrolled; two patients in the ipilimumab group and one patient in the nivolumab group were excluded due to ineligibility after enrolment and 61 were evaluable. A total of six dose limiting toxicities were reported in four patients, and the doses used in cohorts B, E, and H were established as maximum tolerated doses and patients were subsequently enrolled onto expansion cohorts (C, F, and I) with these schedules. There were ten (43%) grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events in the ipilimumab group, three (16%) in the nivolumab group, and 11 (50%) in the triplet therapy group including: eight (13%) of 64 patients reporting rash, and colitis, gastritis, pancreatitis and arthritis, and diabetic ketoacidosis each occurring in one (2%) patient. There were two (3%) treatment related deaths, one in the nivolumab group and one in the triplet therapy group. The overall response rate was 76% (95% CI 53-92) in the ipilimumab group, 89% (65-99) in the nivolumab group, and 82% (60-95) in the triplet therapy group, and the complete response rate was 57% (95% CI 34-78%) in the ipilimumab group, 61% (36-83%) in the nivolumab group, and 73% (50-89%) in the triplet therapy group. With a median follow-up of 2·6 years (IQR 1·8-2·9) in the ipilimumab group, 2·4 years (2·2-2·6) in the nivolumab group, and 1·7 years (1·6-1·9) in the triplet therapy group, median progression-free survival is 1·2 years (95% CI 1·7-not reached) in the ipilimumab group, but was not reached in the other two treatment groups. Median overall survival has not been reached in any of the groups. Interpretation: There are clear differences in activity and toxicity of the three combination regimens. The tolerability and preliminary activity for the two most active regimens, brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab and the triplet therapy, are being compared in a randomised phase 2 trial (NCT01896999).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Safety and Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV and Cancer: A Real-World Report From the Cancer Therapy Using Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV-International (CATCH-IT) Consortium
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023) El Zarif, Talal; Nassar, Amin H.; Adib, Elio; Fitzgerald, Bailey G.; Huang, Jiaming; Mouhieddine, Tarek H.; Rubinstein, Paul G.; Nonato, Taylor; McKay, Rana R.; Li, Mingjia; Mittra, Arjun; Owen, Dwight H.; Baiocchi, Robert A.; Lorentsen, Michael; Dittus, Christopher; Dizman, Nazli; Falohun, Adewunmi; Abdel-Wahab, Noha; Diab, Adi; Bankapur, Anand; Reed, Alexandra; Kim, Chul; Arora, Aakriti; Shah, Neil J.; El-Am, Edward; Kozaily, Elie; Abdallah, Wassim; Al-Hader, Ahmad; Ghazal, Batool Abu; Saeed, Anwaar; Drolen, Claire; Lechner, Melissa G.; Drakaki, Alexandra; Baena, Javier; Nebhan, Caroline A.; Haykal, Tarek; Morse, Michael A.; Cortellini, Alessio; Pinato, David J.; Pria, Alessia Dalla; Hall, Evan; Bakalov, Veli; Bahary, Nathan; Rajkumar, Aarthi; Mangla, Ankit; Shah, Vishal; Singh, Parminder; Nana, Frank Aboubakar; Lopetegui-Lia, Nerea; Dima, Danai; Dobbs, Ryan W.; Funchain, Pauline; Saleem, Rabia; Woodford, Rachel; Long, Georgina V.; Menzies, Alexander M.; Genova, Carlo; Barletta, Giulia; Puri, Sonam; Florou, Vaia; Idossa, Dame; Saponara, Maristella; Queirolo, Paola; Lamberti, Giuseppe; Addeo, Alfredo; Bersanelli, Melissa; Freeman, Dory; Xie, Wanling; Reid, Erin G.; Chiao, Elizabeth Y.; Sharon, Elad; Johnson, Douglas B.; Ramaswami, Ramya; Bower, Mark; Emu, Brinda; Marron, Thomas U.; Choueiri, Toni K.; Baden, Lindsey R.; Lurain, Kathryn; Sonpavde, Guru P.; Naqash, Abdul Rafeh; Graduate Medical Education, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Compared with people living without HIV (PWOH), people living with HIV (PWH) and cancer have traditionally been excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. Furthermore, there is a paucity of real-world data on the use of ICIs in PWH and cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included PWH treated with anti-PD-1- or anti-PD-L1-based therapies for advanced cancers. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rates (ORRs) were measured per RECIST 1.1 or other tumor-specific criteria, whenever feasible. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare OS and PFS between matched PWH and PWOH with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Results: Among 390 PWH, median age was 58 years, 85% (n = 331) were males, 36% (n = 138) were Black; 70% (n = 274) received anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Most common cancers were NSCLC (28%, n = 111), hepatocellular carcinoma ([HCC]; 11%, n = 44), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; 10%, n = 39). Seventy percent (152/216) had CD4+ T cell counts ≥200 cells/µL, and 94% (179/190) had HIV viral load <400 copies/mL. Twenty percent (79/390) had any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and 7.7% (30/390) had grade ≥3 irAEs. ORRs were 69% (nonmelanoma skin cancer), 31% (NSCLC), 16% (HCC), and 11% (HNSCC). In the matched mNSCLC cohort (61 PWH v 110 PWOH), 20% (12/61) PWH and 22% (24/110) PWOH had irAEs. Adjusted 42-month RMST difference was -0.06 months (95% CI, -5.49 to 5.37; P = .98) for PFS and 2.23 months (95% CI, -4.02 to 8.48; P = .48) for OS. Conclusion: Among PWH, ICIs demonstrated differential activity across cancer types with no excess toxicity. Safety and activity of ICIs were similar between matched cohorts of PWH and PWOH with mNSCLC.