- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Seña, Arlene C."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item 2889. One vs Three Weekly Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G for Treatment of Early Syphilis in Persons with and without HIV: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)(Oxford University Press, 2023-11-27) Hook, Edward W.; Workowski, Kimberly; Dionne, Jodie A.; McNeil, Candice J.; Taylor, Stephanie N.; Batteiger, Teresa; Dombrowski, Julia C.; Mayer, Kenneth H.; Seña, Arlene C.; Wiesenfeld, Harold C.; Perlowski, Charlotte; Newman, Lori; Zhu, Chunming; Mejia-Galvis, Jorge E.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Syphilis rates in the United Stated (U.S.) have increased steadily for over a decade. Despite over 75 years as the drug of choice for syphilis treatment, controversy persists on optimal duration of therapy with benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for persons with early(primary, secondary, and early latent) syphilis, particularly for persons co-infected with HIV. Given the ongoing national shortages of BPG, optimizing duration of therapy is an urgent concern. Methods: We conducted a multicenter RCT comparing a single intramuscular (IM) injection of BPG, 2.4 million units to BPG administered for three successive weeks for treatment of early syphilis in persons with and without HIV. The primary outcome of the study was a > 4-fold decline in RPR titer measured at 6 months. Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol analyses were performed and were similar. ITT analyses are presented here. Results: A total of 249 persons with early syphilis were enrolled at 10 participating sites. Most (97%) participants were were categorized as male sex, black race (62%), and 153 (64%) were living with HIV. The syphilis stage distribution was 19% primary, 47% secondary, and 33% early latent and did not differ significantly by HIV status. Serologic response (> 4-fold decline in RPR titer) at 6 months was 76% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.68-0.82) in the single dose group and did not differ significantly from the three-dose group (70%, 95% CI 0.61-0.77). There were no treatment failures (> 4-fold increase in RPR titer). Among persons with and without HIV there was no significant difference in RPR response at 6 months: 76% in the single-dose group vs. 71% in the 3-dose group (95% CI 0.05-0.17). Most participants experienced mild to moderate local injection site pain and tenderness. Conclusion: Treatment of persons with early syphilis with more than a single dose of 2.4 million units of BPG offers no therapeutic benefit irrespective of HIV infection status and was associated with increased rates of injection site discomfort.Item Single-Dose Zoliflodacin (ETX0914) for Treatment of Urogenital Gonorrhea(Massachusetts Medical Society, 2018-11) Taylor, Stephanie N.; Marrazzo, Jeanne; Batteiger, Byron E.; Hook, Edward W., III; Seña, Arlene C.; Long, Jill; Wierzbicki, Michael R.; Kwak, Hannah; Johnson, Shacondra M.; Lawrence, Kenneth; Mueller, John; Medicine, School of MedicineBACKGROUND Antibiotic-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has prompted the development of new therapies. Zoliflodacin is a new antibiotic that inhibits DNA biosynthesis. In this multicenter, phase 2 trial, zoliflodacin was evaluated for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. METHODS We randomly assigned eligible men and women who had signs or symptoms of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea or untreated urogenital gonorrhea or who had had sexual contact in the preceding 14 days with a person who had gonorrhea to receive a single oral dose of zoliflodacin (2 g or 3 g) or a single 500-mg intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone in a ratio of approximately 70:70:40. A test of cure occurred within 6±2 days after treatment, followed by a safety visit 31±2 days after treatment. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the proportion of urogenital microbiologic cure in the microbiologic intention-to-treat (micro-ITT) population. RESULTS From November 2014 through December 2015, a total of 179 participants (167 men and 12 women) were enrolled. Among the 141 participants in the micro-ITT population who could be evaluated, microbiologic cure at urogenital sites was documented in 55 of 57 (96%) who received 2 g of zoliflodacin, 54 of 56 (96%) who received 3 g of zoliflodacin, and 28 of 28 (100%) who received ceftriaxone. All rectal infections were cured in all 5 participants who received 2 g of zoliflodacin and all 7 who received 3 g, and in all 3 participants in the group that received ceftriaxone. Pharyngeal infections were cured in 4 of 8 participants (50%), 9 of 11 participants (82%), and 4 of 4 participants (100%) in the groups that received 2 g of zoliflodacin, 3 g of zoliflodacin, and ceftriaxone, respectively. A total of 84 adverse events were reported: 24 in the group that received 2 g of zoliflodacin, 37 in the group that received 3 g of zoliflodacin, and 23 in the group that received ceftriaxone. According to investigators, a total of 21 adverse events were thought to be related to zoliflodacin, and most such events were gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS The majority of uncomplicated urogenital and rectal gonococcal infections were successfully treated with oral zoliflodacin, but this agent was less efficacious in the treatment of pharyngeal infections.Item Summary of the Fourth Annual American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association Workshop on Improving Sexually Transmitted Infection Control Efforts Through Cross-Sector Collaboration(Wolters Kluwer, 2022-08) Van Gerwen, Olivia; Griner, Stacey; Davis, Alissa; Footman, Alison; Pinto, Casey N.; Melendez, Johan H.; Tuddenham, Susan; Exten, Cara; Soge, Olusegun O.; Chakraborty, Payal; Nenninger, Ashley; Marlowe, Elizabeth M.; Joseph, Ajith M.; McGowin, Chris L.; Seña, Arlene C.; Fortenberry , J. Dennis; Ghanem, Khalil G.; Van Der Pol , Barbara; Pediatrics, School of MedicineThe American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association has, for several years, been conducting a cross-sector workshop to bring together a variety of stakeholders to develop ideas for collaboratively improving the sexually transmitted infection control efforts in the United States. In this summary, we share the content of discussions and ideas of the fourth annual workshop for future research and potential changes to practice with a focus on diagnostic capacity.