Browsing by Author "Sciubba, Daniel M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indocyanine Green as a Marker for Tissue Ischemia in Spinal Tumor Resections and Extended Revisions: A Technical Note
    (MDPI, 2025-01-30) Ward, Max; Schneider, Daniel; Brown, Ethan D. L.; Maity, Apratim; Obeng-Gyasi, Barnabas; Ber, Roee; Elsamadicy, Aladine A.; Sciubba, Daniel M.; Knobel, Denis; Lo, Sheng-Fu Larry; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background/Objectives: The increasing complexity of spinal oncology procedures, particularly in en-bloc tumor resections, creates challenges in tissue perfusion assessment due to extended operative times and extensive surgical dissection. Real-time visualization of tissue perfusion can be achieved with ICG using commercially available handheld imaging systems, offering potential advantages in spinal oncology cases. This study assessed the utility of ICG in analyzing soft-tissue viability during complex spine procedures extending beyond 7.5 h, with a particular focus on oncologic resections. Methods: Three cases that required over 7.5 h of operative time were chosen for ICG utilization. These cases included an en-bloc malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor resection, an en-bloc resection of a malignant epithelioid neoplasm, and a long-segment fusion revision for pseudoarthrosis. At the conclusion of the critical portion of the procedure, a handheld intraoperative fluorescence camera was utilized to visualize the tissue penetration of intravenous ICG. Results: Prior to injecting ICG, devascularized tissue was not clearly visible. Injecting ICG allowed clear separation of vascularized (fluorescing) and devascularized (non-fluorescing) tissues. One region of non-florescent tissue was later confirmed to be devascularized with MRI and experienced postoperative infection. Conclusions: As the complexity of spinal oncology procedures increases, ICG fluorescence imaging offers a novel method for real-time assessment of tissue perfusion. This technique may be particularly valuable in extensive tumor resections, post-radiation cases, and revision surgeries where tissue viability is at risk. Further investigation in the spinal oncology population could help establish whether early identification of poorly perfused tissues impacts wound healing outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    VIBe Scale: Validation of the Intraoperative Bleeding Severity Scale by Spine Surgeons
    (International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS), 2022) Sciubba, Daniel M.; Khanna, Nitin; Pennington, Zach; Singh, Rahul K.; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: The Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Scale (VIBe Scale) was initially validated with surgeons who operate on cardiothoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities and fulfilled criteria for a clinician-reported scale. However, there is a need for a tool to aid in intraoperative blood management during spine surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to establish the reliability and consistency of the VIBe Scale as a tool for spine surgeons to assess intraoperative bleeding. Methods: Orthopedic (n = 16) and neurological (n = 9) spine surgeons scored videos depicting surgical bleeding and assessed the VIBe Scale's relevance and clarity. Inter- and intraobserver agreement (Kendall's W) were calculated for all surgeons and pooled with responses from the original study to establish agreement across specialties. Results: All of the spine surgeons indicated that the scale was clinically relevant for evaluating hemostasis and could be implemented in a clinical study. Twenty-two spine surgeons (88%) reported that the scale represents the range of bleeding site sizes and severities expected in their practice. Twenty-four spine surgeons (96%) indicated that the scale would be useful in communicating bleeding severity with other members of the surgical team. Interobserver agreement was acceptable (0.79) for orthopedic specialists, appreciable (0.88) for neurological specialists, and appreciable (0.88) for the combined specialists. Intraobserver agreement was excellent for orthopedic (0.91) and neurological (0.91) spine surgeons and excellent (0.96) for the combined specialists. Conclusions: The results highlight the reliability of the VIBe Scale and potential utility for quantifying intraoperative blood loss in spine surgery. Clinical relevance: The VIBe Scale may be useful for evaluating the efficacy of untested intraoperative hemostatic agents and for comparing the relative efficacy of 2 or more analogous agents. It may also prove useful for intraoperative staff by quantifying ongoing intraoperative blood loss and correlating losses with the potential transfusion and intraoperative hemostatic agent requirements.