Browsing by Author "Schmidt, Julianne D."
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Age at First Concussion Influences Number of Subsequent Concussions(Elsevier, 2018) Schmidt, Julianne D.; Rizzone, Katherine; Hoffman, Nicole L.; Weber, Michelle L.; Jones, Courtney; Bazarian, Jeff; Broglio, Steven P.; McCrea, Michael; McAllister, Thomas W.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineBackground: Individuals that sustain their first concussion during childhood may be at greater risk for sustaining multiple concussions throughout their lifetime, due to a longer window of vulnerability. Purpose: To estimate the association between age at first concussion with number of subsequent concussions. Methods: A total of 23,582 collegiate athletes from 26 universities and military cadets from three military academies completed a concussion history questionnaire (65% males, age: 19.9±1.4years). Participants self-reported concussions and age at time of each injury. Participants with a history of concussion (n=3,647, 15.5%) were categorized as having sustained their first concussion during childhood (<10 years old - yo) or adolescence (≥10yo & ≤18yo). Poisson regression was used to model age group (childhood, adolescence) predicting number of subsequent concussions (0, 1, 2+). A second Poisson regression was developed to determine whether age at first concussion predicted number of subsequent concussions. Results: Participants self-reporting their first concussion during childhood had an increased risk of sustaining subsequent concussions (RR=2.19, 95% CI: 1.82, 2.64) compared to participants self-reporting their first concussion during adolescence. For every one-year increase in age at first concussion, we observed a 16% reduction in the risk of subsequent concussion (RR=0.84, 95% CI:0.82,0.86). Conclusion(s): Individuals self-reporting a concussion at a young age sustained a higher number of concussions prior to the age of 18. Concussion prevention, recognition, and reporting strategies are of particular need at the youth level.Item Age of First Concussion and Cognitive, Psychological, and Physical Outcomes in NCAA Collegiate Student Athletes(Springer, 2022-11) Moody, Jena N.; Hayes, Jasmeet P.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Broglio, Steven P.; McAllister, Thomas W.; McCrea, Michael; Pasquina, Paul F.; Caccese, Jaclyn B.; CARE Consortium Investigators; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjective: Concussions are common among youth athletes and could disrupt critical neurodevelopment. This study examined the association between age of first concussion (AFC) and neurocognitive performance, psychological distress, postural stability, and symptoms commonly associated with concussion in healthy collegiate men and women student athletes. Methods: Participants included 4267 collegiate athletes from various contact, limited-contact, and non-contact sports (1818 women and 2449 men) who completed baseline assessments as part of the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Psychological distress was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory 18; neurocognitive performance was assessed with the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT); symptoms commonly associated with concussion were assessed with the ImPACT Post-Concussion Symptom Scale; postural stability was assessed with the Balance Error Scoring System. Generalized linear models were used to examine the effects of AFC on clinical outcomes separately in men and women. Results: Later AFC was associated with lower global (Exp(B) = 0.96, P = 0.001) and somatic (Exp(B) = 0.96, P = 0.002) psychological distress on the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 and faster ImPACT reaction time (B = - 0.003, P = 0.001) in women. AFC was not associated with any clinical outcomes in men. Conclusion: Younger AFC was associated with some differences in psychological distress and reaction time among women but not men; however, these results are likely not clinically meaningful. Sociodemographic disparities, pre-existing conditions, and sport type may impact clinical and cognitive outcomes in collegiate athletes more than concussion history. Future work should examine the relationship between AFC and lifespan-related outcomes.Item Age of First Concussion and Cognitive, Psychological, and Physical Outcomes in NCAA Collegiate Student Athletes(Springer, 2022) Moody, Jena N.; Hayes, Jasmeet P.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Broglio, Steven P.; McAllister, Thomas W.; McCrea, Michael; Pasquina, Paul F.; Caccese, Jaclyn B.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjective: Concussions are common among youth athletes and could disrupt critical neurodevelopment. This study examined the association between age of first concussion (AFC) and neurocognitive performance, psychological distress, postural stability, and symptoms commonly associated with concussion in healthy collegiate men and women student athletes. Methods: Participants included 4267 collegiate athletes from various contact, limited-contact, and non-contact sports (1818 women and 2449 men) who completed baseline assessments as part of the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Psychological distress was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory 18; neurocognitive performance was assessed with the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT); symptoms commonly associated with concussion were assessed with the ImPACT Post-Concussion Symptom Scale; postural stability was assessed with the Balance Error Scoring System. Generalized linear models were used to examine the effects of AFC on clinical outcomes separately in men and women. Results: Later AFC was associated with lower global (Exp(B) = 0.96, P = 0.001) and somatic (Exp(B) = 0.96, P = 0.002) psychological distress on the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 and faster ImPACT reaction time (B = - 0.003, P = 0.001) in women. AFC was not associated with any clinical outcomes in men. Conclusion: Younger AFC was associated with some differences in psychological distress and reaction time among women but not men; however, these results are likely not clinically meaningful. Sociodemographic disparities, pre-existing conditions, and sport type may impact clinical and cognitive outcomes in collegiate athletes more than concussion history. Future work should examine the relationship between AFC and lifespan-related outcomes.Item Bifactor Model of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Checklist: Replication and Invariance Across Time in the CARE Consortium Sample(Sage, 2020-09) Brett, Benjamin L.; Kramer, Mark D.; McCrea, Michael A.; Broglio, Steven P.; McAllister, Thomas; Nelson, Lindsay D.; Hazzard, Joseph B., Jr.; Kelly, Louise A.; Ortega, Justus; Port, Nicholas; Pasquina, Paul F.; Jackson, Jonathan; Cameron, Kenneth L.; Houston, Megan N.; Goldman, Joshua T.; Giza, Christopher; Buckley, Thomas; Clugston, James R.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Feigenbaum, Luis A.; Eckner, James T.; Master, Christina L.; Collins, Michael W.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Chrisman, Sara P.D.; Duma, Stefan M.; Miles, Christopher M.; Susmarski, Adam; Psychiatry, School of MedicineBackground: Identifying separate dimensions of concussion symptoms may inform a precision medicine approach to treatment. It was previously reported that a bifactor model identified distinct acute postconcussion symptom dimensions. Purpose: To replicate previous findings of a bifactor structure of concussion symptoms in the Concussion Assessment Research and Education (CARE) Consortium sample, examine measurement invariance from pre- to postinjury, and evaluate whether factors are associated with other clinical and biomarker measures. Study design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Collegiate athletes were prospectively evaluated using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT-3) during preseason (N = 31,557); 2789 were followed at <6 hours and 24 to 48 hours after concussion. Item-level SCAT-3 ratings were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Bifactor and higher-order models were compared for their fit and interpretability. Measurement invariance tested the stability of the identified factor structure across time. The association between factors and criterion measures (clinical and blood-based markers of concussion severity, symptom duration) was evaluated. Results: The optimal structure for each time point was a 7-factor bifactor model: a General factor, on which all items loaded, and 6 specific factors-Vestibulo-ocular, Headache, Sensory, Fatigue, Cognitive, and Emotional. The model manifested strict invariance across the 2 postinjury time points but only configural invariance from baseline to postinjury. From <6 to 24-48 hours, some dimensions increased in severity (Sensory, Fatigue, Emotional), while others decreased (General, Headache, Vestibulo-ocular). The factors correlated with differing clinical and biomarker criterion measures and showed differing patterns of association with symptom duration at different time points. Conclusion: Bifactor modeling supported the predominant unidimensionality of concussion symptoms while revealing multidimensional properties, including a large dominant General factor and 6 independent factors: Headache, Vestibulo-ocular, Sensory, Cognitive, Fatigue, and Emotional. Unlike the widely used SCAT-3 symptom severity score, which declines gradually after injury, the bifactor model revealed separable symptom dimensions that have distinct trajectories in the acute postinjury period and different patterns of association with other markers of injury severity and outcome. Clinical relevance: The SCAT-3 total score remains a valuable, robust index of overall concussion symptom severity, and the specific factors identified may inform management strategies. Because some symptom dimensions continue to worsen in the first 24 to 48 hours after injury (ie, Sensory, Fatigue, Emotional), routine follow-up in this time frame may be valuable to ensure that symptoms are managed effectively.Item Estimated age of first exposure to American football and outcome from concussion(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-11-24) Caccese, Jaclyn B.; Houck, Zac; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Clugston, James R.; Iverson, Grant L.; Bryk, Kelsey N.; Oldham, Jessie R.; Pasquina, Paul F.; Broglio, Steven P.; McAllister, Thomas W.; McCrea, Michael; Reed Hoy, April Marie; Hazzard, Joseph B., Jr.; Kelly, Louise A.; Ortega, Justus D.; Port, Nicholas; Putukian, Margot; Langford, T. Dianne; Giza, Christopher C.; Goldman, Joshua T.; Benjamin, Holly J.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Feigenbaum, Luis A.; Eckner, James T.; Mihalik, Jason P.; Dysart Miles, Jessica; Anderson, Scott; Master, Christina L.; Collins, Micky W.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Chrisman, Sara P.D.; Brooks, Alison; Jackson, Jonathan C.; McGinty, Gerald; Cameron, Kenneth L.; Susmarski, Adam; O'Donnell, Patrick G.; Duma, Stefan; Rowson, Steve; Miles, Christopher M.; Bullers, Christopher T.; Dykhuizen, Brian H.; Lintner, Laura; Buckley, Thomas A.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjective: To examine the association between estimated age at first exposure (eAFE) to American football and clinical measures throughout recovery following concussion. Methods: Participants were recruited across 30 colleges and universities as part of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium. There were 294 NCAA American football players (age 19 ± 1 years) evaluated 24-48 hours following concussion with valid baseline data and 327 (age 19 ± 1 years) evaluated at the time they were asymptomatic with valid baseline data. Participants sustained a medically diagnosed concussion between baseline testing and postconcussion assessments. Outcome measures included the number of days until asymptomatic, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) composite scores, Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) total score, and Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) subscores. The eAFE was defined as participant's age at the time of assessment minus self-reported number of years playing football. Results: In unadjusted regression models, younger eAFE was associated with lower (worse) ImPACT Visual Motor Speed (R 2 = 0.031, p = 0.012) at 24-48 hours following injury and lower (better) BSI-18 Somatization subscores (R 2 = 0.014, p = 0.038) when the athletes were asymptomatic. The effect sizes were very small. The eAFE was not associated with the number of days until asymptomatic, other ImPACT composite scores, BESS total score, or other BSI-18 subscores. Conclusion: Earlier eAFE to American football was not associated with longer symptom recovery, worse balance, worse cognitive performance, or greater psychological distress following concussion. In these NCAA football players, longer duration of exposure to football during childhood and adolescence appears to be unrelated to clinical recovery following concussion.Item King-Devick Sensitivity and Specificity to Concussion in Collegiate Athletes(Allen Press, 2023) Le, Rachel Khinh; Ortega, Justus; Chrisman, Sara P.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Meyer, Briana P.; Clugston, James R.; Goldman, Joshua T.; McAllister, Thomas; McCrea, Michael; Broglio, Steven P.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineContext: The King-Devick (K-D) test is used to identify oculomotor impairment after concussion. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the K-D test over time has not been evaluated. Objectives: To (1) examine the sensitivity and specificity of the K-D test at 0 to 6 hours postinjury, 24 to 48 hours postinjury, the beginning of a return-to-play (RTP) protocol (asymptomatic), unrestricted RTP, and 6 months postconcussion and (2) compare outcomes between athletes with and those without concussion across confounding factors (sex, age, sport contact level, academic year, learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, migraine history, concussion history, and test administration mode). Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional design. Setting: Multiple institutions in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium. Patients or other participants: A total of 320 athletes with a concussion (162 men, 158 women; age = 19.80 ± 1.41 years) were compared with 1239 total collegiate athletes without a concussion (646 men, 593 women; age = 20.31 ± 1.18 years). Main outcome measure(s): We calculated the K-D test time difference (in seconds) by subtracting the baseline from the most recent time. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy across time points. We identified cutoff scores and corresponding specificity at both the 80% and 70% sensitivity levels. We repeated ROC with AUC analyses using confounding factors. Results: The K-D test predicted positive results at the 0- to 6-hour (AUC = 0.724, P < .001), 24- to 48-hour (AUC = 0.701, P < .001), RTP (AUC = 0.640, P < .001), and 6-month postconcussion (AUC = 0.615, P < .001) tim points but not at the asymptomatic time point (AUC = 0.513, P = .497). The 0- to 6-hour and 24- to 48-hour time points yielded 80% sensitivity cutoff scores of -2.6 and -3.2 seconds (ie, faster), respectively, but 46% and 41% specificity, respectively. The K-D test had a better AUC when administered using an iPad (AUC = 0.800, 95% CI = 0.747, 0.854) compared with the spiral-bound card system (AUC = 0.646, 95% CI = 0.600, 0.692; P < .001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of the K-D test was greatest at 0 to 6 hours and 24 to 48 hours postconcussion but declined across subsequent postconcussion time points. The AUCs did not differentiate between groups across confounding factors. Our negative cutoff scores indicated that practice effects contributed to improved performance, requiring athletes to outperform their baseline scores.Item King-Devick testing and concussion recovery time in collegiate athletes(Elsevier, 2022) Whelan, Bridget M.; Gause, Emma L.; Ortega, Justus D.; Mills, Brianna M.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Breedlove, Katherine M.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Clugston, James R.; Goldman, Joshua T.; Harmon, Kimberly G.; McCrea, Michael A.; McAllister, Thomas W.; Broglio, Steven P.; Chrisman, Sara P. D.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjectives: To assess whether the King-Devick (KD) test is useful as a prognostic test for prolonged concussion symptoms by examining the relationship between a) change in performance on KD test from baseline to within two days post-injury and b) the absolute KD time at post-concussion testing, with an outcome of time to return to play (RTP). Design: Prospective Cohort Study. Methods: Collegiate varsity athletes in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium completed baseline and post-injury King-Devick tests from 2014 to 2018. Two exposures were evaluated: 1) change in KD score from baseline to within two days post-injury and 2) absolute KD score within two days post-injury, adjusted for baseline KD. We used Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the relationships between these exposures and time to RTP post-concussion. Results: A total of 309 concussion injuries were included. Median baseline KD score was 40.0 s (IQR: 35.8, 45.2). Median post-injury KD score was 45.8 s (IQR: 39.8, 57.1). Median number of days until RTP in this cohort was 11 (IQR: 8, 17). Post-injury KD score adjusted for baseline KD had a stronger association with time to RTP duration (HR: 0.99 (0.98, 1.00), p = 0.03) than the difference in KD score from baseline to post-injury (HR: 0.99 (0.99, 1.00), p = 0.07). Conclusions: Higher post-injury KD scores are associated with longer RTP. The association between KD post-concussion test and longer RTP warrants further investigation to assess the utility of the KD for prognostication in a clinical setting.Item Relationship Between the King-Devick Test and Commonly Used Concussion Tests at Baseline(Allen Press, 2019-12) Clugston, James R.; Houck, Zachary M.; Asken, Breton M.; Boone, Jonathan K.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Chrisman, Sara P.D.; Hoffman, Nicole L.; Harmon, Kimberly G.; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Collins, Michael W.; McAllister, Thomas W.; McCrea, Michael A.; Broglio, Steven P.; Ortega, Justus D.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineContext: Comprehensive assessments are recommended to evaluate sport-related concussion (SRC). The degree to which the King-Devick (KD) test adds novel information to an SRC evaluation is unknown. Objective: To describe relationships at baseline among the KD and other SRC assessments and explore whether the KD provides unique information to a multimodal baseline concussion assessment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Five National Collegiate Athletic Association institutions participating in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Patients or other participants: National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (N = 2258, age = 20 ± 1.5 years, 53.0% male, 68.9% white) in 11 men's and 13 women's sports. Main outcome measure(s): Participants completed baseline assessments on the KD and (1) the Symptom Inventory of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3rd edition, (2) the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, (3) the Balance Error Scoring System, (4) the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), (5) the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test battery, and (6) the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening tool during their first year in CARE. Correlation coefficients between the KD and the 6 other concussion assessments in isolation were determined. Assessments with ρ magnitude >0.1 were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis to evaluate their relative association with the KD. Results: Scores for SAC concentration, ImPACT visual motor speed, and ImPACT reaction time were correlated with the KD (ρ = -0.216, -0.276, and 0.164, respectively) and were thus included in the regression model, which explained 16.8% of the variance in baseline KD time (P < .001, Cohen f2 = 0.20). Better SAC concentration score (β = -.174, P < .001), ImPACT visual motor speed (β = -.205, P < .001), and ImPACT reaction time (β = .056, P = .020) were associated with faster baseline KD performance, but the effect sizes were small. Conclusions: Better performance on cognitive measures involving concentration, visual motor speed, and reaction time was weakly associated with better baseline KD performance. Symptoms, psychological distress, balance, and vestibular-oculomotor provocation were unrelated to KD performance at baseline. The findings indicate limited overlap at baseline among the CARE SRC assessments and the KD.