ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Schiff, Eugene"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of HCV Infection in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease
    (Elsevier, 2015-09) Charlton, Michael; Everson, Gregory T.; Flamm, Steven L.; Kumar, Princy; Landis, Charles; Brown, Robert S., Jr.; Fried, Michael W.; Terrault, Norah A.; O'Leary, Jacqueline G.; Vargas, Hugo E.; Kuo, Alexander; Schiff, Eugene; Sulkowski, Mark S.; Gilroy, Richard; Watt, Kymberly D.; Brown, Kimberly; Kwo, Paul; Pungpapong, Surakit; Korenblat, Kevin M.; Muir, Andrew J.; Teperman, Lewis; Fontana, Robert J.; Denning, Jill; Arterburn, Sarah; Dvory-Sobol, Hadas; Brandt-Sarif, Theo; Pang, Phillip S.; McHutchison, John G.; Reddy, K. Rajender; Afdhal, Nezam; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background & Aims There are no effective and safe treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of patients who have advanced liver disease. Methods In this phase 2, open-label study, we assessed treatment with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir, the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, and ribavirin in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Cohort A enrolled patients with cirrhosis and moderate or severe hepatic impairment who had not undergone liver transplantation. Cohort B enrolled patients who had undergone liver transplantation: those without cirrhosis; those with cirrhosis and mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment; and those with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 12 or 24 weeks of a fixed-dose combination tablet containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, once daily, plus ribavirin. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Results We enrolled 337 patients, 332 (99%) with HCV genotype 1 infection and 5 (1%) with HCV genotype 4 infection. In cohort A (nontransplant), SVR12 was achieved by 86%–89% of patients. In cohort B (transplant recipients), SVR12 was achieved by 96%–98% of patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, by 85%−88% of patients with moderate hepatic impairment, by 60%–75% of patients with severe hepatic impairment, and by all 6 patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Response rates in the 12- and 24-week groups were similar. Thirteen patients (4%) discontinued the ledipasvir and sofosbuvir combination prematurely because of adverse events; 10 patients died, mainly from complications related to hepatic decompensation. Conclusion The combination of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for 12 weeks produced high rates of SVR12 in patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Randomised clinical trial: emricasan versus placebo significantly decreases ALT and caspase 3/7 activation in subjects with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
    (Wiley, 2019-01) Shiffman, Mitchell; Freilich, Bradley; Vuppalanchi, Raj; Watt, Kymberly; Chan, Jean L.; Spada, Al; Hagerty, David T.; Schiff, Eugene; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Lipotoxicity leading to excessive caspase‐mediated apoptosis and inflammation is believed to drive liver damage in NAFLD. Emricasan is a pan‐caspase inhibitor that decreased serum ALT and apoptotic and inflammatory markers in subjects with chronic hepatitis. Aims: To assess whether 28 days of emricasan would reduce elevated levels of serum ALT, AST, cleaved cytokeratin‐18, full‐length cytokeratin‐18, and caspase 3/7 in subjects with NAFLD and raised aminotransferases. Methods: Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, office‐practice study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of emricasan in subjects with NAFLD and ALT levels ≥1.5 x ULN during screening. Subjects were randomised to emricasan 25 mg twice daily or matching placebo. Subjects with cirrhosis and other causes for raised aminotransferases were excluded. The primary endpoint was the change in ALT at day 28 in the emricasan group vs placebo. Results: 38 subjects were randomised, 19 each to emricasan or placebo. Baseline disease factors were well balanced except for lower median ALT values in emricasan subjects. Three subjects randomised to placebo discontinued prior to day 28. ALT values decreased significantly in emricasan‐treated subjects vs placebo at days 7 (P < 0.0001) and 28 (P = 0.02). cCK18 (day 7), flCK18 (days 7 and 28), and caspase 3/7 (day 7) were also significantly decreased in emricasan‐treated subjects vs placebo. Emricasan treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: Emricasan decreased ALT and biomarkers in subjects with NAFLD and raised aminotransferases after 28 days. These results support the further development of emricasan in patients with NAFLD.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Saroglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ Agonist, for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Phase 2 Trial
    (Wiley, 2021-10) Gawrieh, Samer; Noureddin, Mazen; Loo, Nicole; Mohseni, Rizwana; Awasty, Vivek; Cusi, Kenneth; Kowdley, Kris V.; Lai, Michelle; Schiff, Eugene; Parmar, Deven; Patel, Pankaj; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and Aims Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by insulin resistance and dysregulated lipid and glucose metabolism. Saroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α/γ agonist, improves insulin sensitivity, and lipid and glycemic parameters. Saroglitazar improved nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) histology in animal studies. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in patients with NAFLD/NASH. Approach & Results A total of 106 patients with NAFLD/NASH with ALT ≥50 U/L at baseline and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo or saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in ALT levels at Week 16. Liver fat content (LFC) was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. The least squares (LS) mean (SE) percent change from baseline in ALT at Week 16 was -25.5% (5.8), -27.7% (5.9) and -45.8% (5.7) with saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg, respectively versus 3.4% (5.6) in placebo (p<0.001 for all). Compared to placebo, saroglitazar 4 mg improved LFC [4.1%, (5.9) versus -19.7% (5.6)], adiponectin [-0.3 ug/mL (0.3) versus 1.3 ug/mL (0.3)], homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance [-1.3 (1.8) versus -6.3 (1.7)], and triglycerides [-5.3 mg/dL (10.7) versus -68.7 mg/dL (10.3)] (p<0.05 for all). Saroglitazar 4 mg also improved lipoprotein particle composition and size and reduced lipotoxic lipid species. Saroglitazar was well-tolerated. A mean weight gain of 1.5kg was observed with saroglitazar 4 mg versus 0.3 kg with placebo (p>0.05). Conclusions Saroglitazar 4 mg significantly improved ALT, LFC, insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia in participants with NAFLD/NASH.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir (12 and 8 weeks) in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients without cirrhosis: OPTIMIST-1, a phase 3, randomized study
    (Wiley, 2016-08) Kwo, Paul; Gitlin, Norman; Nahass, Ronald; Bernstein, David; Etzkorn, Kyle; Rojter, Sergio; Schiff, Eugene; Davis, Mitchell; Ruane, Peter; Younes, Ziad; Kalmeijer, Ronald; Sinha, Rekha; Peeters, Monika; Lenz, Oliver; Fevery, Bart; De La Rosa, Guy; Scott, Jane; Witek, James; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Effective antiviral therapy is essential for achieving sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The phase 2 COSMOS study reported high SVR rates in treatment-naive and prior null-responder HCV genotype (GT) 1-infected patients receiving simeprevir+sofosbuvir±ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks. OPTIMIST-1 (NCT02114177) was a multicenter, randomized, open-label study assessing the efficacy and safety of 12 and 8 weeks of simeprevir+sofosbuvir in HCV GT1-infected treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients without cirrhosis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by HCV GT/subtype and presence or absence of NS3 Q80K polymorphism [GT1b, GT1a with Q80K, GT1a without Q80K]), prior HCV treatment history, and IL28B GT [CC, non-CC]) to simeprevir 150 mg once daily+sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 or 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR rate 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12). Superiority in SVR12 was assessed for simeprevir+sofosbuvir at 12 and 8 weeks versus a composite historical control SVR rate. Enrolled were 310 patients, who were randomized and received treatment (n = 155 in each arm). SVR12 with simeprevir+sofosbuvir for 12 weeks (97% [150/155; 95% confidence interval 94%-100%]) was superior to the historical control (87%). SVR12 with simeprevir+sofosbuvir for 8 weeks (83% [128/155; 95% confidence interval 76-89%]) was not superior to the historical control (83%). The most frequent adverse events were nausea, headache, and fatigue (12-week arm: 15% [23/155], 14% [22/155], and 12% [19/155]; 8-week arm: 9% [14/155], 17% [26/155], and 15% [23/155], respectively). No patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. One (1%, 12-week arm) and three (2%, 8-week arm) patients experienced a serious adverse event (all unrelated to study treatment). CONCLUSION: Simeprevir+sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is highly effective in the treatment of HCV GT1-infected patients without cirrhosis, including those with Q80K. (Hepatology 2016;64:370-380).
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University