Browsing by Author "Schatz, Desmond"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A genomic data archive from the Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes
    (Springer Nature, 2023-05-26) Perry, Daniel J.; Shapiro, Melanie R.; Chamberlain, Sonya W.; Kusmartseva, Irina; Chamala, Srikar; Balzano-Nogueira, Leandro; Yang, Mingder; Brant, Jason O.; Brusko, Maigan; Williams, MacKenzie D.; McGrail, Kieran M.; McNichols, James; Peters, Leeana D.; Posgai, Amanda L.; Kaddis, John S.; Mathews, Clayton E.; Wasserfall, Clive H.; Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M.; Campbell-Thompson, Martha; Schatz, Desmond; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Pugliese, Alberto; Concannon, Patrick; Anderson, Mark S.; German, Michael S.; Chamberlain, Chester E.; Atkinson, Mark A.; Brusko, Todd M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD) is the largest biorepository of human pancreata and associated immune organs from donors with type 1 diabetes (T1D), maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), gestational diabetes, islet autoantibody positivity (AAb+), and without diabetes. nPOD recovers, processes, analyzes, and distributes high-quality biospecimens, collected using optimized standard operating procedures, and associated de-identified data/metadata to researchers around the world. Herein describes the release of high-parameter genotyping data from this collection. 372 donors were genotyped using a custom precision medicine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray. Data were technically validated using published algorithms to evaluate donor relatedness, ancestry, imputed HLA, and T1D genetic risk score. Additionally, 207 donors were assessed for rare known and novel coding region variants via whole exome sequencing (WES). These data are publicly-available to enable genotype-specific sample requests and the study of novel genotype:phenotype associations, aiding in the mission of nPOD to enhance understanding of diabetes pathogenesis to promote the development of novel therapies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Barriers to Screening: An Analysis of Factors Impacting Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Prevention Trials
    (Oxford University Press, 2023-01-11) Kinney, Mara; You, Lu; Sims, Emily K.; Wherrett, Diane; Schatz, Desmond; Lord, Sandra; Krischer, Jeffrey; Russell, William E.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Libman, Ingrid; Buckner, Jane; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Steck, Andrea K.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Context: Participants with stage 1 or 2 type 1 diabetes (T1D) qualify for prevention trials, but factors involved in screening for such trials are largely unknown. Objective: To identify factors associated with screening for T1D prevention trials. Methods: This study included TrialNet Pathway to Prevention participants who were eligible for a prevention trial: oral insulin (TN-07, TN-20), teplizumab (TN-10), abatacept (TN-18), and oral hydroxychloroquine (TN-22). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine participant, site, and study factors at the time of prevention trial accrual. Results: Screening rates for trials were: 50% for TN-07 (584 screened/1172 eligible), 9% for TN-10 (106/1249), 24% for TN-18 (313/1285), 17% for TN-20 (113/667), and 28% for TN-22 (371/1336). Younger age and male sex were associated with higher screening rates for prevention trials overall and for oral therapies. Participants with an offspring with T1D showed lower rates of screening for all trials and oral drug trials compared with participants with other first-degree relatives as probands. Site factors, including larger monitoring volume and US site vs international site, were associated with higher prevention trial screening rates. Conclusions: Clear differences exist between participants who screen for prevention trials and those who do not screen and between the research sites involved in prevention trial screening. Participant age, sex, and relationship to proband are significantly associated with prevention trial screening in addition to key site factors. Identifying these factors can facilitate strategic recruitment planning to support rapid and successful enrollment into prevention trials.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    HLA-DRB1*15:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 Haplotype Protects Autoantibody-Positive Relatives From Type 1 Diabetes Throughout the Stages of Disease Progression
    (American Diabetes Association, 2016-04) Pugliese, Alberto; Boulware, David; Yu, Liping; Babu, Sunanda; Steck, Andrea K.; Becker, Dorothy; Rodriguez, Henry; DiMeglio, Linda; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Harrison, Leonard C.; Schatz, Desmond; Palmer, Jerry P.; Greenbaum, Carla; Eisenbarth, George S.; Sosenko, Jay M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The HLA-DRB1*15:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 haplotype is linked to protection from the development of type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, it is not known at which stages in the natural history of T1D development this haplotype affords protection. We examined a cohort of 3,358 autoantibody-positive relatives of T1D patients in the Pathway to Prevention (PTP) Study of the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet. The PTP study examines risk factors for T1D and disease progression in relatives. HLA typing revealed that 155 relatives carried this protective haplotype. A comparison with 60 autoantibody-negative relatives suggested protection from autoantibody development. Moreover, the relatives with DRB1*15:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 less frequently expressed autoantibodies associated with higher T1D risk, were less likely to have multiple autoantibodies at baseline, and rarely converted from single to multiple autoantibody positivity on follow-up. These relatives also had lower frequencies of metabolic abnormalities at baseline and exhibited no overall metabolic worsening on follow-up. Ultimately, they had a very low 5-year cumulative incidence of T1D. In conclusion, the protective influence of DRB1*15:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 spans from autoantibody development through all stages of progression, and relatives with this allele only rarely develop T1D.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Introducing the Endotype Concept to Address the Challenge of Disease Heterogeneity in Type 1 Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2020-01) Battaglia, Manuela; Ahmed, Simi; Anderson, Mark S.; Atkinson, Mark A.; Becker, Dorothy; Bingley, Polly J.; Bosi, Emanuele; Brusko, Todd M.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Gitelman, Stephen E.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Hessner, Martin J.; Knip, Mikael; Jacobsen, Laura; Krischer, Jeffrey P.; Long, S. Alice; Lundgren, Markus; McKinney, Eoin F.; Morgan, Noel G.; Oram, Richard A.; Pastinen, Tomi; Peters, Michael C.; Petrelli, Alessandra; Qian, Xiaoning; Redondo, Maria J.; Roep, Bart O.; Schatz, Desmond; Skibinski, David; Peakman, Mark; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The clinical diagnosis of new-onset type 1 diabetes has, for many years, been considered relatively straightforward. Recently, however, there is increasing awareness that within this single clinical phenotype exists considerable heterogeneity: disease onset spans the complete age range; genetic susceptibility is complex; rates of progression differ markedly, as does insulin secretory capacity; and complication rates, glycemic control, and therapeutic intervention efficacy vary widely. Mechanistic and immunopathological studies typically show considerable patchiness across subjects, undermining conclusions regarding disease pathways. Without better understanding, type 1 diabetes heterogeneity represents a major barrier both to deciphering pathogenesis and to the translational effort of designing, conducting, and interpreting clinical trials of disease-modifying agents. This realization comes during a period of unprecedented change in clinical medicine, with increasing emphasis on greater individualization and precision. For complex disorders such as type 1 diabetes, the option of maintaining the "single disease" approach appears untenable, as does the notion of individualizing each single patient's care, obliging us to conceptualize type 1 diabetes less in terms of phenotypes (observable characteristics) and more in terms of disease endotypes (underlying biological mechanisms). Here, we provide our view on an approach to dissect heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Using lessons from other diseases and the data gathered to date, we aim to delineate a roadmap through which the field can incorporate the endotype concept into laboratory and clinical practice. We predict that such an effort will accelerate the implementation of precision medicine and has the potential for impact on our approach to translational research, trial design, and clinical management.