ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Sanjuan, Adriano"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Novel Approach to Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Education: One-page Documents with Embedded E-Curriculum
    (2025-04-25) Markus, Nathan; Brenner, Daniel; Duncan, Francesca; Sanjuan, Adriano; Osborn, Eric; Carlos, Grahm; Jackson; Rishi, Muhammed; Jackson, Edwin
    Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has proven to be a valuable adjunct to the modern physical exam. The gold-standard approach of 1-on-1 learning image acquisition from sonographers and interpretation from clinician-experts is resource intensive, highlighting a need for alternative methods of teaching POCUS. Methods: This educational project utilized iterative development with the help of established POCUS educators and learner feedback in the form of surveys. Pre- and post- 30-day rotation surveys were administered and collected in Microsoft Forms. The survey questions comprised several categories including interest in learning POCUS, technical skill/image acquisition, and confidence in image interpretation. Learners were asked to rate their confidence in image acquisition and interpretation on a 5-level scale from “no skill” to “expert skill” as defined in the figures. Results: Preliminary survey data (n = 14) have been collected. Detailed results available in figures 2 and 3. In summary, 60% of learners were likely/very likely to use POCUS in clinical practice and 40% of learners were unlikely/very unlikely. Pre-intervention, 10% of learners rated their proficiency at image acquisition/probe placement at “no skill”, which decreased to 0% post-intervention. Sufficient skill in image acquisition increased from 20% pre-intervention to 50% post-intervention. Regarding image interpretation, 30% of learners rated skill in identifying anatomy as “no skill” or “little skill”. After the intervention, these groups decreased to 0%. Lastly, all participants felt that they were more confident in identifying cardiac anatomy after engaging with this project. All participants also reported that they would continue to use this resource this to learn POCUS. Conclusions: Learners perceive both value and effectiveness of this educational module. More work must be done to improve objectivity of results including engagement data, competency-based assessments, and randomization against the current standard education model.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Building a Culture of Growth and Safety: A Workshop on Positive Reinforcement, Mistreatment, and Psychological Safety
    (2025-04-25) Sanjuan, Adriano; Akolkar Kishor, Jay; Duncan, Francesca
    Introduction/Background. Medical training environments play a critical role in shaping the professional development and well-being of trainees. However, challenges such as ineffective feedback, mistreatment, and the absence of psychological safety can hinder learning and contribute to burnout and disengagement. This workshop integrates evidence-based strategies to foster positive reinforcement, address mistreatment, and promote psychological safety within educational and clinical settings. Study Objective/Hypothesis. We hypothesize that participants will report improved knowledge, skills, and confidence in: Recognizing, addressing, and reporting mistreatment effectively; providing feedback that promotes growth and motivation; creating environments that foster psychological safety. Objective: We aim to improve participants’ knowledge, skills, and confidence in: 1. Recognizing, addressing, and reporting mistreatment effectively. 2. Learn motivation techniques such as Self-Determination Theory, Growth-mindset and how to praise trainees, Effective Feedback, that fosters growth and motivation. 3. Creating psychologically safe environments conducive to learning and collaboration. Methods. This workshop was first delivered in March 2025 and will be repeated for a new group of participants. It consists of two parts: • Part I: Motivation Science and Learning Culture – This segment covers growth mindset, self-determination theory, psychological safety, and feedback strategies such as the Feedback Sandwich and Pendleton Model. It is followed by an interactive small-group scenario in which participants apply these concepts in a practical discussion. • Part II: Mistreatment Awareness and Response – This portion uses storytelling, video reflection, and case-based dialogue to explore mistreatment in clinical training. Participants are then introduced to the STAND-UP mnemonic, a novel tool created for this workshop, which consists of: Spot the situation. Think about intent. Acknowledge emotions. Name the situation. Document: Report events. Uplift yourself/others. Prevent future events). Results. Survey data will be collected for this workshop. Conclusions. This workshop aims to enhance learners’ ability to foster motivation, deliver effective feedback, and respond constructively to mistreatment. It offers a replicable model for improving educational climates and aligns with institutional goals of promoting inclusion and well-being in residency training.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Leveraging Advanced Cardiac POCUS in the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis with Negative Conventional Imaging: A Case Report
    (2025-04) Sanjuan, Adriano; Andrade, Heather; Bundy, Alyson; Clapham, Philip; Markus, Nathan; Brenner, Daniel; Hariri, Irina; Jackson, Edwin
    Introduction. Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition that includes bacteremia and echocardiographic findings. However, many cases yield inconclusive results with transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), creating diagnostic challenges. This report highlights the role of advanced cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in addressing these limitations, using daily POCUS exams to address these limitations. Case report. A 68-year-old male with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia and recurrent fevers underwent multiple conventional TTEs and a TEE, that failed to detect valvular vegetations. Advanced cardiac POCUS, including parasternal long-axis (PLAX), parasternal short-axis (PSAX), right ventricular (RV) inflow/outflow, and apical four-chamber views, was performed daily at the bedside. The PLAX view enabled visualization of new onset of aortic regurgitation, and Color Doppler imaging was applied to assess the severity of the valve disfunction. A vegetation in the aortic valve was identified, later confirmed by a consultative TTE and TEE, leading to a change in management. Discussion. This case highlights the utility of advanced cardiac POCUS in diagnosing IE when conventional imaging is inconclusive. Advanced cardiac POCUS offers immediate, bedside diagnostic insights, making it a valuable tool for critically ill patients. Compared to basic cardiac POCUS, the advanced cardiac POCUS includes the RV inflow/outflow (that can be achieved through tilting or fanning of the probe), and use of color Doppler. A study by Hellmann et al. demonstrated that medical residents could achieve significant proficiency with color Doppler, with minimal formal training, aligning with our experience. Despite limitations such as operator dependency and patient characteristics, the integration of advanced cardiac POCUS into diagnostic workflows has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes. Additionally, the case emphasizes the need for advanced cardiac POCUS education among trainees, expanding their ability to address complex clinical scenarios.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University